Cargando…
Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease
INTRODUCTION: It is important to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of alternative services to traditional cardiac rehabilitation while the economic credentials of the Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) programme among people with coronary heart disease (CHD) are unkno...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038178 |
_version_ | 1783574987659018240 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Lan Maddison, Ralph Rawstorn, Jonathan Ball, Kylie Oldenburg, Brian Chow, Clara McNaughton, Sarah Lamb, Karen Amerena, John Nadurata, Voltaire Neil, Christopher Cameron, Stuart Moodie, Marj |
author_facet | Gao, Lan Maddison, Ralph Rawstorn, Jonathan Ball, Kylie Oldenburg, Brian Chow, Clara McNaughton, Sarah Lamb, Karen Amerena, John Nadurata, Voltaire Neil, Christopher Cameron, Stuart Moodie, Marj |
author_sort | Gao, Lan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: It is important to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of alternative services to traditional cardiac rehabilitation while the economic credentials of the Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) programme among people with coronary heart disease (CHD) are unknown. This economic protocol outlines the methods for undertaking a trial-based economic evaluation of SCRAM in the real-world setting in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to determine the effectiveness of SCRAM in comparison with the usual care cardiac rehabilitation (UC) alone in people with CHD. Pathway analysis will be performed to identify all the costs related to the delivery of SCRAM and UC. Both a healthcare system and a limited societal perspective will be adopted to gauge all costs associated with health resource utilisation and productivity loss. Healthcare resource use over the 6-month participation period will be extracted from administrative databases (ie, Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medical Benefits Schedule). Productivity loss will be measured by absenteeism from work (valued by human capital approach). The primary outcomes for the economic evaluation are maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max, mL/kg/min, primary RCT outcome) and quality-adjusted life years estimated from health-related quality of life as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D instrument. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated using the differences in costs and benefits (ie, primary and secondary outcomes) between the two randomised groups from both perspectives with no discounting. All costs will be valued in Australian dollars for year 2020. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved under Australia’s National Mutual Acceptance agreement by the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/MH/119). It is anticipated that SCRAM is a cost-effective cardiac telerehabilitation programme for people with CHD from both a healthcare and a limited societal perspective in Australia. The evaluation will provide evidence to underpin national scale-up of the programme to a wider population. The results of the economic analysis will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001458224). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7451486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74514862020-09-02 Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease Gao, Lan Maddison, Ralph Rawstorn, Jonathan Ball, Kylie Oldenburg, Brian Chow, Clara McNaughton, Sarah Lamb, Karen Amerena, John Nadurata, Voltaire Neil, Christopher Cameron, Stuart Moodie, Marj BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: It is important to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of alternative services to traditional cardiac rehabilitation while the economic credentials of the Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) programme among people with coronary heart disease (CHD) are unknown. This economic protocol outlines the methods for undertaking a trial-based economic evaluation of SCRAM in the real-world setting in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to determine the effectiveness of SCRAM in comparison with the usual care cardiac rehabilitation (UC) alone in people with CHD. Pathway analysis will be performed to identify all the costs related to the delivery of SCRAM and UC. Both a healthcare system and a limited societal perspective will be adopted to gauge all costs associated with health resource utilisation and productivity loss. Healthcare resource use over the 6-month participation period will be extracted from administrative databases (ie, Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medical Benefits Schedule). Productivity loss will be measured by absenteeism from work (valued by human capital approach). The primary outcomes for the economic evaluation are maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max, mL/kg/min, primary RCT outcome) and quality-adjusted life years estimated from health-related quality of life as assessed by the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D instrument. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated using the differences in costs and benefits (ie, primary and secondary outcomes) between the two randomised groups from both perspectives with no discounting. All costs will be valued in Australian dollars for year 2020. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved under Australia’s National Mutual Acceptance agreement by the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/MH/119). It is anticipated that SCRAM is a cost-effective cardiac telerehabilitation programme for people with CHD from both a healthcare and a limited societal perspective in Australia. The evaluation will provide evidence to underpin national scale-up of the programme to a wider population. The results of the economic analysis will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001458224). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7451486/ /pubmed/32847918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038178 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Gao, Lan Maddison, Ralph Rawstorn, Jonathan Ball, Kylie Oldenburg, Brian Chow, Clara McNaughton, Sarah Lamb, Karen Amerena, John Nadurata, Voltaire Neil, Christopher Cameron, Stuart Moodie, Marj Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease |
title | Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease |
title_full | Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease |
title_fullStr | Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease |
title_short | Economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation, Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease |
title_sort | economic evaluation protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare smartphone cardiac rehabilitation, assisted self-management (scram) versus usual care cardiac rehabilitation among people with coronary heart disease |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaolan economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT maddisonralph economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT rawstornjonathan economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT ballkylie economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT oldenburgbrian economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT chowclara economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT mcnaughtonsarah economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT lambkaren economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT amerenajohn economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT naduratavoltaire economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT neilchristopher economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT cameronstuart economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease AT moodiemarj economicevaluationprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparesmartphonecardiacrehabilitationassistedselfmanagementscramversususualcarecardiacrehabilitationamongpeoplewithcoronaryheartdisease |