Cargando…

Validation of MTL30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND: Valid indicators are required to measure surgical quality. These ideally should be sensitive and selective while being easy to understand and adjust. We propose here the MTL30 quality indicator which takes into account 30-day mortality, transfer within 30 days, and a length of stay of 30...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthes, Niels, Diers, Johannes, Schlegel, Nicolas, Hankir, Mohammed, Haubitz, Imme, Germer, Christoph-Thomas, Wiegering, Armin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238473
_version_ 1783575507235766272
author Matthes, Niels
Diers, Johannes
Schlegel, Nicolas
Hankir, Mohammed
Haubitz, Imme
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Wiegering, Armin
author_facet Matthes, Niels
Diers, Johannes
Schlegel, Nicolas
Hankir, Mohammed
Haubitz, Imme
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Wiegering, Armin
author_sort Matthes, Niels
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Valid indicators are required to measure surgical quality. These ideally should be sensitive and selective while being easy to understand and adjust. We propose here the MTL30 quality indicator which takes into account 30-day mortality, transfer within 30 days, and a length of stay of 30 days as composite markers of an uneventful operative/postoperative course. METHODS: Patients documented in the StuDoQ|Colon and StuDoQ|Rectal carcinoma register of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) were analyzed with regard to the effects of patient and tumor-related risk factors as well as postoperative complications on the MTL30. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the MTL30 correlated significantly with patient and tumor-related risk factors such as ASA score (p<0.001), age (p<0.001), or UICC stage (p<0.001). There was a high sensitivity for the postoperative occurrence of complications such as re-operations (p<0.001) or subsequent bleeding (p<0.001), as well as a significant correlation with the CDC classification (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, patient-related risk factors and postoperative complications significantly increased the odds ratio for a positive MTL30. A negative MTL30 showed a high specify for an uneventful operative and postoperative course. CONCLUSION: The MTL30 is a valid indicator of colorectal surgical quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7454590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74545902020-09-02 Validation of MTL30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery Matthes, Niels Diers, Johannes Schlegel, Nicolas Hankir, Mohammed Haubitz, Imme Germer, Christoph-Thomas Wiegering, Armin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Valid indicators are required to measure surgical quality. These ideally should be sensitive and selective while being easy to understand and adjust. We propose here the MTL30 quality indicator which takes into account 30-day mortality, transfer within 30 days, and a length of stay of 30 days as composite markers of an uneventful operative/postoperative course. METHODS: Patients documented in the StuDoQ|Colon and StuDoQ|Rectal carcinoma register of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) were analyzed with regard to the effects of patient and tumor-related risk factors as well as postoperative complications on the MTL30. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the MTL30 correlated significantly with patient and tumor-related risk factors such as ASA score (p<0.001), age (p<0.001), or UICC stage (p<0.001). There was a high sensitivity for the postoperative occurrence of complications such as re-operations (p<0.001) or subsequent bleeding (p<0.001), as well as a significant correlation with the CDC classification (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, patient-related risk factors and postoperative complications significantly increased the odds ratio for a positive MTL30. A negative MTL30 showed a high specify for an uneventful operative and postoperative course. CONCLUSION: The MTL30 is a valid indicator of colorectal surgical quality. Public Library of Science 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7454590/ /pubmed/32857807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238473 Text en © 2020 Matthes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matthes, Niels
Diers, Johannes
Schlegel, Nicolas
Hankir, Mohammed
Haubitz, Imme
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Wiegering, Armin
Validation of MTL30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery
title Validation of MTL30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery
title_full Validation of MTL30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery
title_fullStr Validation of MTL30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Validation of MTL30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery
title_short Validation of MTL30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery
title_sort validation of mtl30 as a quality indicator for colorectal surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238473
work_keys_str_mv AT matthesniels validationofmtl30asaqualityindicatorforcolorectalsurgery
AT diersjohannes validationofmtl30asaqualityindicatorforcolorectalsurgery
AT schlegelnicolas validationofmtl30asaqualityindicatorforcolorectalsurgery
AT hankirmohammed validationofmtl30asaqualityindicatorforcolorectalsurgery
AT haubitzimme validationofmtl30asaqualityindicatorforcolorectalsurgery
AT germerchristophthomas validationofmtl30asaqualityindicatorforcolorectalsurgery
AT wiegeringarmin validationofmtl30asaqualityindicatorforcolorectalsurgery