Cargando…

Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find the best severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waked, R., Makhoul, J., Saliba, G., Chehata, N., Mortada, S., Zoghbi, A., Choucair, J., Haddad, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100750
_version_ 1783574911688638464
author Waked, R.
Makhoul, J.
Saliba, G.
Chehata, N.
Mortada, S.
Zoghbi, A.
Choucair, J.
Haddad, E.
author_facet Waked, R.
Makhoul, J.
Saliba, G.
Chehata, N.
Mortada, S.
Zoghbi, A.
Choucair, J.
Haddad, E.
author_sort Waked, R.
collection PubMed
description The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find the best severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) of upper or lower respiratory tract secretions. We sought to demonstrate the importance of conducting RT-PCR using deep sampling when initial upper respiratory testing is negative in cases of high index of suspicion for COVID-19. We present the case of a 47-year-old man admitted for fever and bilateral pneumonia diagnosed via chest computed tomographic scan amidst the early peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two RT-PCR results from nasopharyngeal swab samples were negative. A bronchoscopy was then performed, and RT-PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage samples yielded positive results, confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. RT-PCR samples of the lower respiratory tract likely contain a higher virus load and thus retain a higher sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7451052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74510522020-08-28 Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? Waked, R. Makhoul, J. Saliba, G. Chehata, N. Mortada, S. Zoghbi, A. Choucair, J. Haddad, E. New Microbes New Infect First Clinical Case Report The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find the best severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) of upper or lower respiratory tract secretions. We sought to demonstrate the importance of conducting RT-PCR using deep sampling when initial upper respiratory testing is negative in cases of high index of suspicion for COVID-19. We present the case of a 47-year-old man admitted for fever and bilateral pneumonia diagnosed via chest computed tomographic scan amidst the early peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two RT-PCR results from nasopharyngeal swab samples were negative. A bronchoscopy was then performed, and RT-PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage samples yielded positive results, confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. RT-PCR samples of the lower respiratory tract likely contain a higher virus load and thus retain a higher sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Elsevier 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7451052/ /pubmed/32874594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100750 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle First Clinical Case Report
Waked, R.
Makhoul, J.
Saliba, G.
Chehata, N.
Mortada, S.
Zoghbi, A.
Choucair, J.
Haddad, E.
Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?
title Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?
title_full Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?
title_fullStr Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?
title_full_unstemmed Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?
title_short Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?
title_sort are two consecutive negative rt-pcr results enough to rule out covid-19?
topic First Clinical Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100750
work_keys_str_mv AT wakedr aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19
AT makhoulj aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19
AT salibag aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19
AT chehatan aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19
AT mortadas aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19
AT zoghbia aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19
AT choucairj aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19
AT haddade aretwoconsecutivenegativertpcrresultsenoughtoruleoutcovid19