Cargando…
Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women
Stress has many consequences for our wellbeing, both physically and psychologically, underscoring the need to study markers of differential sensitivity to stressful situations. We examined associations between empathy and mentalizing abilities and psycho-physiological responses to a psychosocial str...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04488 |
_version_ | 1783575172136042496 |
---|---|
author | Tollenaar, Marieke S. Overgaauw, Sandy |
author_facet | Tollenaar, Marieke S. Overgaauw, Sandy |
author_sort | Tollenaar, Marieke S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stress has many consequences for our wellbeing, both physically and psychologically, underscoring the need to study markers of differential sensitivity to stressful situations. We examined associations between empathy and mentalizing abilities and psycho-physiological responses to a psychosocial stress task. We conducted two highly comparable studies, the first in men (N = 52) and the second in women (N = 72). Each study started with a self-report empathy measure and a mentalizing test [Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)] followed by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) or a control task. Stress reactivity was confirmed in both men and women with significantly higher levels of cortisol, blood pressure, and subjective stress levels in response to the TSST compared to the control task. Higher accuracy on the RMET significantly predicted higher cortisol and heart rate reactivity, while self-reported empathic concern significantly predicted higher subjective stress reactivity. These associations were found in men, and when men and women were analyzed together. This indicates that higher levels of mentalizing and empathic abilities may confer sensitivity to socially stressful situations. While a moderation analysis indicated no gender differences in these associations, the findings could not be directly replicated in women. This suggests that gender may impact such associations and that replication of the findings in larger samples is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7452492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74524922020-09-03 Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women Tollenaar, Marieke S. Overgaauw, Sandy Heliyon Article Stress has many consequences for our wellbeing, both physically and psychologically, underscoring the need to study markers of differential sensitivity to stressful situations. We examined associations between empathy and mentalizing abilities and psycho-physiological responses to a psychosocial stress task. We conducted two highly comparable studies, the first in men (N = 52) and the second in women (N = 72). Each study started with a self-report empathy measure and a mentalizing test [Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)] followed by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) or a control task. Stress reactivity was confirmed in both men and women with significantly higher levels of cortisol, blood pressure, and subjective stress levels in response to the TSST compared to the control task. Higher accuracy on the RMET significantly predicted higher cortisol and heart rate reactivity, while self-reported empathic concern significantly predicted higher subjective stress reactivity. These associations were found in men, and when men and women were analyzed together. This indicates that higher levels of mentalizing and empathic abilities may confer sensitivity to socially stressful situations. While a moderation analysis indicated no gender differences in these associations, the findings could not be directly replicated in women. This suggests that gender may impact such associations and that replication of the findings in larger samples is warranted. Elsevier 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7452492/ /pubmed/32904299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04488 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tollenaar, Marieke S. Overgaauw, Sandy Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women |
title | Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women |
title_full | Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women |
title_fullStr | Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women |
title_full_unstemmed | Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women |
title_short | Empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women |
title_sort | empathy and mentalizing abilities in relation to psychosocial stress in healthy adult men and women |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04488 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tollenaarmariekes empathyandmentalizingabilitiesinrelationtopsychosocialstressinhealthyadultmenandwomen AT overgaauwsandy empathyandmentalizingabilitiesinrelationtopsychosocialstressinhealthyadultmenandwomen |