Cargando…

Direct Evidence of Active SARS-CoV-2 Replication in the Intestine

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no direct evidence to prove the active replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the intestinal tract and relevant pathological changes in the colon and rectum. We investigated the presence of virions and pathological changes in su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qian, Qun, Fan, Lifang, Liu, Weicheng, Li, Jin, Yue, Junqiu, Wang, Mingwei, Ke, Xianliang, Yin, Yan, Chen, Quanjiao, Jiang, Congqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32638022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa925
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no direct evidence to prove the active replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the intestinal tract and relevant pathological changes in the colon and rectum. We investigated the presence of virions and pathological changes in surgical rectal tissues of a patient with clinically confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The clinical data were collected during hospitalization and follow-up of this patient. Quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerasechain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed on the rectal tissue specimens obtained from surgical resection, succus entericus and intestinal mucosa of ileostomy, and rectal mucosa during follow-up after recovery. Ultrathin sections of surgical samples were observed for SARS-CoV-2 virions using electron microscopy. Histopathological examination was performed using hematoxylin-eosin stain. Immunohistochemical analysis and immunofluorescence were carried out on rectal tissues to evaluate the distribution of SARS-CoV-2 antigen and immune cell infiltrations. RESULTS: The patient had fever and cough on day 3 postoperatively, was diagnosed with COVID-19 on day 7, and was discharged from the hospital on day 41. RNA of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in surgically resected rectal specimens but not in samples collected 37 days after discharge. Notably, coincident with rectal tissues of surgical specimens testing nucleic acid positive for SARS-CoV-2, typical coronavirus virions in rectal tissue were observed under electron microscopy. Moreover, abundant lymphocytes and macrophages (some were SARS-CoV-2 positive) infiltrating the lamina propria were found with no significant mucosal damage. CONCLUSIONS: We first report the direct evidence of active SARS-CoV-2 replication in a patient’s rectum during the incubation period, which might explain SARS-CoV-2 fecal–oral transmission.