Cargando…
To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia
OBJECTIVES: Following a very rapid and significant uptake of metropolitan telepsychiatry in private practice in Australia during COVID-19, practical questions remain: How long should psychiatrists continue telepsychiatry? Are there benefits of continuing: reduced COVID-19 risks to patient and psychi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856220950081 |
_version_ | 1783575301736890368 |
---|---|
author | Looi, Jeffrey CL Pring, William |
author_facet | Looi, Jeffrey CL Pring, William |
author_sort | Looi, Jeffrey CL |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Following a very rapid and significant uptake of metropolitan telepsychiatry in private practice in Australia during COVID-19, practical questions remain: How long should psychiatrists continue telepsychiatry? Are there benefits of continuing: reduced COVID-19 risks to patient and psychiatrist, and flexibility of appointments? Will the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items be retained? How does metropolitan telepsychiatry fit into the overall mix of public and private services? This is an important debate. CONCLUSIONS: Private psychiatrists may continue to offer the majority of care, where practical, via telepsychiatry to reduce COVID-19 exposure risks, as well as allow for the realities of practice management for pandemic public health measures. However, consideration has to be given to the potential drawbacks for patients with sight, hearing and illness-related disabilities or risks, when in-person consultation is required. There are also risks: some patients may not benefit from telepsychiatry due to the nature of their illness, and will patients feel rapport is lost? However, the retention of COVID-19 MBS telehealth items is needed for ongoing flexible and comprehensive private practice psychiatry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7453156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74531562020-08-31 To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia Looi, Jeffrey CL Pring, William Australas Psychiatry Covid-19 OBJECTIVES: Following a very rapid and significant uptake of metropolitan telepsychiatry in private practice in Australia during COVID-19, practical questions remain: How long should psychiatrists continue telepsychiatry? Are there benefits of continuing: reduced COVID-19 risks to patient and psychiatrist, and flexibility of appointments? Will the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items be retained? How does metropolitan telepsychiatry fit into the overall mix of public and private services? This is an important debate. CONCLUSIONS: Private psychiatrists may continue to offer the majority of care, where practical, via telepsychiatry to reduce COVID-19 exposure risks, as well as allow for the realities of practice management for pandemic public health measures. However, consideration has to be given to the potential drawbacks for patients with sight, hearing and illness-related disabilities or risks, when in-person consultation is required. There are also risks: some patients may not benefit from telepsychiatry due to the nature of their illness, and will patients feel rapport is lost? However, the retention of COVID-19 MBS telehealth items is needed for ongoing flexible and comprehensive private practice psychiatry. SAGE Publications 2020-08-26 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7453156/ /pubmed/32847378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856220950081 Text en © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Covid-19 Looi, Jeffrey CL Pring, William To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia |
title | To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia |
title_full | To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia |
title_fullStr | To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia |
title_short | To tele- or not to telehealth? Ongoing COVID-19 challenges for private psychiatry in Australia |
title_sort | to tele- or not to telehealth? ongoing covid-19 challenges for private psychiatry in australia |
topic | Covid-19 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856220950081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT looijeffreycl toteleornottotelehealthongoingcovid19challengesforprivatepsychiatryinaustralia AT pringwilliam toteleornottotelehealthongoingcovid19challengesforprivatepsychiatryinaustralia |