Cargando…

Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study

BACKGROUND: Despite the increase in use and high expectations of digital health solutions, scientific evidence about the effectiveness of electronic health (eHealth) and other aspects such as usability and accuracy is lagging behind. eHealth solutions are complex interventions, which require a wide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonten, Tobias N, Rauwerdink, Anneloek, Wyatt, Jeremy C, Kasteleyn, Marise J, Witkamp, Leonard, Riper, Heleen, van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette JEWC, Cresswell, Kathrin, Sheikh, Aziz, Schijven, Marlies P, Chavannes, Niels H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784173
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17774
_version_ 1783574804216938496
author Bonten, Tobias N
Rauwerdink, Anneloek
Wyatt, Jeremy C
Kasteleyn, Marise J
Witkamp, Leonard
Riper, Heleen
van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette JEWC
Cresswell, Kathrin
Sheikh, Aziz
Schijven, Marlies P
Chavannes, Niels H
author_facet Bonten, Tobias N
Rauwerdink, Anneloek
Wyatt, Jeremy C
Kasteleyn, Marise J
Witkamp, Leonard
Riper, Heleen
van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette JEWC
Cresswell, Kathrin
Sheikh, Aziz
Schijven, Marlies P
Chavannes, Niels H
author_sort Bonten, Tobias N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the increase in use and high expectations of digital health solutions, scientific evidence about the effectiveness of electronic health (eHealth) and other aspects such as usability and accuracy is lagging behind. eHealth solutions are complex interventions, which require a wide array of evaluation approaches that are capable of answering the many different questions that arise during the consecutive study phases of eHealth development and implementation. However, evaluators seem to struggle in choosing suitable evaluation approaches in relation to a specific study phase. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this project was to provide a structured overview of the existing eHealth evaluation approaches, with the aim of assisting eHealth evaluators in selecting a suitable approach for evaluating their eHealth solution at a specific evaluation study phase. METHODS: Three consecutive steps were followed. Step 1 was a systematic scoping review, summarizing existing eHealth evaluation approaches. Step 2 was a concept mapping study asking eHealth researchers about approaches for evaluating eHealth. In step 3, the results of step 1 and 2 were used to develop an “eHealth evaluation cycle” and subsequently compose the online “eHealth methodology guide.” RESULTS: The scoping review yielded 57 articles describing 50 unique evaluation approaches. The concept mapping study questioned 43 eHealth researchers, resulting in 48 unique approaches. After removing duplicates, 75 unique evaluation approaches remained. Thereafter, an “eHealth evaluation cycle” was developed, consisting of six evaluation study phases: conceptual and planning, design, development and usability, pilot (feasibility), effectiveness (impact), uptake (implementation), and all phases. Finally, the “eHealth methodology guide” was composed by assigning the 75 evaluation approaches to the specific study phases of the “eHealth evaluation cycle.” CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-five unique evaluation approaches were found in the literature and suggested by eHealth researchers, which served as content for the online “eHealth methodology guide.” By assisting evaluators in selecting a suitable evaluation approach in relation to a specific study phase of the “eHealth evaluation cycle,” the guide aims to enhance the quality, safety, and successful long-term implementation of novel eHealth solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7450369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74503692020-08-31 Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study Bonten, Tobias N Rauwerdink, Anneloek Wyatt, Jeremy C Kasteleyn, Marise J Witkamp, Leonard Riper, Heleen van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette JEWC Cresswell, Kathrin Sheikh, Aziz Schijven, Marlies P Chavannes, Niels H J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Despite the increase in use and high expectations of digital health solutions, scientific evidence about the effectiveness of electronic health (eHealth) and other aspects such as usability and accuracy is lagging behind. eHealth solutions are complex interventions, which require a wide array of evaluation approaches that are capable of answering the many different questions that arise during the consecutive study phases of eHealth development and implementation. However, evaluators seem to struggle in choosing suitable evaluation approaches in relation to a specific study phase. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this project was to provide a structured overview of the existing eHealth evaluation approaches, with the aim of assisting eHealth evaluators in selecting a suitable approach for evaluating their eHealth solution at a specific evaluation study phase. METHODS: Three consecutive steps were followed. Step 1 was a systematic scoping review, summarizing existing eHealth evaluation approaches. Step 2 was a concept mapping study asking eHealth researchers about approaches for evaluating eHealth. In step 3, the results of step 1 and 2 were used to develop an “eHealth evaluation cycle” and subsequently compose the online “eHealth methodology guide.” RESULTS: The scoping review yielded 57 articles describing 50 unique evaluation approaches. The concept mapping study questioned 43 eHealth researchers, resulting in 48 unique approaches. After removing duplicates, 75 unique evaluation approaches remained. Thereafter, an “eHealth evaluation cycle” was developed, consisting of six evaluation study phases: conceptual and planning, design, development and usability, pilot (feasibility), effectiveness (impact), uptake (implementation), and all phases. Finally, the “eHealth methodology guide” was composed by assigning the 75 evaluation approaches to the specific study phases of the “eHealth evaluation cycle.” CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-five unique evaluation approaches were found in the literature and suggested by eHealth researchers, which served as content for the online “eHealth methodology guide.” By assisting evaluators in selecting a suitable evaluation approach in relation to a specific study phase of the “eHealth evaluation cycle,” the guide aims to enhance the quality, safety, and successful long-term implementation of novel eHealth solutions. JMIR Publications 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7450369/ /pubmed/32784173 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17774 Text en ©Tobias N Bonten, Anneloek Rauwerdink, Jeremy C Wyatt, Marise J Kasteleyn, Leonard Witkamp, Heleen Riper, Lisette JEWC van Gemert-Pijnen, Kathrin Cresswell, Aziz Sheikh, Marlies P Schijven, Niels H Chavannes, EHealth Evaluation Research Group. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 12.08.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bonten, Tobias N
Rauwerdink, Anneloek
Wyatt, Jeremy C
Kasteleyn, Marise J
Witkamp, Leonard
Riper, Heleen
van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette JEWC
Cresswell, Kathrin
Sheikh, Aziz
Schijven, Marlies P
Chavannes, Niels H
Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study
title Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study
title_full Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study
title_fullStr Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study
title_full_unstemmed Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study
title_short Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study
title_sort online guide for electronic health evaluation approaches: systematic scoping review and concept mapping study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784173
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17774
work_keys_str_mv AT bontentobiasn onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT rauwerdinkanneloek onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT wyattjeremyc onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT kasteleynmarisej onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT witkampleonard onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT riperheleen onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT vangemertpijnenlisettejewc onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT cresswellkathrin onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT sheikhaziz onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT schijvenmarliesp onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT chavannesnielsh onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy
AT onlineguideforelectronichealthevaluationapproachessystematicscopingreviewandconceptmappingstudy