Cargando…

External fixation and Kirschner wires in the treatment of paediatric displaced supracondylar femur fractures

PURPOSE: Kirschner-wire fixation (KF) and external fixation (EF) for the treatment of displaced supracondylar femur fractures (SFFs) were demonstrated respectively in previous reports. However, there is no paucity of convincing information on better treatment options for children. The aim of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jin, Yue, Changjie, Wang, Hai-Qiang, Guo, Xikai, Chen, Kailei, Ma, Jiewen, Wang, Jing, Tang, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.200050
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Kirschner-wire fixation (KF) and external fixation (EF) for the treatment of displaced supracondylar femur fractures (SFFs) were demonstrated respectively in previous reports. However, there is no paucity of convincing information on better treatment options for children. The aim of this study was to show results of KF and EF in the treatment of paediatric SFFs according to clinical and radiological outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis including 22 displaced closed SFFs was performed. A total of 12 patients were treated with KF, other ten patients were treated with EF. All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. Demographic data, surgical outcomes and postoperative knee function using the Knee Society Score (KSS) scale were evaluated in this research. RESULTS: The patients in the KF group were significantly younger than in the EF group (p < 0.001). The KF group had superiority in operative time (p = 0.001), blood loss (p = 0.027) and length of hospital stay (p = 0.001). Clinical healing outcome did not differ between the two groups. The KF group achieved radiological union in a shorter period (p < 0.001), with a better range of movement (ROM) and KSS postoperative score. CONCLUSION: Both KF and EF can achieve excellent outcomes for paediatric SFFs. KF has many advantages in younger children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV