Cargando…

To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia

OBJECTIVES: Following a very rapid and significant uptake of metropolitan telepsychiatry in private practice in Australia during COVID-19, practical questions remain: How long should psychiatrists continue telepsychiatry? Are there benefits of continuing: reduced COVID-19 risks to patient and psychi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Looi, Jeffrey CL, Pring, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856220950081
_version_ 1783575301736890368
author Looi, Jeffrey CL
Pring, William
author_facet Looi, Jeffrey CL
Pring, William
author_sort Looi, Jeffrey CL
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Following a very rapid and significant uptake of metropolitan telepsychiatry in private practice in Australia during COVID-19, practical questions remain: How long should psychiatrists continue telepsychiatry? Are there benefits of continuing: reduced COVID-19 risks to patient and psychiatrist, and flexibility of appointments? Will the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items be retained? How does metropolitan telepsychiatry fit into the overall mix of public and private services? This is an important debate. CONCLUSIONS: Private psychiatrists may continue to offer the majority of care, where practical, via telepsychiatry to reduce COVID-19 exposure risks, as well as allow for the realities of practice management for pandemic public health measures. However, consideration has to be given to the potential drawbacks for patients with sight, hearing and illness-related disabilities or risks, when in-person consultation is required. There are also risks: some patients may not benefit from telepsychiatry due to the nature of their illness, and will patients feel rapport is lost? However, the retention of COVID-19 MBS telehealth items is needed for ongoing flexible and comprehensive private practice psychiatry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7453156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74531562020-08-31 To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia Looi, Jeffrey CL Pring, William Australas Psychiatry Covid-19 OBJECTIVES: Following a very rapid and significant uptake of metropolitan telepsychiatry in private practice in Australia during COVID-19, practical questions remain: How long should psychiatrists continue telepsychiatry? Are there benefits of continuing: reduced COVID-19 risks to patient and psychiatrist, and flexibility of appointments? Will the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items be retained? How does metropolitan telepsychiatry fit into the overall mix of public and private services? This is an important debate. CONCLUSIONS: Private psychiatrists may continue to offer the majority of care, where practical, via telepsychiatry to reduce COVID-19 exposure risks, as well as allow for the realities of practice management for pandemic public health measures. However, consideration has to be given to the potential drawbacks for patients with sight, hearing and illness-related disabilities or risks, when in-person consultation is required. There are also risks: some patients may not benefit from telepsychiatry due to the nature of their illness, and will patients feel rapport is lost? However, the retention of COVID-19 MBS telehealth items is needed for ongoing flexible and comprehensive private practice psychiatry. SAGE Publications 2020-08-26 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7453156/ /pubmed/32847378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856220950081 Text en © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Covid-19
Looi, Jeffrey CL
Pring, William
To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia
title To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia
title_full To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia
title_fullStr To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia
title_full_unstemmed To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia
title_short To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia
title_sort to tele- or not to telehealth? ongoing covid-19 challenges for private psychiatry in australia
topic Covid-19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856220950081
work_keys_str_mv AT looijeffreycl toteleornottotelehealthongoingcovid19challengesforprivatepsychiatryinaustralia
AT pringwilliam toteleornottotelehealthongoingcovid19challengesforprivatepsychiatryinaustralia