Cargando…
Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find the best severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100750 |
_version_ | 1783574911688638464 |
---|---|
author | Waked, R. Makhoul, J. Saliba, G. Chehata, N. Mortada, S. Zoghbi, A. Choucair, J. Haddad, E. |
author_facet | Waked, R. Makhoul, J. Saliba, G. Chehata, N. Mortada, S. Zoghbi, A. Choucair, J. Haddad, E. |
author_sort | Waked, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find the best severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) of upper or lower respiratory tract secretions. We sought to demonstrate the importance of conducting RT-PCR using deep sampling when initial upper respiratory testing is negative in cases of high index of suspicion for COVID-19. We present the case of a 47-year-old man admitted for fever and bilateral pneumonia diagnosed via chest computed tomographic scan amidst the early peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two RT-PCR results from nasopharyngeal swab samples were negative. A bronchoscopy was then performed, and RT-PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage samples yielded positive results, confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. RT-PCR samples of the lower respiratory tract likely contain a higher virus load and thus retain a higher sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7451052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74510522020-08-28 Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? Waked, R. Makhoul, J. Saliba, G. Chehata, N. Mortada, S. Zoghbi, A. Choucair, J. Haddad, E. New Microbes New Infect First Clinical Case Report The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find the best severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) of upper or lower respiratory tract secretions. We sought to demonstrate the importance of conducting RT-PCR using deep sampling when initial upper respiratory testing is negative in cases of high index of suspicion for COVID-19. We present the case of a 47-year-old man admitted for fever and bilateral pneumonia diagnosed via chest computed tomographic scan amidst the early peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two RT-PCR results from nasopharyngeal swab samples were negative. A bronchoscopy was then performed, and RT-PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage samples yielded positive results, confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. RT-PCR samples of the lower respiratory tract likely contain a higher virus load and thus retain a higher sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Elsevier 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7451052/ /pubmed/32874594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100750 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | First Clinical Case Report Waked, R. Makhoul, J. Saliba, G. Chehata, N. Mortada, S. Zoghbi, A. Choucair, J. Haddad, E. Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? |
title | Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? |
title_full | Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? |
title_fullStr | Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? |
title_short | Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? |
title_sort | are two consecutive negative rt-pcr results enough to rule out covid-19? |
topic | First Clinical Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100750 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wakedr aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19 AT makhoulj aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19 AT salibag aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19 AT chehatan aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19 AT mortadas aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19 AT zoghbia aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19 AT choucairj aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19 AT haddade aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19 |