Cargando…

Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia

INTRODUCTION: We aim to report on results and challenges of different methods used for hepatitis C (HCV) genotyping in a Cambodian HCV/HIV coinfection project. METHODS: Samples of 106 patients were available. HCV genotyping was initially (63 samples) done by the LightPower Taqman real-time PCR metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Weggheleire, Anja, De Baetselier, Irith, An, Sokkab, Goletti, Sylvie, Suin, Vanessa, Thai, Sopheak, Francque, Sven, Crucitti, Tania, Lynen, Lutgarde, Van Gucht, Steven, Kabamba, Benoît Mukadi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00304-7
_version_ 1783575271176142848
author De Weggheleire, Anja
De Baetselier, Irith
An, Sokkab
Goletti, Sylvie
Suin, Vanessa
Thai, Sopheak
Francque, Sven
Crucitti, Tania
Lynen, Lutgarde
Van Gucht, Steven
Kabamba, Benoît Mukadi
author_facet De Weggheleire, Anja
De Baetselier, Irith
An, Sokkab
Goletti, Sylvie
Suin, Vanessa
Thai, Sopheak
Francque, Sven
Crucitti, Tania
Lynen, Lutgarde
Van Gucht, Steven
Kabamba, Benoît Mukadi
author_sort De Weggheleire, Anja
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We aim to report on results and challenges of different methods used for hepatitis C (HCV) genotyping in a Cambodian HCV/HIV coinfection project. METHODS: Samples of 106 patients were available. HCV genotyping was initially (63 samples) done by the LightPower Taqman real-time PCR method (Viet A Corp.) and quality controlled using the Versant 2.0 line probe assay (Siemens Healthcare). Next, following interim quality control results, all 106 samples were (re)genotyped with Versant 2.0, complemented with 5′UTR/core sequencing for uninterpretable/incomplete Versant results. RESULTS: Using Versant, 103 (97.2%) of the 106 HCV-coinfected patients had an interpretable genotype result: 1b (50.5%), 6 non-a/non-b (30.1%), 1a (6.8%), 6a or b (4.9%), 2 (3.9%), 1 (2.9%) and 3 (1.0%). For 16 samples that were interpreted as genotype 1 or 1b per Versant's current instructions, it could not be excluded that it concerned a genotype 6 infection as the core region line patterns on the Versant test strip were unavailable, inconclusive or atypical. Upon sequencing, seven of these were genotyped as 1b and nine as genotype 6. Combining Versant and sequencing results, a definitive genotype was assigned in 104 patients: 1b (44.2%), 6 non-a/non-b (39.4%), 1a (6.7%), 6a or b (4.8%), 2 (3.8%) and 3 (1.0%). Genotyping by LightPower and Versant was discordant for 23 (of 63) samples. The LightPower assay misclassified all genotype 6 non-a/non-b samples as genotype 1, which indicates that this assay is only using 5′UTR information. CONCLUSIONS: HCV genotype 1b and genotype 6 non-a/non-b were most common. With Versant 2.0 (using 5′UTR and core information), genotype classification (1 or 6) remained inconclusive in 15% of samples. The locally available method (LightPower assay) failed to identify genotype 6 non-a/non-b, which highlights that methods using 5′UTR information only should not be used in Cambodia. Regional/national guidelines should be explicit about this. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was performed as part of a larger cross-sectional study on the burden of hepatitis C coinfection in HIV patients in Cambodia (Clinical.trials.gov: HCV-Epi NCT02361541).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7452997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74529972020-09-03 Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia De Weggheleire, Anja De Baetselier, Irith An, Sokkab Goletti, Sylvie Suin, Vanessa Thai, Sopheak Francque, Sven Crucitti, Tania Lynen, Lutgarde Van Gucht, Steven Kabamba, Benoît Mukadi Infect Dis Ther Brief Report INTRODUCTION: We aim to report on results and challenges of different methods used for hepatitis C (HCV) genotyping in a Cambodian HCV/HIV coinfection project. METHODS: Samples of 106 patients were available. HCV genotyping was initially (63 samples) done by the LightPower Taqman real-time PCR method (Viet A Corp.) and quality controlled using the Versant 2.0 line probe assay (Siemens Healthcare). Next, following interim quality control results, all 106 samples were (re)genotyped with Versant 2.0, complemented with 5′UTR/core sequencing for uninterpretable/incomplete Versant results. RESULTS: Using Versant, 103 (97.2%) of the 106 HCV-coinfected patients had an interpretable genotype result: 1b (50.5%), 6 non-a/non-b (30.1%), 1a (6.8%), 6a or b (4.9%), 2 (3.9%), 1 (2.9%) and 3 (1.0%). For 16 samples that were interpreted as genotype 1 or 1b per Versant's current instructions, it could not be excluded that it concerned a genotype 6 infection as the core region line patterns on the Versant test strip were unavailable, inconclusive or atypical. Upon sequencing, seven of these were genotyped as 1b and nine as genotype 6. Combining Versant and sequencing results, a definitive genotype was assigned in 104 patients: 1b (44.2%), 6 non-a/non-b (39.4%), 1a (6.7%), 6a or b (4.8%), 2 (3.8%) and 3 (1.0%). Genotyping by LightPower and Versant was discordant for 23 (of 63) samples. The LightPower assay misclassified all genotype 6 non-a/non-b samples as genotype 1, which indicates that this assay is only using 5′UTR information. CONCLUSIONS: HCV genotype 1b and genotype 6 non-a/non-b were most common. With Versant 2.0 (using 5′UTR and core information), genotype classification (1 or 6) remained inconclusive in 15% of samples. The locally available method (LightPower assay) failed to identify genotype 6 non-a/non-b, which highlights that methods using 5′UTR information only should not be used in Cambodia. Regional/national guidelines should be explicit about this. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was performed as part of a larger cross-sectional study on the burden of hepatitis C coinfection in HIV patients in Cambodia (Clinical.trials.gov: HCV-Epi NCT02361541). Springer Healthcare 2020-05-30 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7452997/ /pubmed/32474893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00304-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
De Weggheleire, Anja
De Baetselier, Irith
An, Sokkab
Goletti, Sylvie
Suin, Vanessa
Thai, Sopheak
Francque, Sven
Crucitti, Tania
Lynen, Lutgarde
Van Gucht, Steven
Kabamba, Benoît Mukadi
Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia
title Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia
title_full Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia
title_fullStr Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia
title_full_unstemmed Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia
title_short Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia
title_sort challenges to differentiate hepatitis c genotype 1 and 6: results from a field-study in cambodia
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00304-7
work_keys_str_mv AT deweggheleireanja challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT debaetselieririth challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT ansokkab challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT golettisylvie challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT suinvanessa challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT thaisopheak challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT francquesven challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT crucittitania challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT lynenlutgarde challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT vanguchtsteven challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia
AT kabambabenoitmukadi challengestodifferentiatehepatitiscgenotype1and6resultsfromafieldstudyincambodia