Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study

AIM: The study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of various placement techniques of composite restoration on microleakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted premolars were selected and a rectangular-shaped cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of cervical third of each tooth....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somani, Rani, Som, Nitin K, Jaidka, Shipra, Hussain, Sharib
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904122
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1764
_version_ 1783574767856517120
author Somani, Rani
Som, Nitin K
Jaidka, Shipra
Hussain, Sharib
author_facet Somani, Rani
Som, Nitin K
Jaidka, Shipra
Hussain, Sharib
author_sort Somani, Rani
collection PubMed
description AIM: The study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of various placement techniques of composite restoration on microleakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted premolars were selected and a rectangular-shaped cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of cervical third of each tooth. Thereafter, teeth were randomly divided into four groups equally and were restored with the composite restorative material with different placement techniques, i.e., bulk placement technique, horizontal incremental technique, split incremental technique, and newly introduced Mat incremental technique. Samples were thermocycled and immersed in methylene blue dye for 24 hours. The samples were then sectioned and evaluated under a stereomicroscope for microleakage. RESULTS: Microleakage was present least in the Mat incremental group and maximum in the bulk placement group while intercomparison revealed statistically significant difference between all the groups except for split incremental and Mat incremental groups. CONCLUSION: The recently introduced Mat incremental placement technique showed least microleakage when compared to conventional techniques. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Somani R, Som NK, Jaidka S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(3):264–268.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7450201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74502012020-09-04 Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study Somani, Rani Som, Nitin K Jaidka, Shipra Hussain, Sharib Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM: The study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of various placement techniques of composite restoration on microleakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted premolars were selected and a rectangular-shaped cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of cervical third of each tooth. Thereafter, teeth were randomly divided into four groups equally and were restored with the composite restorative material with different placement techniques, i.e., bulk placement technique, horizontal incremental technique, split incremental technique, and newly introduced Mat incremental technique. Samples were thermocycled and immersed in methylene blue dye for 24 hours. The samples were then sectioned and evaluated under a stereomicroscope for microleakage. RESULTS: Microleakage was present least in the Mat incremental group and maximum in the bulk placement group while intercomparison revealed statistically significant difference between all the groups except for split incremental and Mat incremental groups. CONCLUSION: The recently introduced Mat incremental placement technique showed least microleakage when compared to conventional techniques. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Somani R, Som NK, Jaidka S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(3):264–268. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7450201/ /pubmed/32904122 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1764 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Somani, Rani
Som, Nitin K
Jaidka, Shipra
Hussain, Sharib
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of microleakage in various placement techniques of composite restoration: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904122
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1764
work_keys_str_mv AT somanirani comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinvariousplacementtechniquesofcompositerestorationaninvitrostudy
AT somnitink comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinvariousplacementtechniquesofcompositerestorationaninvitrostudy
AT jaidkashipra comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinvariousplacementtechniquesofcompositerestorationaninvitrostudy
AT hussainsharib comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinvariousplacementtechniquesofcompositerestorationaninvitrostudy