Cargando…

The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections

BACKGROUD: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially among high-risk patients. While previous studies have reported on the efficacy of ALBC in reducing the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), its impact on antibiotic resistance has n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitt, Daniel R., Killen, Cameron, Murphy, Michael, Perry, Michael, Romano, Joseph, Brown, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904007
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19058
_version_ 1783574704106242048
author Schmitt, Daniel R.
Killen, Cameron
Murphy, Michael
Perry, Michael
Romano, Joseph
Brown, Nicholas
author_facet Schmitt, Daniel R.
Killen, Cameron
Murphy, Michael
Perry, Michael
Romano, Joseph
Brown, Nicholas
author_sort Schmitt, Daniel R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUD: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially among high-risk patients. While previous studies have reported on the efficacy of ALBC in reducing the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), its impact on antibiotic resistance has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate antibiotic resistance among organisms causing PJIs after TKA in which ALBC was utilized. METHODS: A retrospective review from December 1998 through December 2017 identified 36 PJIs that met inclusion criteria. Patients with culture-negative infection and unknown cement type were excluded. Patient characteristics, infecting organism, and antibiotic susceptibilities were recorded. ABLC included an aminoglycoside in all cases. RESULTS: There was no difference in the type of PJI between the 2 groups. Staphylococcus species was the most commonly isolated, with 9 of 16 cases (56.3%) using non-ALBC and 14 of 20 (65.0%) cases using ALBC. Of those infected with Staphylococcus, there was no significant difference in antibiotic susceptibilities between groups. Overall, there were only 3 cases where the infecting organism was aminoglycoside resistant (standard cement, 1; ALBC, 2). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the use of ALBC does not increase the risk of antibiotic resistance or affect the pattern of infection, even as the use of ALBC continues to increase, particularly among high-risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7449854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74498542020-09-03 The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections Schmitt, Daniel R. Killen, Cameron Murphy, Michael Perry, Michael Romano, Joseph Brown, Nicholas Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUD: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially among high-risk patients. While previous studies have reported on the efficacy of ALBC in reducing the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), its impact on antibiotic resistance has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate antibiotic resistance among organisms causing PJIs after TKA in which ALBC was utilized. METHODS: A retrospective review from December 1998 through December 2017 identified 36 PJIs that met inclusion criteria. Patients with culture-negative infection and unknown cement type were excluded. Patient characteristics, infecting organism, and antibiotic susceptibilities were recorded. ABLC included an aminoglycoside in all cases. RESULTS: There was no difference in the type of PJI between the 2 groups. Staphylococcus species was the most commonly isolated, with 9 of 16 cases (56.3%) using non-ALBC and 14 of 20 (65.0%) cases using ALBC. Of those infected with Staphylococcus, there was no significant difference in antibiotic susceptibilities between groups. Overall, there were only 3 cases where the infecting organism was aminoglycoside resistant (standard cement, 1; ALBC, 2). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the use of ALBC does not increase the risk of antibiotic resistance or affect the pattern of infection, even as the use of ALBC continues to increase, particularly among high-risk patients. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2020-09 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7449854/ /pubmed/32904007 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19058 Text en Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Schmitt, Daniel R.
Killen, Cameron
Murphy, Michael
Perry, Michael
Romano, Joseph
Brown, Nicholas
The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections
title The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections
title_full The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections
title_fullStr The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections
title_short The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections
title_sort impact of antibiotic-loaded bone cement on antibiotic resistance in periprosthetic knee infections
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904007
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19058
work_keys_str_mv AT schmittdanielr theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT killencameron theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT murphymichael theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT perrymichael theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT romanojoseph theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT brownnicholas theimpactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT schmittdanielr impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT killencameron impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT murphymichael impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT perrymichael impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT romanojoseph impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections
AT brownnicholas impactofantibioticloadedbonecementonantibioticresistanceinperiprosthetickneeinfections