Cargando…

Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to measure the thickness of the palatal mucosa in a Jordanian (Middle Eastern) population as well as identify possible factors that may influence the thickness of palatal mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty period on tally healthy subjects (29 males and 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Said, Khalid N., Abu Khalid, Areej S., Farook, Fathima F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32329230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.298
_version_ 1783575417601392640
author Said, Khalid N.
Abu Khalid, Areej S.
Farook, Fathima F.
author_facet Said, Khalid N.
Abu Khalid, Areej S.
Farook, Fathima F.
author_sort Said, Khalid N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to measure the thickness of the palatal mucosa in a Jordanian (Middle Eastern) population as well as identify possible factors that may influence the thickness of palatal mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty period on tally healthy subjects (29 males and 31 females) were selected. Fifteen measurement points were defined on the palate. The mucosal thickness in the hard palate was determined by “bone sounding” with a Hu‐Friedy® round periodontal probe. RESULTS: The overall mean thickness of the palatal masticatory mucosa was 3.23 ± 0.47 mm.The mean thickness increased from the gingival margin to a more apical position irrespective of the tooth measured or side of the mouth in the following sequence: canine, second molar, first premolar, second premolar and lastly, the first molar. No significant difference between gender, smoking status, gingival phenotype andsides of the mouth with the thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa was determined. A significant difference between palatal shape and palatal gingival thickness was found. CONCLUSIONS: The most appropriate site for graft harvesting is the canine‐premolar area 8‐13 mm from the mid‐palatal aspect of each respective tooth in a Jordanian population. Except for the palatal shape, the side of the mouth, smoking, gender or gingival phenotype does not affect the graft harvest. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:   SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE FOR STUDY: Knowledge on the thickness of the masticatory mucosa is crucialin making decisions for surgical treatment modality and may affect surgical outcome. We measured the thickness of the palatal mucosa in a Jordanian population and identified possible influencing factors. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The thickness varied according to the teeth and the canine to premolar region was found to be the appropriate donor site. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This information on safe zone for graft harvest can guide the periodontist to make appropriate incisions and choose the appropriate location to obtain a graft of adequate thickness and dimensions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7453774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74537742020-09-02 Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study Said, Khalid N. Abu Khalid, Areej S. Farook, Fathima F. Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to measure the thickness of the palatal mucosa in a Jordanian (Middle Eastern) population as well as identify possible factors that may influence the thickness of palatal mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty period on tally healthy subjects (29 males and 31 females) were selected. Fifteen measurement points were defined on the palate. The mucosal thickness in the hard palate was determined by “bone sounding” with a Hu‐Friedy® round periodontal probe. RESULTS: The overall mean thickness of the palatal masticatory mucosa was 3.23 ± 0.47 mm.The mean thickness increased from the gingival margin to a more apical position irrespective of the tooth measured or side of the mouth in the following sequence: canine, second molar, first premolar, second premolar and lastly, the first molar. No significant difference between gender, smoking status, gingival phenotype andsides of the mouth with the thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa was determined. A significant difference between palatal shape and palatal gingival thickness was found. CONCLUSIONS: The most appropriate site for graft harvesting is the canine‐premolar area 8‐13 mm from the mid‐palatal aspect of each respective tooth in a Jordanian population. Except for the palatal shape, the side of the mouth, smoking, gender or gingival phenotype does not affect the graft harvest. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:   SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE FOR STUDY: Knowledge on the thickness of the masticatory mucosa is crucialin making decisions for surgical treatment modality and may affect surgical outcome. We measured the thickness of the palatal mucosa in a Jordanian population and identified possible influencing factors. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The thickness varied according to the teeth and the canine to premolar region was found to be the appropriate donor site. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This information on safe zone for graft harvest can guide the periodontist to make appropriate incisions and choose the appropriate location to obtain a graft of adequate thickness and dimensions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7453774/ /pubmed/32329230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.298 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Said, Khalid N.
Abu Khalid, Areej S.
Farook, Fathima F.
Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study
title Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study
title_full Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study
title_fullStr Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study
title_short Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study
title_sort anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. a clinical study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32329230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.298
work_keys_str_mv AT saidkhalidn anatomicfactorsinfluencingdimensionsofsofttissuegraftfromthehardpalateaclinicalstudy
AT abukhalidareejs anatomicfactorsinfluencingdimensionsofsofttissuegraftfromthehardpalateaclinicalstudy
AT farookfathimaf anatomicfactorsinfluencingdimensionsofsofttissuegraftfromthehardpalateaclinicalstudy