Cargando…

Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams

IMPORTANCE: The risk of death from acute pulmonary embolism can range as high as 15%, depending on patient factors at initial presentation. Acute treatment decisions are largely based on an estimate of this mortality risk. OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of risk assessment scores in a modern, U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, Geoffrey D., Muzikansky, Alona, Cameron, Scott, Giri, Jay, Heresi, Gustavo A., Jaber, Wissam, Wood, Todd, Todoran, Thomas M., Courtney, D. Mark, Tapson, Victor, Kabrhel, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10779
_version_ 1783574800966352896
author Barnes, Geoffrey D.
Muzikansky, Alona
Cameron, Scott
Giri, Jay
Heresi, Gustavo A.
Jaber, Wissam
Wood, Todd
Todoran, Thomas M.
Courtney, D. Mark
Tapson, Victor
Kabrhel, Christopher
author_facet Barnes, Geoffrey D.
Muzikansky, Alona
Cameron, Scott
Giri, Jay
Heresi, Gustavo A.
Jaber, Wissam
Wood, Todd
Todoran, Thomas M.
Courtney, D. Mark
Tapson, Victor
Kabrhel, Christopher
author_sort Barnes, Geoffrey D.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The risk of death from acute pulmonary embolism can range as high as 15%, depending on patient factors at initial presentation. Acute treatment decisions are largely based on an estimate of this mortality risk. OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of risk assessment scores in a modern, US cohort of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study was conducted between October 2016 and October 2017 at 8 hospitals participating in the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) Consortium registry. Included patients were adults who presented with acute pulmonary embolism and had sufficient information in the medical record to calculate risk scores. Data analysis was performed from March to May 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: All-cause mortality (7- and 30-day) and associated discrimination were assessed by the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC). RESULTS: Among 416 patients with acute pulmonary embolism (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [17.6] years; 207 men [49.8%]), 7-day mortality in the low-risk groups ranged from 1.3% (1 patient) to 3.1% (4 patients), whereas 30-day mortality ranged from 2.6% (1 patient) to 10.2% (13 patients). Among patients in the highest-risk groups, the 7-day mortality ranged from 7.0% (18 patients) to 16.3% (7 patients), whereas 30-day mortality ranged from 14.4% (37 patients) to 26.3% (26 patients). Each of the risk stratification tools had modest discrimination for 7-day mortality (AUC range, 0.616-0.666) with slightly lower discrimination for 30-day mortality (AUC range, 0.550-0.694). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that commonly used risk tools for acute pulmonary embolism have modest estimating ability. Future studies to develop and validate better risk assessment tools are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7450352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74503522020-09-02 Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams Barnes, Geoffrey D. Muzikansky, Alona Cameron, Scott Giri, Jay Heresi, Gustavo A. Jaber, Wissam Wood, Todd Todoran, Thomas M. Courtney, D. Mark Tapson, Victor Kabrhel, Christopher JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The risk of death from acute pulmonary embolism can range as high as 15%, depending on patient factors at initial presentation. Acute treatment decisions are largely based on an estimate of this mortality risk. OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of risk assessment scores in a modern, US cohort of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study was conducted between October 2016 and October 2017 at 8 hospitals participating in the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) Consortium registry. Included patients were adults who presented with acute pulmonary embolism and had sufficient information in the medical record to calculate risk scores. Data analysis was performed from March to May 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: All-cause mortality (7- and 30-day) and associated discrimination were assessed by the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC). RESULTS: Among 416 patients with acute pulmonary embolism (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [17.6] years; 207 men [49.8%]), 7-day mortality in the low-risk groups ranged from 1.3% (1 patient) to 3.1% (4 patients), whereas 30-day mortality ranged from 2.6% (1 patient) to 10.2% (13 patients). Among patients in the highest-risk groups, the 7-day mortality ranged from 7.0% (18 patients) to 16.3% (7 patients), whereas 30-day mortality ranged from 14.4% (37 patients) to 26.3% (26 patients). Each of the risk stratification tools had modest discrimination for 7-day mortality (AUC range, 0.616-0.666) with slightly lower discrimination for 30-day mortality (AUC range, 0.550-0.694). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that commonly used risk tools for acute pulmonary embolism have modest estimating ability. Future studies to develop and validate better risk assessment tools are needed. American Medical Association 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7450352/ /pubmed/32845326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10779 Text en Copyright 2020 Barnes GD et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Barnes, Geoffrey D.
Muzikansky, Alona
Cameron, Scott
Giri, Jay
Heresi, Gustavo A.
Jaber, Wissam
Wood, Todd
Todoran, Thomas M.
Courtney, D. Mark
Tapson, Victor
Kabrhel, Christopher
Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams
title Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams
title_full Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams
title_fullStr Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams
title_short Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams
title_sort comparison of 4 acute pulmonary embolism mortality risk scores in patients evaluated by pulmonary embolism response teams
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10779
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesgeoffreyd comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT muzikanskyalona comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT cameronscott comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT girijay comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT heresigustavoa comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT jaberwissam comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT woodtodd comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT todoranthomasm comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT courtneydmark comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT tapsonvictor comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams
AT kabrhelchristopher comparisonof4acutepulmonaryembolismmortalityriskscoresinpatientsevaluatedbypulmonaryembolismresponseteams