Cargando…

Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

PURPOSE: To develop a self-administered diagnostic screening questionnaire for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) consisting of items with high content validity and to investigate the diagnostic value of the questionnaire and the items. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A self-reported diagnostic LSS screening questi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Rikke Krüger, Lauridsen, Henrik Hein, Andresen, Andreas Duch Kiilerich, Mieritz, Rune Mygind, Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit, Vach, Werner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904080
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S263646
_version_ 1783574770484248576
author Jensen, Rikke Krüger
Lauridsen, Henrik Hein
Andresen, Andreas Duch Kiilerich
Mieritz, Rune Mygind
Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit
Vach, Werner
author_facet Jensen, Rikke Krüger
Lauridsen, Henrik Hein
Andresen, Andreas Duch Kiilerich
Mieritz, Rune Mygind
Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit
Vach, Werner
author_sort Jensen, Rikke Krüger
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a self-administered diagnostic screening questionnaire for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) consisting of items with high content validity and to investigate the diagnostic value of the questionnaire and the items. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A self-reported diagnostic LSS screening questionnaire was developed based on items from the existing literature describing key symptoms of LSS. The screening questionnaire (index test) was to be tested in a cohort of patients with persistent lumbar and/or leg pain recruited from a Danish publicly funded outpatient secondary care spine clinic with clinicians performing the reference test. However, to avoid unnecessary collection of data if the screening questionnaire proved to be of limited value, a case–control design was incorporated into the cohort design including an interim analysis. Additional cases for the case–control study were recruited at two Danish publicly funded spine surgery departments. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each individual item, and AUC (area under the curve) was calculated to examine the performance of the full questionnaire. RESULTS: A 13-item Danish questionnaire was developed and tested in 153 cases and 230 controls. The interim analysis was not in favour of continuing the cohort study, and therefore, only results from the case–control study are reported. There was a positive association for all items except the presence of back pain. However, the association was only moderate with ORs up to 3.3. When testing the performance of the whole questionnaire, an AUC of 0.72 was reached with a specificity of 20% for a fixed sensitivity of 95%. CONCLUSION: The items were associated with LSS and therefore have some potential to identify LSS patients. However, the association was not strong enough to provide sufficient accuracy for a diagnostic tool. Additional dimensions of symptoms of LSS need identification to obtain a reliable questionnaire for screening purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7450213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74502132020-09-04 Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Jensen, Rikke Krüger Lauridsen, Henrik Hein Andresen, Andreas Duch Kiilerich Mieritz, Rune Mygind Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit Vach, Werner Clin Epidemiol Original Research PURPOSE: To develop a self-administered diagnostic screening questionnaire for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) consisting of items with high content validity and to investigate the diagnostic value of the questionnaire and the items. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A self-reported diagnostic LSS screening questionnaire was developed based on items from the existing literature describing key symptoms of LSS. The screening questionnaire (index test) was to be tested in a cohort of patients with persistent lumbar and/or leg pain recruited from a Danish publicly funded outpatient secondary care spine clinic with clinicians performing the reference test. However, to avoid unnecessary collection of data if the screening questionnaire proved to be of limited value, a case–control design was incorporated into the cohort design including an interim analysis. Additional cases for the case–control study were recruited at two Danish publicly funded spine surgery departments. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each individual item, and AUC (area under the curve) was calculated to examine the performance of the full questionnaire. RESULTS: A 13-item Danish questionnaire was developed and tested in 153 cases and 230 controls. The interim analysis was not in favour of continuing the cohort study, and therefore, only results from the case–control study are reported. There was a positive association for all items except the presence of back pain. However, the association was only moderate with ORs up to 3.3. When testing the performance of the whole questionnaire, an AUC of 0.72 was reached with a specificity of 20% for a fixed sensitivity of 95%. CONCLUSION: The items were associated with LSS and therefore have some potential to identify LSS patients. However, the association was not strong enough to provide sufficient accuracy for a diagnostic tool. Additional dimensions of symptoms of LSS need identification to obtain a reliable questionnaire for screening purposes. Dove 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7450213/ /pubmed/32904080 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S263646 Text en © 2020 Jensen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Jensen, Rikke Krüger
Lauridsen, Henrik Hein
Andresen, Andreas Duch Kiilerich
Mieritz, Rune Mygind
Schiøttz-Christensen, Berit
Vach, Werner
Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_short Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_sort diagnostic screening for lumbar spinal stenosis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904080
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S263646
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenrikkekruger diagnosticscreeningforlumbarspinalstenosis
AT lauridsenhenrikhein diagnosticscreeningforlumbarspinalstenosis
AT andresenandreasduchkiilerich diagnosticscreeningforlumbarspinalstenosis
AT mieritzrunemygind diagnosticscreeningforlumbarspinalstenosis
AT schiøttzchristensenberit diagnosticscreeningforlumbarspinalstenosis
AT vachwerner diagnosticscreeningforlumbarspinalstenosis