Cargando…

Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang

BACKGROUND: Varus malposition is a risk of early failure in total hip arthroplasty. The degree to which the tip of the greater trochanter (GT) overhangs the canal can increase this risk. Although we know proximal femoral anatomy is variable, no study has addressed variations in medial overhang of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horberg, John V., Tapscott, David C., Kurcz, Brian P., O’Rourke, Ryan J., Mikesell, Timothy A., Owen, Trevor M., Allan, D. Gordon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32875012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.020
_version_ 1783575067420000256
author Horberg, John V.
Tapscott, David C.
Kurcz, Brian P.
O’Rourke, Ryan J.
Mikesell, Timothy A.
Owen, Trevor M.
Allan, D. Gordon
author_facet Horberg, John V.
Tapscott, David C.
Kurcz, Brian P.
O’Rourke, Ryan J.
Mikesell, Timothy A.
Owen, Trevor M.
Allan, D. Gordon
author_sort Horberg, John V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Varus malposition is a risk of early failure in total hip arthroplasty. The degree to which the tip of the greater trochanter (GT) overhangs the canal can increase this risk. Although we know proximal femoral anatomy is variable, no study has addressed variations in medial overhang of the GT on plain radiographs. METHODS: All low anteroposterior pelvis radiographs more than 1 year were reviewed 3 times by 2 orthopaedic surgeons and one radiologist. The canal width (CW) was measured 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. Canal overhang (CO) was defined by the distance between the lateral medullary canal and a parallel line beginning at the most medial aspect of the GT. The overhang index (OI) is defined as the percentage of the canal overhung by the GT. RESULTS: The mean CW was 13.5 mm, mean CO 16.4 mm, and mean OI 1.22. Hips were then classified as the following: (A) OI < 0.5 (n = 8), (B) OI 0.5-1.0 (n = 78), (C) OI 1.0-1.5 (n = 191), and (D) OI > 1.5 (n = 68). Intraobserver reliability was excellent for all measures: 0.89 (confidence interval: 0.87-0.91) for CW, 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for CO, and 0.97 (0.97-0.98) for OI. Interobserver reliability was good for CW 0.75 (0.70-0.79) and excellent for CO 0.90 (0.88-0.92) and OI 0.95 (0.94-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Variations in the morphology of the proximal femur can predispose to varus component malposition. The degree to which the GT overhangs the canal can be quantified and classified based on plain films. This can aid in preoperative planning and help guide intraoperative proximal femoral preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7451874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74518742020-08-31 Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang Horberg, John V. Tapscott, David C. Kurcz, Brian P. O’Rourke, Ryan J. Mikesell, Timothy A. Owen, Trevor M. Allan, D. Gordon Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: Varus malposition is a risk of early failure in total hip arthroplasty. The degree to which the tip of the greater trochanter (GT) overhangs the canal can increase this risk. Although we know proximal femoral anatomy is variable, no study has addressed variations in medial overhang of the GT on plain radiographs. METHODS: All low anteroposterior pelvis radiographs more than 1 year were reviewed 3 times by 2 orthopaedic surgeons and one radiologist. The canal width (CW) was measured 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. Canal overhang (CO) was defined by the distance between the lateral medullary canal and a parallel line beginning at the most medial aspect of the GT. The overhang index (OI) is defined as the percentage of the canal overhung by the GT. RESULTS: The mean CW was 13.5 mm, mean CO 16.4 mm, and mean OI 1.22. Hips were then classified as the following: (A) OI < 0.5 (n = 8), (B) OI 0.5-1.0 (n = 78), (C) OI 1.0-1.5 (n = 191), and (D) OI > 1.5 (n = 68). Intraobserver reliability was excellent for all measures: 0.89 (confidence interval: 0.87-0.91) for CW, 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for CO, and 0.97 (0.97-0.98) for OI. Interobserver reliability was good for CW 0.75 (0.70-0.79) and excellent for CO 0.90 (0.88-0.92) and OI 0.95 (0.94-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Variations in the morphology of the proximal femur can predispose to varus component malposition. The degree to which the GT overhangs the canal can be quantified and classified based on plain films. This can aid in preoperative planning and help guide intraoperative proximal femoral preparation. Elsevier 2020-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7451874/ /pubmed/32875012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.020 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Horberg, John V.
Tapscott, David C.
Kurcz, Brian P.
O’Rourke, Ryan J.
Mikesell, Timothy A.
Owen, Trevor M.
Allan, D. Gordon
Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang
title Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang
title_full Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang
title_fullStr Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang
title_full_unstemmed Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang
title_short Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang
title_sort morphology of the greater trochanter: an assessment of anatomic variation and canal overhang
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32875012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.020
work_keys_str_mv AT horbergjohnv morphologyofthegreatertrochanteranassessmentofanatomicvariationandcanaloverhang
AT tapscottdavidc morphologyofthegreatertrochanteranassessmentofanatomicvariationandcanaloverhang
AT kurczbrianp morphologyofthegreatertrochanteranassessmentofanatomicvariationandcanaloverhang
AT orourkeryanj morphologyofthegreatertrochanteranassessmentofanatomicvariationandcanaloverhang
AT mikeselltimothya morphologyofthegreatertrochanteranassessmentofanatomicvariationandcanaloverhang
AT owentrevorm morphologyofthegreatertrochanteranassessmentofanatomicvariationandcanaloverhang
AT allandgordon morphologyofthegreatertrochanteranassessmentofanatomicvariationandcanaloverhang