Cargando…

Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women

Stress has many consequences for our wellbeing, both physically and psychologically, underscoring the need to study markers of differential sensitivity to stressful situations. We examined associations between empathy and mentalizing abilities and psycho-physiological responses to a psychosocial str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tollenaar, Marieke S., Overgaauw, Sandy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04488
_version_ 1783575172136042496
author Tollenaar, Marieke S.
Overgaauw, Sandy
author_facet Tollenaar, Marieke S.
Overgaauw, Sandy
author_sort Tollenaar, Marieke S.
collection PubMed
description Stress has many consequences for our wellbeing, both physically and psychologically, underscoring the need to study markers of differential sensitivity to stressful situations. We examined associations between empathy and mentalizing abilities and psycho-physiological responses to a psychosocial stress task. We conducted two highly comparable studies, the first in men (N = 52) and the second in women (N = 72). Each study started with a self-report empathy measure and a mentalizing test [Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)] followed by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) or a control task. Stress reactivity was confirmed in both men and women with significantly higher levels of cortisol, blood pressure, and subjective stress levels in response to the TSST compared to the control task. Higher accuracy on the RMET significantly predicted higher cortisol and heart rate reactivity, while self-reported empathic concern significantly predicted higher subjective stress reactivity. These associations were found in men, and when men and women were analyzed together. This indicates that higher levels of mentalizing and empathic abilities may confer sensitivity to socially stressful situations. While a moderation analysis indicated no gender differences in these associations, the findings could not be directly replicated in women. This suggests that gender may impact such associations and that replication of the findings in larger samples is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7452492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74524922020-09-03 Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women Tollenaar, Marieke S. Overgaauw, Sandy Heliyon Article Stress has many consequences for our wellbeing, both physically and psychologically, underscoring the need to study markers of differential sensitivity to stressful situations. We examined associations between empathy and mentalizing abilities and psycho-physiological responses to a psychosocial stress task. We conducted two highly comparable studies, the first in men (N = 52) and the second in women (N = 72). Each study started with a self-report empathy measure and a mentalizing test [Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)] followed by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) or a control task. Stress reactivity was confirmed in both men and women with significantly higher levels of cortisol, blood pressure, and subjective stress levels in response to the TSST compared to the control task. Higher accuracy on the RMET significantly predicted higher cortisol and heart rate reactivity, while self-reported empathic concern significantly predicted higher subjective stress reactivity. These associations were found in men, and when men and women were analyzed together. This indicates that higher levels of mentalizing and empathic abilities may confer sensitivity to socially stressful situations. While a moderation analysis indicated no gender differences in these associations, the findings could not be directly replicated in women. This suggests that gender may impact such associations and that replication of the findings in larger samples is warranted. Elsevier 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7452492/ /pubmed/32904299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04488 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tollenaar, Marieke S.
Overgaauw, Sandy
Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women
title Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women
title_full Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women
title_fullStr Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women
title_full_unstemmed Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women
title_short Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women
title_sort empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04488
work_keys_str_mv AT tollenaarmariekes empathyandmentalizingabilitiesinrelationtopsychosocialstressinhealthyadultmenandwomen
AT overgaauwsandy empathyandmentalizingabilitiesinrelationtopsychosocialstressinhealthyadultmenandwomen