Cargando…

Can Surgeons Identify ACL Femoral Ridges Landmark and Optimal Tunnel Position? A 3D Model Study

PURPOSE: To examine the ability of surgeons to identify the osseous landmarks associated with the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint and locate optimal tunnel placement on 3-dimensional (3D) printed models compared with intraoperative placement. METHODS: Twelve sports fellowship-trai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laverdiere, Carl, Schupbach, Drew, Schupbach, Justin, Harvey, Eric, Boily, Mathieu, Burman, Mark, Martineau, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32875301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.008
_version_ 1783575074649931776
author Laverdiere, Carl
Schupbach, Drew
Schupbach, Justin
Harvey, Eric
Boily, Mathieu
Burman, Mark
Martineau, Paul A.
author_facet Laverdiere, Carl
Schupbach, Drew
Schupbach, Justin
Harvey, Eric
Boily, Mathieu
Burman, Mark
Martineau, Paul A.
author_sort Laverdiere, Carl
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine the ability of surgeons to identify the osseous landmarks associated with the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint and locate optimal tunnel placement on 3-dimensional (3D) printed models compared with intraoperative placement. METHODS: Twelve sports fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons were asked to identify a femoral landmark and an ACL footprint on 10 different 3D printed knees. The 3D models were made based on 20 real patients with different anatomical morphology who later received ACL reconstructive surgery using independent drilling. ImageJ software was used to quantify the measurements, which were then analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall, none of the surgeons were able to consistently identify the junction of the bony ridges. The mean error per participant ranged from 2.81 to 7.34 mm in the proximal direction (P = 3.30e-05) and from 2.42 to 8.05 mm in the posterior direction (P =4.88e-12). None of the surgeons were able to appropriately identify the center of the femoral footprint on the anatomic 3D models. The difference between the center of the footprint surgeons identified on the 3D model and the tunnel graft location in surgery was significantly different (P = .0046). On average, the magnitude of the error when the surgeons performed the actual surgery was 3.72 ± 2.43 mm, whereas on the 3D models it was 5.82 ± 1.97 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced sports fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons were unable to correctly identify the junction of the intercondylar and bifurcate ridges and the native ACL footprint on 3D models. Operatively placed tunnels were more accurate implying that looking either through a scope or soft-tissue landmarks play a significant role in surgeons ACL footprint localization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The graft position for ACL reconstruction plays an important role on the kinematics of the knee. This paper shows that soft tissue landmarks are needed to provide reliable reference points for reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7451917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74519172020-08-31 Can Surgeons Identify ACL Femoral Ridges Landmark and Optimal Tunnel Position? A 3D Model Study Laverdiere, Carl Schupbach, Drew Schupbach, Justin Harvey, Eric Boily, Mathieu Burman, Mark Martineau, Paul A. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To examine the ability of surgeons to identify the osseous landmarks associated with the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint and locate optimal tunnel placement on 3-dimensional (3D) printed models compared with intraoperative placement. METHODS: Twelve sports fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons were asked to identify a femoral landmark and an ACL footprint on 10 different 3D printed knees. The 3D models were made based on 20 real patients with different anatomical morphology who later received ACL reconstructive surgery using independent drilling. ImageJ software was used to quantify the measurements, which were then analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall, none of the surgeons were able to consistently identify the junction of the bony ridges. The mean error per participant ranged from 2.81 to 7.34 mm in the proximal direction (P = 3.30e-05) and from 2.42 to 8.05 mm in the posterior direction (P =4.88e-12). None of the surgeons were able to appropriately identify the center of the femoral footprint on the anatomic 3D models. The difference between the center of the footprint surgeons identified on the 3D model and the tunnel graft location in surgery was significantly different (P = .0046). On average, the magnitude of the error when the surgeons performed the actual surgery was 3.72 ± 2.43 mm, whereas on the 3D models it was 5.82 ± 1.97 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced sports fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons were unable to correctly identify the junction of the intercondylar and bifurcate ridges and the native ACL footprint on 3D models. Operatively placed tunnels were more accurate implying that looking either through a scope or soft-tissue landmarks play a significant role in surgeons ACL footprint localization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The graft position for ACL reconstruction plays an important role on the kinematics of the knee. This paper shows that soft tissue landmarks are needed to provide reliable reference points for reconstruction. Elsevier 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7451917/ /pubmed/32875301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.008 Text en Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the Arthroscopy Association of North America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Laverdiere, Carl
Schupbach, Drew
Schupbach, Justin
Harvey, Eric
Boily, Mathieu
Burman, Mark
Martineau, Paul A.
Can Surgeons Identify ACL Femoral Ridges Landmark and Optimal Tunnel Position? A 3D Model Study
title Can Surgeons Identify ACL Femoral Ridges Landmark and Optimal Tunnel Position? A 3D Model Study
title_full Can Surgeons Identify ACL Femoral Ridges Landmark and Optimal Tunnel Position? A 3D Model Study
title_fullStr Can Surgeons Identify ACL Femoral Ridges Landmark and Optimal Tunnel Position? A 3D Model Study
title_full_unstemmed Can Surgeons Identify ACL Femoral Ridges Landmark and Optimal Tunnel Position? A 3D Model Study
title_short Can Surgeons Identify ACL Femoral Ridges Landmark and Optimal Tunnel Position? A 3D Model Study
title_sort can surgeons identify acl femoral ridges landmark and optimal tunnel position? a 3d model study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32875301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.008
work_keys_str_mv AT laverdierecarl cansurgeonsidentifyaclfemoralridgeslandmarkandoptimaltunnelpositiona3dmodelstudy
AT schupbachdrew cansurgeonsidentifyaclfemoralridgeslandmarkandoptimaltunnelpositiona3dmodelstudy
AT schupbachjustin cansurgeonsidentifyaclfemoralridgeslandmarkandoptimaltunnelpositiona3dmodelstudy
AT harveyeric cansurgeonsidentifyaclfemoralridgeslandmarkandoptimaltunnelpositiona3dmodelstudy
AT boilymathieu cansurgeonsidentifyaclfemoralridgeslandmarkandoptimaltunnelpositiona3dmodelstudy
AT burmanmark cansurgeonsidentifyaclfemoralridgeslandmarkandoptimaltunnelpositiona3dmodelstudy
AT martineaupaula cansurgeonsidentifyaclfemoralridgeslandmarkandoptimaltunnelpositiona3dmodelstudy