Cargando…

Author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer”

We explain to Dr. Benjamin (corresponding author) about why low-dose computed tomography reduce lung cancer mortality without significantly reducing all-cause mortality. We also conduct an up-to-date meta-analysis to evaluate low-dose computed tomography clinical effectiveness compared with usual ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Kai-Lin, Wang, Shih-Yuan, Lu, Wan-Chen, Chang, Ya-Hui, Su, Jian, Lu, Yen-Ta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01247-y
_version_ 1783574855201849344
author Huang, Kai-Lin
Wang, Shih-Yuan
Lu, Wan-Chen
Chang, Ya-Hui
Su, Jian
Lu, Yen-Ta
author_facet Huang, Kai-Lin
Wang, Shih-Yuan
Lu, Wan-Chen
Chang, Ya-Hui
Su, Jian
Lu, Yen-Ta
author_sort Huang, Kai-Lin
collection PubMed
description We explain to Dr. Benjamin (corresponding author) about why low-dose computed tomography reduce lung cancer mortality without significantly reducing all-cause mortality. We also conduct an up-to-date meta-analysis to evaluate low-dose computed tomography clinical effectiveness compared with usual care of lung cancer screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7450698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74506982020-08-28 Author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer” Huang, Kai-Lin Wang, Shih-Yuan Lu, Wan-Chen Chang, Ya-Hui Su, Jian Lu, Yen-Ta BMC Pulm Med Correspondence We explain to Dr. Benjamin (corresponding author) about why low-dose computed tomography reduce lung cancer mortality without significantly reducing all-cause mortality. We also conduct an up-to-date meta-analysis to evaluate low-dose computed tomography clinical effectiveness compared with usual care of lung cancer screening. BioMed Central 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7450698/ /pubmed/32847562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01247-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Huang, Kai-Lin
Wang, Shih-Yuan
Lu, Wan-Chen
Chang, Ya-Hui
Su, Jian
Lu, Yen-Ta
Author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer”
title Author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer”
title_full Author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer”
title_fullStr Author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer”
title_full_unstemmed Author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer”
title_short Author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer”
title_sort author response to “lack of benefit from low dose computed tomography in screening for lung cancer”
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01247-y
work_keys_str_mv AT huangkailin authorresponsetolackofbenefitfromlowdosecomputedtomographyinscreeningforlungcancer
AT wangshihyuan authorresponsetolackofbenefitfromlowdosecomputedtomographyinscreeningforlungcancer
AT luwanchen authorresponsetolackofbenefitfromlowdosecomputedtomographyinscreeningforlungcancer
AT changyahui authorresponsetolackofbenefitfromlowdosecomputedtomographyinscreeningforlungcancer
AT sujian authorresponsetolackofbenefitfromlowdosecomputedtomographyinscreeningforlungcancer
AT luyenta authorresponsetolackofbenefitfromlowdosecomputedtomographyinscreeningforlungcancer