Cargando…

Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies

OBJECTIVES: To assess the health impacts and environmental consequences of adherence to national dietary recommendations (the Eatwell Guide (EWG)) in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: A secondary analysis of multiple observational studies in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Adults from the European Prospective Inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheelbeek, Pauline, Green, Rosemary, Papier, Keren, Knuppel, Anika, Alae-Carew, Carmelia, Balkwill, Angela, Key, Timothy J, Beral, Valerie, Dangour, Alan D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037554
_version_ 1783574996671528960
author Scheelbeek, Pauline
Green, Rosemary
Papier, Keren
Knuppel, Anika
Alae-Carew, Carmelia
Balkwill, Angela
Key, Timothy J
Beral, Valerie
Dangour, Alan D
author_facet Scheelbeek, Pauline
Green, Rosemary
Papier, Keren
Knuppel, Anika
Alae-Carew, Carmelia
Balkwill, Angela
Key, Timothy J
Beral, Valerie
Dangour, Alan D
author_sort Scheelbeek, Pauline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the health impacts and environmental consequences of adherence to national dietary recommendations (the Eatwell Guide (EWG)) in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: A secondary analysis of multiple observational studies in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Adults from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer - Oxford(EPIC-Oxford), UK Biobank and Million Women Study, and adults and children aged 5 and over from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS). Primary and secondary outcome measures risk of total mortality from Cox proportional hazards regression models, total greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) and blue water footprint (WF) associated with ‘very low’ (0–2 recommendations), ‘low’ (3–4 recommendations) or ‘intermediate-to-high’ (5–9 recommendations) adherence to EWG recommendations. RESULTS: Less than 0.1% of the NDNS sample adhere to all nine EWG recommendations and 30.6% adhere to at least five recommendations. Compared with ‘very low’ adherence to EWG recommendations, ‘intermediate-to-high adherence’ was associated with a reduced risk of mortality (risk ratio (RR): 0.93; 99% CI: 0.90 to 0.97) and −1.6 kg CO(2)eq/day (95% CI: −1.5 to −1.8), or 30% lower dietary GHGe. Dietary WFs were similar across EWG adherence groups. Of the individual Eatwell guidelines, adherence to the recommendation on fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with the largest reduction in total mortality risk: an RR of 0.90 (99% CI: 0.88 to 0.93). Increased adherence to the recommendation on red and processed meat consumption was associated with the largest decrease in environmental footprints (−1.48 kg CO(2)eq/day, 95% CI: −1.79 to 1.18 for GHGe and −22.5 L/day, 95% CI: −22.7 to 22.3 for blue WF). CONCLUSIONS: The health and environmental benefits of greater adherence to EWG recommendations support increased government efforts to encourage improved diets in the UK that are essential for the health of people and the planet in the Anthropocene.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7451532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74515322020-09-02 Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies Scheelbeek, Pauline Green, Rosemary Papier, Keren Knuppel, Anika Alae-Carew, Carmelia Balkwill, Angela Key, Timothy J Beral, Valerie Dangour, Alan D BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: To assess the health impacts and environmental consequences of adherence to national dietary recommendations (the Eatwell Guide (EWG)) in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: A secondary analysis of multiple observational studies in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Adults from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer - Oxford(EPIC-Oxford), UK Biobank and Million Women Study, and adults and children aged 5 and over from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS). Primary and secondary outcome measures risk of total mortality from Cox proportional hazards regression models, total greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) and blue water footprint (WF) associated with ‘very low’ (0–2 recommendations), ‘low’ (3–4 recommendations) or ‘intermediate-to-high’ (5–9 recommendations) adherence to EWG recommendations. RESULTS: Less than 0.1% of the NDNS sample adhere to all nine EWG recommendations and 30.6% adhere to at least five recommendations. Compared with ‘very low’ adherence to EWG recommendations, ‘intermediate-to-high adherence’ was associated with a reduced risk of mortality (risk ratio (RR): 0.93; 99% CI: 0.90 to 0.97) and −1.6 kg CO(2)eq/day (95% CI: −1.5 to −1.8), or 30% lower dietary GHGe. Dietary WFs were similar across EWG adherence groups. Of the individual Eatwell guidelines, adherence to the recommendation on fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with the largest reduction in total mortality risk: an RR of 0.90 (99% CI: 0.88 to 0.93). Increased adherence to the recommendation on red and processed meat consumption was associated with the largest decrease in environmental footprints (−1.48 kg CO(2)eq/day, 95% CI: −1.79 to 1.18 for GHGe and −22.5 L/day, 95% CI: −22.7 to 22.3 for blue WF). CONCLUSIONS: The health and environmental benefits of greater adherence to EWG recommendations support increased government efforts to encourage improved diets in the UK that are essential for the health of people and the planet in the Anthropocene. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7451532/ /pubmed/32847945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037554 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global Health
Scheelbeek, Pauline
Green, Rosemary
Papier, Keren
Knuppel, Anika
Alae-Carew, Carmelia
Balkwill, Angela
Key, Timothy J
Beral, Valerie
Dangour, Alan D
Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies
title Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies
title_full Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies
title_fullStr Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies
title_full_unstemmed Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies
title_short Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies
title_sort health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the eatwell guide recommendations: analyses of multiple uk studies
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037554
work_keys_str_mv AT scheelbeekpauline healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies
AT greenrosemary healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies
AT papierkeren healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies
AT knuppelanika healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies
AT alaecarewcarmelia healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies
AT balkwillangela healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies
AT keytimothyj healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies
AT beralvalerie healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies
AT dangouraland healthimpactsandenvironmentalfootprintsofdietsthatmeettheeatwellguiderecommendationsanalysesofmultipleukstudies