Cargando…

Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of ovarian cancer patients are living longer and requiring regular follow-up to detect disease recurrence. New models of follow-up care are needed to meet the growing number and needs of this patient group. The potential for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shearsmith, Leanne, Kennedy, Fiona, Lindner, Oana C., Velikova, Galina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00237-2
_version_ 1783575399791329280
author Shearsmith, Leanne
Kennedy, Fiona
Lindner, Oana C.
Velikova, Galina
author_facet Shearsmith, Leanne
Kennedy, Fiona
Lindner, Oana C.
Velikova, Galina
author_sort Shearsmith, Leanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of ovarian cancer patients are living longer and requiring regular follow-up to detect disease recurrence. New models of follow-up care are needed to meet the growing number and needs of this patient group. The potential for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to capture key symptoms and online technology to facilitate long-term follow-up has been suggested. OBJECTIVES: Prior to a pilot study exploring the potential for electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring, the content of an online intervention was developed via Delphi methodology. DESIGN AND SETTING: A Delphi process was conducted aiming to obtain consensus amongst the clinicians and patients from 4 hospitals on the key aspects to monitor during follow-up after ovarian cancer treatment, and how to monitor them in an online intervention. A two round Delphi was conducted. Consensus was defined as at least 70% agreement. RESULTS: Out of 43 participants, 30 (18 patients, 12 healthcare professionals) completed round 1 and 19 (11 patients, 8 healthcare professionals) completed round 2. Consensus was reached on the key symptoms to monitor, and the importance of monitoring both duration and frequency of symptoms. Opportunity for review of psychological wellbeing and holistic needs were considered important by both groups. The frequency of online questionnaire completion, timeframe for patients to reflect on (e.g. during the past X weeks), and the choice of PROMs items to monitor symptoms did not reach the consensus threshold. CONCLUSION: It is crucial that any intervention and the selection of PROMs is fully described to ensure transparency about the development and decisions taken. In this work, a set of key symptoms and areas to monitor were agreed, which has informed the design of an online intervention and a subsequent pilot study is now underway. The proposed model of remote follow-up using electronic PROMs could be adapted and explored in other cancer sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7453693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74536932020-08-28 Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment Shearsmith, Leanne Kennedy, Fiona Lindner, Oana C. Velikova, Galina J Patient Rep Outcomes Short Report BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of ovarian cancer patients are living longer and requiring regular follow-up to detect disease recurrence. New models of follow-up care are needed to meet the growing number and needs of this patient group. The potential for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to capture key symptoms and online technology to facilitate long-term follow-up has been suggested. OBJECTIVES: Prior to a pilot study exploring the potential for electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring, the content of an online intervention was developed via Delphi methodology. DESIGN AND SETTING: A Delphi process was conducted aiming to obtain consensus amongst the clinicians and patients from 4 hospitals on the key aspects to monitor during follow-up after ovarian cancer treatment, and how to monitor them in an online intervention. A two round Delphi was conducted. Consensus was defined as at least 70% agreement. RESULTS: Out of 43 participants, 30 (18 patients, 12 healthcare professionals) completed round 1 and 19 (11 patients, 8 healthcare professionals) completed round 2. Consensus was reached on the key symptoms to monitor, and the importance of monitoring both duration and frequency of symptoms. Opportunity for review of psychological wellbeing and holistic needs were considered important by both groups. The frequency of online questionnaire completion, timeframe for patients to reflect on (e.g. during the past X weeks), and the choice of PROMs items to monitor symptoms did not reach the consensus threshold. CONCLUSION: It is crucial that any intervention and the selection of PROMs is fully described to ensure transparency about the development and decisions taken. In this work, a set of key symptoms and areas to monitor were agreed, which has informed the design of an online intervention and a subsequent pilot study is now underway. The proposed model of remote follow-up using electronic PROMs could be adapted and explored in other cancer sites. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7453693/ /pubmed/32857244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00237-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Short Report
Shearsmith, Leanne
Kennedy, Fiona
Lindner, Oana C.
Velikova, Galina
Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment
title Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment
title_full Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment
title_fullStr Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment
title_full_unstemmed Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment
title_short Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment
title_sort delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00237-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shearsmithleanne delphisurveytoinformpatientreportedsymptommonitoringafterovariancancertreatment
AT kennedyfiona delphisurveytoinformpatientreportedsymptommonitoringafterovariancancertreatment
AT lindneroanac delphisurveytoinformpatientreportedsymptommonitoringafterovariancancertreatment
AT velikovagalina delphisurveytoinformpatientreportedsymptommonitoringafterovariancancertreatment