Cargando…
The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections
BACKGROUD: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially among high-risk patients. While previous studies have reported on the efficacy of ALBC in reducing the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), its impact on antibiotic resistance has n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Orthopaedic Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904007 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19058 |
_version_ | 1783574704106242048 |
---|---|
author | Schmitt, Daniel R. Killen, Cameron Murphy, Michael Perry, Michael Romano, Joseph Brown, Nicholas |
author_facet | Schmitt, Daniel R. Killen, Cameron Murphy, Michael Perry, Michael Romano, Joseph Brown, Nicholas |
author_sort | Schmitt, Daniel R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUD: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially among high-risk patients. While previous studies have reported on the efficacy of ALBC in reducing the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), its impact on antibiotic resistance has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate antibiotic resistance among organisms causing PJIs after TKA in which ALBC was utilized. METHODS: A retrospective review from December 1998 through December 2017 identified 36 PJIs that met inclusion criteria. Patients with culture-negative infection and unknown cement type were excluded. Patient characteristics, infecting organism, and antibiotic susceptibilities were recorded. ABLC included an aminoglycoside in all cases. RESULTS: There was no difference in the type of PJI between the 2 groups. Staphylococcus species was the most commonly isolated, with 9 of 16 cases (56.3%) using non-ALBC and 14 of 20 (65.0%) cases using ALBC. Of those infected with Staphylococcus, there was no significant difference in antibiotic susceptibilities between groups. Overall, there were only 3 cases where the infecting organism was aminoglycoside resistant (standard cement, 1; ALBC, 2). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the use of ALBC does not increase the risk of antibiotic resistance or affect the pattern of infection, even as the use of ALBC continues to increase, particularly among high-risk patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7449854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Korean Orthopaedic Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74498542020-09-03 The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections Schmitt, Daniel R. Killen, Cameron Murphy, Michael Perry, Michael Romano, Joseph Brown, Nicholas Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUD: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially among high-risk patients. While previous studies have reported on the efficacy of ALBC in reducing the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), its impact on antibiotic resistance has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate antibiotic resistance among organisms causing PJIs after TKA in which ALBC was utilized. METHODS: A retrospective review from December 1998 through December 2017 identified 36 PJIs that met inclusion criteria. Patients with culture-negative infection and unknown cement type were excluded. Patient characteristics, infecting organism, and antibiotic susceptibilities were recorded. ABLC included an aminoglycoside in all cases. RESULTS: There was no difference in the type of PJI between the 2 groups. Staphylococcus species was the most commonly isolated, with 9 of 16 cases (56.3%) using non-ALBC and 14 of 20 (65.0%) cases using ALBC. Of those infected with Staphylococcus, there was no significant difference in antibiotic susceptibilities between groups. Overall, there were only 3 cases where the infecting organism was aminoglycoside resistant (standard cement, 1; ALBC, 2). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the use of ALBC does not increase the risk of antibiotic resistance or affect the pattern of infection, even as the use of ALBC continues to increase, particularly among high-risk patients. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2020-09 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7449854/ /pubmed/32904007 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19058 Text en Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schmitt, Daniel R. Killen, Cameron Murphy, Michael Perry, Michael Romano, Joseph Brown, Nicholas The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections |
title | The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections |
title_full | The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections |
title_short | The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections |
title_sort | impact of antibiotic-loaded bone cement on antibiotic resistance in periprosthetic knee infections |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904007 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmittdanielr theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT killencameron theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT murphymichael theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT perrymichael theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT romanojoseph theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT brownnicholas theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT schmittdanielr impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT killencameron impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT murphymichael impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT perrymichael impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT romanojoseph impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections AT brownnicholas impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections |