Cargando…
A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of root‐shape inserts mounted on a reciprocating handpiece during the procedure of root surface debridement (RSD) on extracted teeth. Three different approaches were compared: ultrasonic scaling, employment of root‐shape inserts mounted on a r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.299 |
_version_ | 1783575416642994176 |
---|---|
author | Dassatti, Leonardo Manicone, Paolo Francesco Lauricella, Selenia Pastorino, Roberta Filetici, Pierfrancesco Nicoletti, Fabrizio D'Addona, Antonio |
author_facet | Dassatti, Leonardo Manicone, Paolo Francesco Lauricella, Selenia Pastorino, Roberta Filetici, Pierfrancesco Nicoletti, Fabrizio D'Addona, Antonio |
author_sort | Dassatti, Leonardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of root‐shape inserts mounted on a reciprocating handpiece during the procedure of root surface debridement (RSD) on extracted teeth. Three different approaches were compared: ultrasonic scaling, employment of root‐shape inserts mounted on a reciprocating handpiece, and a combination of both. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 extracted teeth were divided into three groups. The first group was instrumented with an ultrasonic scaler, the second group with flexible root‐shape inserts mounted on a reciprocating handpiece (grain size 40, 15, and 4 μm), whereas the final group underwent a combination of both approaches. The time required for the instrumentation was taken. The specimens were subjected to optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the photographs were evaluated by three examiners who were blinded to the study. The parameters included were: SEM roughness index (SRI) for the roughness calculation, remaining calculus Index (RCI) to evaluate the residual calculus deposits, and loss of tooth substance index (LTSI) to evaluate the loss of tooth substance caused by instrumentation. RESULT: The results revealed that the time taken for the instrumentation was on average longer when the root‐shape inserts were employed alone, meanwhile the combined approach did not show significant difference in comparison with the ultrasonic scaling. The lower average RCI was obtained with a combined approach. The use of root‐shape inserts seems to cause a moderate increase in LTSI, especially in a combined approach, whereas it resulted in a better average SRI. CONCLUSION: The employment of root‐shape inserts seems to be effective in the RSD for its ability to obtain a smooth and calculus‐free instrumented surface, especially when used in combination with an ultrasonic scaler, and their use can so represent a valid approach to be tested in further in vivo studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7453770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74537702020-09-02 A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement Dassatti, Leonardo Manicone, Paolo Francesco Lauricella, Selenia Pastorino, Roberta Filetici, Pierfrancesco Nicoletti, Fabrizio D'Addona, Antonio Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of root‐shape inserts mounted on a reciprocating handpiece during the procedure of root surface debridement (RSD) on extracted teeth. Three different approaches were compared: ultrasonic scaling, employment of root‐shape inserts mounted on a reciprocating handpiece, and a combination of both. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 extracted teeth were divided into three groups. The first group was instrumented with an ultrasonic scaler, the second group with flexible root‐shape inserts mounted on a reciprocating handpiece (grain size 40, 15, and 4 μm), whereas the final group underwent a combination of both approaches. The time required for the instrumentation was taken. The specimens were subjected to optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the photographs were evaluated by three examiners who were blinded to the study. The parameters included were: SEM roughness index (SRI) for the roughness calculation, remaining calculus Index (RCI) to evaluate the residual calculus deposits, and loss of tooth substance index (LTSI) to evaluate the loss of tooth substance caused by instrumentation. RESULT: The results revealed that the time taken for the instrumentation was on average longer when the root‐shape inserts were employed alone, meanwhile the combined approach did not show significant difference in comparison with the ultrasonic scaling. The lower average RCI was obtained with a combined approach. The use of root‐shape inserts seems to cause a moderate increase in LTSI, especially in a combined approach, whereas it resulted in a better average SRI. CONCLUSION: The employment of root‐shape inserts seems to be effective in the RSD for its ability to obtain a smooth and calculus‐free instrumented surface, especially when used in combination with an ultrasonic scaler, and their use can so represent a valid approach to be tested in further in vivo studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7453770/ /pubmed/32573120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.299 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Dassatti, Leonardo Manicone, Paolo Francesco Lauricella, Selenia Pastorino, Roberta Filetici, Pierfrancesco Nicoletti, Fabrizio D'Addona, Antonio A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement |
title | A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement |
title_full | A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement |
title_fullStr | A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement |
title_short | A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement |
title_sort | comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dassattileonardo acomparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT maniconepaolofrancesco acomparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT lauricellaselenia acomparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT pastorinoroberta acomparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT fileticipierfrancesco acomparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT nicolettifabrizio acomparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT daddonaantonio acomparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT dassattileonardo comparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT maniconepaolofrancesco comparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT lauricellaselenia comparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT pastorinoroberta comparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT fileticipierfrancesco comparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT nicolettifabrizio comparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement AT daddonaantonio comparativescanningelectronmicroscopystudybetweentheeffectofanultrasonicscalerreciprocatinghandpieceandcombinedapproachontherootsurfacetopographyinsubgingivaldebridement |