Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study
AIM: The study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of various placement techniques of composite restoration on microleakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted premolars were selected and a rectangular-shaped cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of cervical third of each tooth....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904122 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1764 |
_version_ | 1783574767856517120 |
---|---|
author | Somani, Rani Som, Nitin K Jaidka, Shipra Hussain, Sharib |
author_facet | Somani, Rani Som, Nitin K Jaidka, Shipra Hussain, Sharib |
author_sort | Somani, Rani |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of various placement techniques of composite restoration on microleakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted premolars were selected and a rectangular-shaped cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of cervical third of each tooth. Thereafter, teeth were randomly divided into four groups equally and were restored with the composite restorative material with different placement techniques, i.e., bulk placement technique, horizontal incremental technique, split incremental technique, and newly introduced Mat incremental technique. Samples were thermocycled and immersed in methylene blue dye for 24 hours. The samples were then sectioned and evaluated under a stereomicroscope for microleakage. RESULTS: Microleakage was present least in the Mat incremental group and maximum in the bulk placement group while intercomparison revealed statistically significant difference between all the groups except for split incremental and Mat incremental groups. CONCLUSION: The recently introduced Mat incremental placement technique showed least microleakage when compared to conventional techniques. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Somani R, Som NK, Jaidka S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(3):264–268. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7450201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74502012020-09-04 Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study Somani, Rani Som, Nitin K Jaidka, Shipra Hussain, Sharib Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM: The study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of various placement techniques of composite restoration on microleakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted premolars were selected and a rectangular-shaped cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of cervical third of each tooth. Thereafter, teeth were randomly divided into four groups equally and were restored with the composite restorative material with different placement techniques, i.e., bulk placement technique, horizontal incremental technique, split incremental technique, and newly introduced Mat incremental technique. Samples were thermocycled and immersed in methylene blue dye for 24 hours. The samples were then sectioned and evaluated under a stereomicroscope for microleakage. RESULTS: Microleakage was present least in the Mat incremental group and maximum in the bulk placement group while intercomparison revealed statistically significant difference between all the groups except for split incremental and Mat incremental groups. CONCLUSION: The recently introduced Mat incremental placement technique showed least microleakage when compared to conventional techniques. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Somani R, Som NK, Jaidka S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(3):264–268. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7450201/ /pubmed/32904122 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1764 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Somani, Rani Som, Nitin K Jaidka, Shipra Hussain, Sharib Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of microleakage in various placement techniques of composite restoration: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904122 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT somanirani comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinvariousplacementtechniquesofcompositerestorationaninvitrostudy AT somnitink comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinvariousplacementtechniquesofcompositerestorationaninvitrostudy AT jaidkashipra comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinvariousplacementtechniquesofcompositerestorationaninvitrostudy AT hussainsharib comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinvariousplacementtechniquesofcompositerestorationaninvitrostudy |