Cargando…
COVID-19 pandemic in the United States
OBJECTIVES: The paper highlights US health policy and technology responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from January 1, 2020 – August 9, 2020. METHODS: A review of primary data sources in the US was conducted. The data were summarized to describe national and state-level trends in the spread of COVID-19...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.007 |
_version_ | 1783574925915717632 |
---|---|
author | Bergquist, Savannah Otten, Thomas Sarich, Nick |
author_facet | Bergquist, Savannah Otten, Thomas Sarich, Nick |
author_sort | Bergquist, Savannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The paper highlights US health policy and technology responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from January 1, 2020 – August 9, 2020. METHODS: A review of primary data sources in the US was conducted. The data were summarized to describe national and state-level trends in the spread of COVID-19 and in policy and technology solutions. RESULTS: COVID-19 cases and deaths initially peaked in late March and April, but after a brief reduction in June cases and deaths began rising again during July and continued to climb into early August. The US policy response is best characterized by its federalist, decentralized nature. The national government has led in terms of economic and fiscal response, increasing funding for scientific research into testing, treatment, and vaccines, and in creating more favorable regulations for the use of telemedicine. State governments have been responsible for many of the containment, testing, and treatment responses, often with little federal government support. Policies that favor economic re-opening are often followed by increases in state-level case numbers, which are then followed by stricter containment measures, such as mask wearing or pausing re-opening plans. CONCLUSIONS: While all US states have begun to “re-open” economic activities, this trend appears to be largely driven by social tensions and economic motivations rather than an ability to effectively test and surveil populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7451131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74511312020-08-28 COVID-19 pandemic in the United States Bergquist, Savannah Otten, Thomas Sarich, Nick Health Policy Technol Article OBJECTIVES: The paper highlights US health policy and technology responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from January 1, 2020 – August 9, 2020. METHODS: A review of primary data sources in the US was conducted. The data were summarized to describe national and state-level trends in the spread of COVID-19 and in policy and technology solutions. RESULTS: COVID-19 cases and deaths initially peaked in late March and April, but after a brief reduction in June cases and deaths began rising again during July and continued to climb into early August. The US policy response is best characterized by its federalist, decentralized nature. The national government has led in terms of economic and fiscal response, increasing funding for scientific research into testing, treatment, and vaccines, and in creating more favorable regulations for the use of telemedicine. State governments have been responsible for many of the containment, testing, and treatment responses, often with little federal government support. Policies that favor economic re-opening are often followed by increases in state-level case numbers, which are then followed by stricter containment measures, such as mask wearing or pausing re-opening plans. CONCLUSIONS: While all US states have begun to “re-open” economic activities, this trend appears to be largely driven by social tensions and economic motivations rather than an ability to effectively test and surveil populations. Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-12 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7451131/ /pubmed/32874854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.007 Text en © 2020 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Bergquist, Savannah Otten, Thomas Sarich, Nick COVID-19 pandemic in the United States |
title | COVID-19 pandemic in the United States |
title_full | COVID-19 pandemic in the United States |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 pandemic in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 pandemic in the United States |
title_short | COVID-19 pandemic in the United States |
title_sort | covid-19 pandemic in the united states |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergquistsavannah covid19pandemicintheunitedstates AT ottenthomas covid19pandemicintheunitedstates AT sarichnick covid19pandemicintheunitedstates |