Cargando…

Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials

Most tobacco-focused clinical trials are based on locally conducted studies that face significant challenges to implementation and successful execution. These challenges include the need for large, diverse, yet still representative study samples. This often means a protracted, costly, and inefficien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahne, Jennifer, Tomko, Rachel L, McClure, Erin A, Obeid, Jihad S, Carpenter, Matthew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa105
_version_ 1783575524737548288
author Dahne, Jennifer
Tomko, Rachel L
McClure, Erin A
Obeid, Jihad S
Carpenter, Matthew J
author_facet Dahne, Jennifer
Tomko, Rachel L
McClure, Erin A
Obeid, Jihad S
Carpenter, Matthew J
author_sort Dahne, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Most tobacco-focused clinical trials are based on locally conducted studies that face significant challenges to implementation and successful execution. These challenges include the need for large, diverse, yet still representative study samples. This often means a protracted, costly, and inefficient recruitment process. Multisite clinical trials can overcome some of these hurdles but incur their own unique challenges. With recent advances in mobile health and digital technologies, there is now a promising alternative: Remote Trials. These trials are led and coordinated by a local investigative team, but are based remotely, within a given community, state, or even nation. The remote approach affords many of the benefits of multisite trials (more efficient recruitment of larger study samples) without the same barriers (cost, multisite management, and regulatory hurdles). The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global health pandemic has resulted in rapid requirements to shift ongoing clinical trials to remote delivery and assessment platforms, making methods for the conduct of remote trials even more timely. The purpose of the present review is to provide an overview of available methods for the conduct of remote tobacco-focused clinical trials as well as illustrative examples of how these methods have been implemented across recently completed and ongoing tobacco studies. We focus on key aspects of the clinical trial pipeline including remote: (1) study recruitment and screening, (2) informed consent, (3) assessment, (4) biomarker collection, and (5) medication adherence monitoring. Implications With recent advances in mobile health and digital technologies, remote trials now offer a promising alternative to traditional in-person clinical trials. Remote trials afford expedient recruitment of large, demographically representative study samples, without undo burden to a research team. The present review provides an overview of available methods for the conduct of remote tobacco-focused clinical trials across key aspects of the clinical trial pipeline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7454765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74547652020-08-31 Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials Dahne, Jennifer Tomko, Rachel L McClure, Erin A Obeid, Jihad S Carpenter, Matthew J Nicotine Tob Res Reviews Most tobacco-focused clinical trials are based on locally conducted studies that face significant challenges to implementation and successful execution. These challenges include the need for large, diverse, yet still representative study samples. This often means a protracted, costly, and inefficient recruitment process. Multisite clinical trials can overcome some of these hurdles but incur their own unique challenges. With recent advances in mobile health and digital technologies, there is now a promising alternative: Remote Trials. These trials are led and coordinated by a local investigative team, but are based remotely, within a given community, state, or even nation. The remote approach affords many of the benefits of multisite trials (more efficient recruitment of larger study samples) without the same barriers (cost, multisite management, and regulatory hurdles). The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global health pandemic has resulted in rapid requirements to shift ongoing clinical trials to remote delivery and assessment platforms, making methods for the conduct of remote trials even more timely. The purpose of the present review is to provide an overview of available methods for the conduct of remote tobacco-focused clinical trials as well as illustrative examples of how these methods have been implemented across recently completed and ongoing tobacco studies. We focus on key aspects of the clinical trial pipeline including remote: (1) study recruitment and screening, (2) informed consent, (3) assessment, (4) biomarker collection, and (5) medication adherence monitoring. Implications With recent advances in mobile health and digital technologies, remote trials now offer a promising alternative to traditional in-person clinical trials. Remote trials afford expedient recruitment of large, demographically representative study samples, without undo burden to a research team. The present review provides an overview of available methods for the conduct of remote tobacco-focused clinical trials across key aspects of the clinical trial pipeline. Oxford University Press 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7454765/ /pubmed/32531046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa105 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
spellingShingle Reviews
Dahne, Jennifer
Tomko, Rachel L
McClure, Erin A
Obeid, Jihad S
Carpenter, Matthew J
Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials
title Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials
title_full Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials
title_short Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials
title_sort remote methods for conducting tobacco-focused clinical trials
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa105
work_keys_str_mv AT dahnejennifer remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials
AT tomkorachell remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials
AT mcclureerina remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials
AT obeidjihads remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials
AT carpentermatthewj remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials