Cargando…

Role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol

BACKGROUND: A critical barrier to improving the quality of end-of-life (EOL) cancer care is our lack of understanding of the mechanisms underlying variation in EOL treatment intensity. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying 1) organizational and provider practice norms at major US cancer ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knutzen, Kristin E., Schifferdecker, Karen E., Murray, Genevra F., Alam, Shama S., Brooks, Gabriel A., Kapadia, Nirav S., Butcher, Rebecca, Barnato, Amber E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32854691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00641-x
_version_ 1783575373822296064
author Knutzen, Kristin E.
Schifferdecker, Karen E.
Murray, Genevra F.
Alam, Shama S.
Brooks, Gabriel A.
Kapadia, Nirav S.
Butcher, Rebecca
Barnato, Amber E.
author_facet Knutzen, Kristin E.
Schifferdecker, Karen E.
Murray, Genevra F.
Alam, Shama S.
Brooks, Gabriel A.
Kapadia, Nirav S.
Butcher, Rebecca
Barnato, Amber E.
author_sort Knutzen, Kristin E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A critical barrier to improving the quality of end-of-life (EOL) cancer care is our lack of understanding of the mechanisms underlying variation in EOL treatment intensity. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying 1) organizational and provider practice norms at major US cancer centers, and 2) how these norms influence provider decision making heuristics and patient expectations for EOL care, particularly for minority patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: This is a multi-center, qualitative case study at six National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comprehensive Cancer Centers. We will theoretically sample centers based upon National Quality Forum (NQF) endorsed EOL quality metrics and demographics to ensure heterogeneity in EOL intensity and region. A multidisciplinary team of clinician and non-clinician researchers will conduct direct observations, semi-structured interviews, and artifact collection. Participants will include: 1) cancer center and clinical service line administrators; 2) providers from medical, surgical, and radiation oncology; palliative or supportive care; intensive care; hospital medicine; and emergency medicine who see patients with cancer and have high clinical practice volume or high local influence (provider interviews and observations); and 3) adult patients with metastatic solid tumors and whom the provider would not be surprised if they died in the next 12 months and their caregivers (patient and caregiver interviews). Leadership interviews will probe about EOL institutional norms and organization. We will observe inpatient and outpatient care for two weeks. Provider interviews will use vignettes to probe explicit and implicit motivations for treatment choices. Semi-structured interviews with patients near EOL, or their family members and caregivers will explore past, current, and future decisions related to their cancer care. We will import transcribed field notes and interviews into Dedoose software for qualitative data management and analysis, and we will develop and apply a deductive and inductive codebook to the data. DISCUSSION: This study aims to improve our understanding of organizational and provider practice norms pertinent to EOL care in U.S. cancer centers. This research will ultimately be used to inform a provider-oriented intervention to improve EOL care for racial and ethnic minority patients with advanced cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03780816; December 19, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7453548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74535482020-08-28 Role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol Knutzen, Kristin E. Schifferdecker, Karen E. Murray, Genevra F. Alam, Shama S. Brooks, Gabriel A. Kapadia, Nirav S. Butcher, Rebecca Barnato, Amber E. BMC Palliat Care Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A critical barrier to improving the quality of end-of-life (EOL) cancer care is our lack of understanding of the mechanisms underlying variation in EOL treatment intensity. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying 1) organizational and provider practice norms at major US cancer centers, and 2) how these norms influence provider decision making heuristics and patient expectations for EOL care, particularly for minority patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: This is a multi-center, qualitative case study at six National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comprehensive Cancer Centers. We will theoretically sample centers based upon National Quality Forum (NQF) endorsed EOL quality metrics and demographics to ensure heterogeneity in EOL intensity and region. A multidisciplinary team of clinician and non-clinician researchers will conduct direct observations, semi-structured interviews, and artifact collection. Participants will include: 1) cancer center and clinical service line administrators; 2) providers from medical, surgical, and radiation oncology; palliative or supportive care; intensive care; hospital medicine; and emergency medicine who see patients with cancer and have high clinical practice volume or high local influence (provider interviews and observations); and 3) adult patients with metastatic solid tumors and whom the provider would not be surprised if they died in the next 12 months and their caregivers (patient and caregiver interviews). Leadership interviews will probe about EOL institutional norms and organization. We will observe inpatient and outpatient care for two weeks. Provider interviews will use vignettes to probe explicit and implicit motivations for treatment choices. Semi-structured interviews with patients near EOL, or their family members and caregivers will explore past, current, and future decisions related to their cancer care. We will import transcribed field notes and interviews into Dedoose software for qualitative data management and analysis, and we will develop and apply a deductive and inductive codebook to the data. DISCUSSION: This study aims to improve our understanding of organizational and provider practice norms pertinent to EOL care in U.S. cancer centers. This research will ultimately be used to inform a provider-oriented intervention to improve EOL care for racial and ethnic minority patients with advanced cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03780816; December 19, 2018. BioMed Central 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7453548/ /pubmed/32854691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00641-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Knutzen, Kristin E.
Schifferdecker, Karen E.
Murray, Genevra F.
Alam, Shama S.
Brooks, Gabriel A.
Kapadia, Nirav S.
Butcher, Rebecca
Barnato, Amber E.
Role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol
title Role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol
title_full Role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol
title_fullStr Role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol
title_short Role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol
title_sort role of norms in variation in cancer centers’ end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32854691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00641-x
work_keys_str_mv AT knutzenkristine roleofnormsinvariationincancercentersendoflifequalityqualitativecasestudyprotocol
AT schifferdeckerkarene roleofnormsinvariationincancercentersendoflifequalityqualitativecasestudyprotocol
AT murraygenevraf roleofnormsinvariationincancercentersendoflifequalityqualitativecasestudyprotocol
AT alamshamas roleofnormsinvariationincancercentersendoflifequalityqualitativecasestudyprotocol
AT brooksgabriela roleofnormsinvariationincancercentersendoflifequalityqualitativecasestudyprotocol
AT kapadianiravs roleofnormsinvariationincancercentersendoflifequalityqualitativecasestudyprotocol
AT butcherrebecca roleofnormsinvariationincancercentersendoflifequalityqualitativecasestudyprotocol
AT barnatoambere roleofnormsinvariationincancercentersendoflifequalityqualitativecasestudyprotocol