Cargando…
Patients’ Adult Attachment Interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated?
In the last decade of his career, Jeremy Safran became increasingly interested in investigating the ways in which attachment representations influence the therapeutic relationship. In this paper, we test such influence in a sample of thirty outpatients who received Brief Relational Therapy by compar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.361 |
_version_ | 1783574957623607296 |
---|---|
author | Talia, Alessandro Miller-Bottome, Madeleine Wyner, Rachel Lilliengren, Peter Bate, Jordan |
author_facet | Talia, Alessandro Miller-Bottome, Madeleine Wyner, Rachel Lilliengren, Peter Bate, Jordan |
author_sort | Talia, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the last decade of his career, Jeremy Safran became increasingly interested in investigating the ways in which attachment representations influence the therapeutic relationship. In this paper, we test such influence in a sample of thirty outpatients who received Brief Relational Therapy by comparing their independently coded pre-treatment Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) with their narratives in a post-treatment interview about the relationship with the therapist (the Patient Relationship Interview at Termination, PRI-T). The PRI-T was coded with the following three measures: i) The Patient Attachment to Therapist Rating Scale (PAT-RS), which assesses the quality of the patient’s attachment relationship to the therapist; ii) the Coherence scale from the AAI, adapted for use on the PRI-T; and iii) the Patient Attachment Classification System (PACS), which measures generalized differences in how individuals convey their experiences and feelings. Results suggest that patients’ AAI predicts how they experience, represent, and communicate about the therapeutic relationship at the end of treatment, as shown by the PAT-RS, the Coherence scale adapted for use on the PRI-T, and the PACS applied to the PRI-T. These findings lend support to Safran and others’ hypothesis that patients’ AAI-status plays a role in patients’ representations of the relationship with the therapist. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7451326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74513262020-09-09 Patients’ Adult Attachment Interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated? Talia, Alessandro Miller-Bottome, Madeleine Wyner, Rachel Lilliengren, Peter Bate, Jordan Res Psychother Article In the last decade of his career, Jeremy Safran became increasingly interested in investigating the ways in which attachment representations influence the therapeutic relationship. In this paper, we test such influence in a sample of thirty outpatients who received Brief Relational Therapy by comparing their independently coded pre-treatment Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) with their narratives in a post-treatment interview about the relationship with the therapist (the Patient Relationship Interview at Termination, PRI-T). The PRI-T was coded with the following three measures: i) The Patient Attachment to Therapist Rating Scale (PAT-RS), which assesses the quality of the patient’s attachment relationship to the therapist; ii) the Coherence scale from the AAI, adapted for use on the PRI-T; and iii) the Patient Attachment Classification System (PACS), which measures generalized differences in how individuals convey their experiences and feelings. Results suggest that patients’ AAI predicts how they experience, represent, and communicate about the therapeutic relationship at the end of treatment, as shown by the PAT-RS, the Coherence scale adapted for use on the PRI-T, and the PACS applied to the PRI-T. These findings lend support to Safran and others’ hypothesis that patients’ AAI-status plays a role in patients’ representations of the relationship with the therapist. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7451326/ /pubmed/32913798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.361 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s), 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Talia, Alessandro Miller-Bottome, Madeleine Wyner, Rachel Lilliengren, Peter Bate, Jordan Patients’ Adult Attachment Interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated? |
title | Patients’ Adult Attachment Interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated? |
title_full | Patients’ Adult Attachment Interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated? |
title_fullStr | Patients’ Adult Attachment Interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated? |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ Adult Attachment Interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated? |
title_short | Patients’ Adult Attachment Interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated? |
title_sort | patients’ adult attachment interview classification and their experience of the therapeutic relationship: are they associated? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taliaalessandro patientsadultattachmentinterviewclassificationandtheirexperienceofthetherapeuticrelationshiparetheyassociated AT millerbottomemadeleine patientsadultattachmentinterviewclassificationandtheirexperienceofthetherapeuticrelationshiparetheyassociated AT wynerrachel patientsadultattachmentinterviewclassificationandtheirexperienceofthetherapeuticrelationshiparetheyassociated AT lilliengrenpeter patientsadultattachmentinterviewclassificationandtheirexperienceofthetherapeuticrelationshiparetheyassociated AT batejordan patientsadultattachmentinterviewclassificationandtheirexperienceofthetherapeuticrelationshiparetheyassociated |