Cargando…

Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND: Despite the general belief of the benefits and the widespread use of massage in sport field, there are limited empirical data on possible effectiveness of massage on psychological and physical functional variables. PURPOSE: The main objective of the present study was to compare the effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Espí-López, Gemma V., Serra-Añó, Pilar, Cuenca-Martínez, Ferran, Suso-Martí, Luis, Inglés, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Multimed Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922579
_version_ 1783575485169532928
author Espí-López, Gemma V.
Serra-Añó, Pilar
Cuenca-Martínez, Ferran
Suso-Martí, Luis
Inglés, Marta
author_facet Espí-López, Gemma V.
Serra-Añó, Pilar
Cuenca-Martínez, Ferran
Suso-Martí, Luis
Inglés, Marta
author_sort Espí-López, Gemma V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the general belief of the benefits and the widespread use of massage in sport field, there are limited empirical data on possible effectiveness of massage on psychological and physical functional variables. PURPOSE: The main objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of classical and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes. SETTING: Athletic club of Valencia PARTICIPANTS: 20 amateur athletes were recruited from two athletic clubs. RESEARCH DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized, pilot-placebo trial. INTERVENTION: The subjects were randomly allocated to two different groups: a) Massage group (MG) (n=10); b) Control group (CG) (n=10). The intervention period lasted one month (one session per week). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of the participants was performed at baseline and 24 hours following the completion of the intervention. Outcome measures included hip flexion, knee extension, and mood state. RESULTS: The results suggest that MG obtained better results on physical variables (p < .05). However, for both groups, trends suggest significant improvements in the overall mood state of the participants (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that classic massage could be an effective intervention to improve functional physical variables in athletes. However, trends suggest that a light touch intervention could provoke improvements in physiological measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7454233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Multimed Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74542332020-09-11 Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial Espí-López, Gemma V. Serra-Añó, Pilar Cuenca-Martínez, Ferran Suso-Martí, Luis Inglés, Marta Int J Ther Massage Bodywork Research BACKGROUND: Despite the general belief of the benefits and the widespread use of massage in sport field, there are limited empirical data on possible effectiveness of massage on psychological and physical functional variables. PURPOSE: The main objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of classical and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes. SETTING: Athletic club of Valencia PARTICIPANTS: 20 amateur athletes were recruited from two athletic clubs. RESEARCH DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized, pilot-placebo trial. INTERVENTION: The subjects were randomly allocated to two different groups: a) Massage group (MG) (n=10); b) Control group (CG) (n=10). The intervention period lasted one month (one session per week). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of the participants was performed at baseline and 24 hours following the completion of the intervention. Outcome measures included hip flexion, knee extension, and mood state. RESULTS: The results suggest that MG obtained better results on physical variables (p < .05). However, for both groups, trends suggest significant improvements in the overall mood state of the participants (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that classic massage could be an effective intervention to improve functional physical variables in athletes. However, trends suggest that a light touch intervention could provoke improvements in physiological measures. Multimed Inc. 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7454233/ /pubmed/32922579 Text en Copyright© The Author(s) 2020. Published by the Massage Therapy Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Published under the CreativeCommons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Espí-López, Gemma V.
Serra-Añó, Pilar
Cuenca-Martínez, Ferran
Suso-Martí, Luis
Inglés, Marta
Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial
title Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial
title_full Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial
title_fullStr Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial
title_short Comparison Between Classic and Light Touch Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes: a Randomized Pilot Trial
title_sort comparison between classic and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes: a randomized pilot trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922579
work_keys_str_mv AT espilopezgemmav comparisonbetweenclassicandlighttouchmassageonpsychologicalandphysicalfunctionalvariablesinathletesarandomizedpilottrial
AT serraanopilar comparisonbetweenclassicandlighttouchmassageonpsychologicalandphysicalfunctionalvariablesinathletesarandomizedpilottrial
AT cuencamartinezferran comparisonbetweenclassicandlighttouchmassageonpsychologicalandphysicalfunctionalvariablesinathletesarandomizedpilottrial
AT susomartiluis comparisonbetweenclassicandlighttouchmassageonpsychologicalandphysicalfunctionalvariablesinathletesarandomizedpilottrial
AT inglesmarta comparisonbetweenclassicandlighttouchmassageonpsychologicalandphysicalfunctionalvariablesinathletesarandomizedpilottrial