Cargando…

Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease

INTRODUCTION: It is important to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of alternative services to traditional cardiac rehabilitation while the economic credentials of the Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) programme among people with coronary heart disease (CHD) are unkno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Lan, Maddison, Ralph, Rawstorn, Jonathan, Ball, Kylie, Oldenburg, Brian, Chow, Clara, McNaughton, Sarah, Lamb, Karen, Amerena, John, Nadurata, Voltaire, Neil, Christopher, Cameron, Stuart, Moodie, Marj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038178
_version_ 1783574987659018240
author Gao, Lan
Maddison, Ralph
Rawstorn, Jonathan
Ball, Kylie
Oldenburg, Brian
Chow, Clara
McNaughton, Sarah
Lamb, Karen
Amerena, John
Nadurata, Voltaire
Neil, Christopher
Cameron, Stuart
Moodie, Marj
author_facet Gao, Lan
Maddison, Ralph
Rawstorn, Jonathan
Ball, Kylie
Oldenburg, Brian
Chow, Clara
McNaughton, Sarah
Lamb, Karen
Amerena, John
Nadurata, Voltaire
Neil, Christopher
Cameron, Stuart
Moodie, Marj
author_sort Gao, Lan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: It is important to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of alternative services to traditional cardiac rehabilitation while the economic credentials of the Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) programme among people with coronary heart disease (CHD) are unknown. This economic protocol outlines the methods for undertaking a trial-based economic evaluation of SCRAM in the real-world setting in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to determine the effectiveness of SCRAM in comparison with the usual care cardiac rehabilitation (UC) alone in people with CHD. Pathway analysis will be performed to identify all the costs related to the delivery of SCRAM and UC. Both a healthcare system and a limited societal perspective will be adopted to gauge all costs associated with health resource utilisation and productivity loss. Healthcare resource use over the 6-month participation period will be extracted from administrative databases (ie, Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medical Benefits Schedule). Productivity loss will be measured by absenteeism from work (valued by human capital approach). The primary outcomes for the economic evaluation are maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max, mL/kg/min, primary RCT outcome) and quality-adjusted life years estimated from health-related quality of life as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D instrument. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated using the differences in costs and benefits (ie, primary and secondary outcomes) between the two randomised groups from both perspectives with no discounting. All costs will be valued in Australian dollars for year 2020. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved under Australia’s National Mutual Acceptance agreement by the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/MH/119). It is anticipated that SCRAM is a cost-effective cardiac telerehabilitation programme for people with CHD from both a healthcare and a limited societal perspective in Australia. The evaluation will provide evidence to underpin national scale-up of the programme to a wider population. The results of the economic analysis will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001458224).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7451486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74514862020-09-02 Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease Gao, Lan Maddison, Ralph Rawstorn, Jonathan Ball, Kylie Oldenburg, Brian Chow, Clara McNaughton, Sarah Lamb, Karen Amerena, John Nadurata, Voltaire Neil, Christopher Cameron, Stuart Moodie, Marj BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: It is important to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of alternative services to traditional cardiac rehabilitation while the economic credentials of the Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) programme among people with coronary heart disease (CHD) are unknown. This economic protocol outlines the methods for undertaking a trial-based economic evaluation of SCRAM in the real-world setting in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to determine the effectiveness of SCRAM in comparison with the usual care cardiac rehabilitation (UC) alone in people with CHD. Pathway analysis will be performed to identify all the costs related to the delivery of SCRAM and UC. Both a healthcare system and a limited societal perspective will be adopted to gauge all costs associated with health resource utilisation and productivity loss. Healthcare resource use over the 6-month participation period will be extracted from administrative databases (ie, Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medical Benefits Schedule). Productivity loss will be measured by absenteeism from work (valued by human capital approach). The primary outcomes for the economic evaluation are maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max, mL/kg/min, primary RCT outcome) and quality-adjusted life years estimated from health-related quality of life as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D instrument. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated using the differences in costs and benefits (ie, primary and secondary outcomes) between the two randomised groups from both perspectives with no discounting. All costs will be valued in Australian dollars for year 2020. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved under Australia’s National Mutual Acceptance agreement by the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/MH/119). It is anticipated that SCRAM is a cost-effective cardiac telerehabilitation programme for people with CHD from both a healthcare and a limited societal perspective in Australia. The evaluation will provide evidence to underpin national scale-up of the programme to a wider population. The results of the economic analysis will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001458224). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7451486/ /pubmed/32847918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038178 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Gao, Lan
Maddison, Ralph
Rawstorn, Jonathan
Ball, Kylie
Oldenburg, Brian
Chow, Clara
McNaughton, Sarah
Lamb, Karen
Amerena, John
Nadurata, Voltaire
Neil, Christopher
Cameron, Stuart
Moodie, Marj
Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease
title Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease
title_full Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease
title_fullStr Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease
title_short Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease
title_sort economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare smartphone cardiac rehabilitation, assisted self-management (scram) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038178
work_keys_str_mv AT gaolan economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT maddisonralph economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT rawstornjonathan economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT ballkylie economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT oldenburgbrian economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT chowclara economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT mcnaughtonsarah economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT lambkaren economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT amerenajohn economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT naduratavoltaire economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT neilchristopher economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT cameronstuart economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease
AT moodiemarj economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease