Cargando…

Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Six Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral bisphosphonates in increasing bone mineral density (BMD), reducing fractures, and improving clinical function in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). METHODS: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ying, Zhi‐min, Hu, Bin, Yan, Shi‐gui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12611
_version_ 1783575471043117056
author Ying, Zhi‐min
Hu, Bin
Yan, Shi‐gui
author_facet Ying, Zhi‐min
Hu, Bin
Yan, Shi‐gui
author_sort Ying, Zhi‐min
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral bisphosphonates in increasing bone mineral density (BMD), reducing fractures, and improving clinical function in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). METHODS: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials of directly comparing oral bisphosphonate therapy with placebo‐group in OI patients. Data synthesis regarding to bone mineral density as measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA), decreased fracture incidence, change in biochemical markers of bone and mineral metabolism, bone histology, growth, bone pain, quality of life, and others were assessed, and meta‐analysis done when possible. RESULTS: From 98 potential references and six randomized controlled studies a total of 263 participants receiving oral bisphosphonates and 143 placebo treatments contributed data to meta‐analysis. Pooled meta‐analysis of three studies suggested that there was significant difference between bisphosphonate treated group and placebo in number of patients with at least one fracture (mean difference 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.32–0.89, P = 0.02). Pooled meta‐analysis of two studies suggested that significant difference was noted between bisphosphonate treated group and placebo in mean percentage change in spine BMD (T‐score) (mean difference 28.43, 95% confidence interval 7.09‐49.77, P = 0.009). The similar effect was shown in the term of mean change (Z‐score) in spine BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in lumbar areal BMD in patients affected with OI has been shown when treated with oral bisphosphonates, even though only a small population was enrolled. We cannot draw a definite conclusion that the increase in BMD can be translated into fracture reduction and clinical functional improvement. The optimal method, dose, type, initiation, and duration of oral bisphosphonates therapy still remains unclear. Well‐designed, adequately‐powered, placebo‐controlled RCTs investigating the effects of oral bisphosphonates on fractures reduction and improvement in quality of life in both children and adults are studied here.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7454147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74541472020-09-02 Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Six Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trials Ying, Zhi‐min Hu, Bin Yan, Shi‐gui Orthop Surg Scientific Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral bisphosphonates in increasing bone mineral density (BMD), reducing fractures, and improving clinical function in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). METHODS: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials of directly comparing oral bisphosphonate therapy with placebo‐group in OI patients. Data synthesis regarding to bone mineral density as measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA), decreased fracture incidence, change in biochemical markers of bone and mineral metabolism, bone histology, growth, bone pain, quality of life, and others were assessed, and meta‐analysis done when possible. RESULTS: From 98 potential references and six randomized controlled studies a total of 263 participants receiving oral bisphosphonates and 143 placebo treatments contributed data to meta‐analysis. Pooled meta‐analysis of three studies suggested that there was significant difference between bisphosphonate treated group and placebo in number of patients with at least one fracture (mean difference 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.32–0.89, P = 0.02). Pooled meta‐analysis of two studies suggested that significant difference was noted between bisphosphonate treated group and placebo in mean percentage change in spine BMD (T‐score) (mean difference 28.43, 95% confidence interval 7.09‐49.77, P = 0.009). The similar effect was shown in the term of mean change (Z‐score) in spine BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in lumbar areal BMD in patients affected with OI has been shown when treated with oral bisphosphonates, even though only a small population was enrolled. We cannot draw a definite conclusion that the increase in BMD can be translated into fracture reduction and clinical functional improvement. The optimal method, dose, type, initiation, and duration of oral bisphosphonates therapy still remains unclear. Well‐designed, adequately‐powered, placebo‐controlled RCTs investigating the effects of oral bisphosphonates on fractures reduction and improvement in quality of life in both children and adults are studied here. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7454147/ /pubmed/32589343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12611 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Ying, Zhi‐min
Hu, Bin
Yan, Shi‐gui
Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Six Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trials
title Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Six Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trials
title_full Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Six Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Six Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Six Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trials
title_short Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Six Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trials
title_sort oral bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of six randomized placebo‐controlled trials
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12611
work_keys_str_mv AT yingzhimin oralbisphosphonatetherapyforosteogenesisimperfectaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsixrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrials
AT hubin oralbisphosphonatetherapyforosteogenesisimperfectaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsixrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrials
AT yanshigui oralbisphosphonatetherapyforosteogenesisimperfectaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsixrandomizedplacebocontrolledtrials