Cargando…

Effect of ACL Reconstruction on Range of Tibial Rotation: A Systematic Review of Current Literature and a Recommendation for a Standard Measuring Protocol

BACKGROUND: Tibial rotation is an important topic in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, and many efforts are being made to address rotational stability. The exact role of the ACL in controlling tibial rotation in clinical studies is unknown. PURPOSE: To quantify the effect of ACL reconstructi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zee, Mark J.M., Robben, Bart J., Zuurmond, Rutger G., Bulstra, Sjoerd K., Diercks, Ronald L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120945967
_version_ 1783574814181556224
author Zee, Mark J.M.
Robben, Bart J.
Zuurmond, Rutger G.
Bulstra, Sjoerd K.
Diercks, Ronald L.
author_facet Zee, Mark J.M.
Robben, Bart J.
Zuurmond, Rutger G.
Bulstra, Sjoerd K.
Diercks, Ronald L.
author_sort Zee, Mark J.M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tibial rotation is an important topic in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, and many efforts are being made to address rotational stability. The exact role of the ACL in controlling tibial rotation in clinical studies is unknown. PURPOSE: To quantify the effect of ACL reconstruction on the amount of tibial rotation based on the current available literature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed in August 2019. Two independent reviewers reviewed titles and abstracts as well as full-text articles. A total of 2383 studies were screened for eligibility. After screening of titles and abstracts, 178 articles remained for full-text assessment. Ultimately, 13 studies were included for analysis. A quality assessment was performed by means of the RoB 2.0 (revised tool for Risk of Bias in randomized trials) and the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions) tools. RESULTS: According to the studies using computer-assisted surgery that were included in this review, ACL reconstruction resulted in an average reduction in tibial rotation of 17% to 32% compared with preoperatively; whether the range of tibial rotation returned to preinjury levels remained unclear. In the current literature, a gold standard for measuring tibial rotation is lacking. Major differences between the study protocols were found. Several techniques for measuring tibial rotation were used, each with its own limitations. Most studies lacked proper description of accompanying injuries. CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction reduced the range of tibial rotation by 17% to 32%. Normal values for the range of tibial rotation in patients with ACL deficiency and those who undergo ACL reconstruction could not be provided based on the current available literature owing to a lack of uniform measuring techniques and protocols. Therefore, we advocate uniformity in measuring tibial rotation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7450468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74504682020-09-11 Effect of ACL Reconstruction on Range of Tibial Rotation: A Systematic Review of Current Literature and a Recommendation for a Standard Measuring Protocol Zee, Mark J.M. Robben, Bart J. Zuurmond, Rutger G. Bulstra, Sjoerd K. Diercks, Ronald L. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Tibial rotation is an important topic in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, and many efforts are being made to address rotational stability. The exact role of the ACL in controlling tibial rotation in clinical studies is unknown. PURPOSE: To quantify the effect of ACL reconstruction on the amount of tibial rotation based on the current available literature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed in August 2019. Two independent reviewers reviewed titles and abstracts as well as full-text articles. A total of 2383 studies were screened for eligibility. After screening of titles and abstracts, 178 articles remained for full-text assessment. Ultimately, 13 studies were included for analysis. A quality assessment was performed by means of the RoB 2.0 (revised tool for Risk of Bias in randomized trials) and the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions) tools. RESULTS: According to the studies using computer-assisted surgery that were included in this review, ACL reconstruction resulted in an average reduction in tibial rotation of 17% to 32% compared with preoperatively; whether the range of tibial rotation returned to preinjury levels remained unclear. In the current literature, a gold standard for measuring tibial rotation is lacking. Major differences between the study protocols were found. Several techniques for measuring tibial rotation were used, each with its own limitations. Most studies lacked proper description of accompanying injuries. CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction reduced the range of tibial rotation by 17% to 32%. Normal values for the range of tibial rotation in patients with ACL deficiency and those who undergo ACL reconstruction could not be provided based on the current available literature owing to a lack of uniform measuring techniques and protocols. Therefore, we advocate uniformity in measuring tibial rotation. SAGE Publications 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7450468/ /pubmed/32923504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120945967 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Zee, Mark J.M.
Robben, Bart J.
Zuurmond, Rutger G.
Bulstra, Sjoerd K.
Diercks, Ronald L.
Effect of ACL Reconstruction on Range of Tibial Rotation: A Systematic Review of Current Literature and a Recommendation for a Standard Measuring Protocol
title Effect of ACL Reconstruction on Range of Tibial Rotation: A Systematic Review of Current Literature and a Recommendation for a Standard Measuring Protocol
title_full Effect of ACL Reconstruction on Range of Tibial Rotation: A Systematic Review of Current Literature and a Recommendation for a Standard Measuring Protocol
title_fullStr Effect of ACL Reconstruction on Range of Tibial Rotation: A Systematic Review of Current Literature and a Recommendation for a Standard Measuring Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Effect of ACL Reconstruction on Range of Tibial Rotation: A Systematic Review of Current Literature and a Recommendation for a Standard Measuring Protocol
title_short Effect of ACL Reconstruction on Range of Tibial Rotation: A Systematic Review of Current Literature and a Recommendation for a Standard Measuring Protocol
title_sort effect of acl reconstruction on range of tibial rotation: a systematic review of current literature and a recommendation for a standard measuring protocol
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120945967
work_keys_str_mv AT zeemarkjm effectofaclreconstructiononrangeoftibialrotationasystematicreviewofcurrentliteratureandarecommendationforastandardmeasuringprotocol
AT robbenbartj effectofaclreconstructiononrangeoftibialrotationasystematicreviewofcurrentliteratureandarecommendationforastandardmeasuringprotocol
AT zuurmondrutgerg effectofaclreconstructiononrangeoftibialrotationasystematicreviewofcurrentliteratureandarecommendationforastandardmeasuringprotocol
AT bulstrasjoerdk effectofaclreconstructiononrangeoftibialrotationasystematicreviewofcurrentliteratureandarecommendationforastandardmeasuringprotocol
AT diercksronaldl effectofaclreconstructiononrangeoftibialrotationasystematicreviewofcurrentliteratureandarecommendationforastandardmeasuringprotocol