Cargando…
Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials
Most tobacco-focused clinical trials are based on locally conducted studies that face significant challenges to implementation and successful execution. These challenges include the need for large, diverse, yet still representative study samples. This often means a protracted, costly, and inefficien...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa105 |
_version_ | 1783575524737548288 |
---|---|
author | Dahne, Jennifer Tomko, Rachel L McClure, Erin A Obeid, Jihad S Carpenter, Matthew J |
author_facet | Dahne, Jennifer Tomko, Rachel L McClure, Erin A Obeid, Jihad S Carpenter, Matthew J |
author_sort | Dahne, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most tobacco-focused clinical trials are based on locally conducted studies that face significant challenges to implementation and successful execution. These challenges include the need for large, diverse, yet still representative study samples. This often means a protracted, costly, and inefficient recruitment process. Multisite clinical trials can overcome some of these hurdles but incur their own unique challenges. With recent advances in mobile health and digital technologies, there is now a promising alternative: Remote Trials. These trials are led and coordinated by a local investigative team, but are based remotely, within a given community, state, or even nation. The remote approach affords many of the benefits of multisite trials (more efficient recruitment of larger study samples) without the same barriers (cost, multisite management, and regulatory hurdles). The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global health pandemic has resulted in rapid requirements to shift ongoing clinical trials to remote delivery and assessment platforms, making methods for the conduct of remote trials even more timely. The purpose of the present review is to provide an overview of available methods for the conduct of remote tobacco-focused clinical trials as well as illustrative examples of how these methods have been implemented across recently completed and ongoing tobacco studies. We focus on key aspects of the clinical trial pipeline including remote: (1) study recruitment and screening, (2) informed consent, (3) assessment, (4) biomarker collection, and (5) medication adherence monitoring. Implications With recent advances in mobile health and digital technologies, remote trials now offer a promising alternative to traditional in-person clinical trials. Remote trials afford expedient recruitment of large, demographically representative study samples, without undo burden to a research team. The present review provides an overview of available methods for the conduct of remote tobacco-focused clinical trials across key aspects of the clinical trial pipeline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7454765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74547652020-08-31 Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials Dahne, Jennifer Tomko, Rachel L McClure, Erin A Obeid, Jihad S Carpenter, Matthew J Nicotine Tob Res Reviews Most tobacco-focused clinical trials are based on locally conducted studies that face significant challenges to implementation and successful execution. These challenges include the need for large, diverse, yet still representative study samples. This often means a protracted, costly, and inefficient recruitment process. Multisite clinical trials can overcome some of these hurdles but incur their own unique challenges. With recent advances in mobile health and digital technologies, there is now a promising alternative: Remote Trials. These trials are led and coordinated by a local investigative team, but are based remotely, within a given community, state, or even nation. The remote approach affords many of the benefits of multisite trials (more efficient recruitment of larger study samples) without the same barriers (cost, multisite management, and regulatory hurdles). The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global health pandemic has resulted in rapid requirements to shift ongoing clinical trials to remote delivery and assessment platforms, making methods for the conduct of remote trials even more timely. The purpose of the present review is to provide an overview of available methods for the conduct of remote tobacco-focused clinical trials as well as illustrative examples of how these methods have been implemented across recently completed and ongoing tobacco studies. We focus on key aspects of the clinical trial pipeline including remote: (1) study recruitment and screening, (2) informed consent, (3) assessment, (4) biomarker collection, and (5) medication adherence monitoring. Implications With recent advances in mobile health and digital technologies, remote trials now offer a promising alternative to traditional in-person clinical trials. Remote trials afford expedient recruitment of large, demographically representative study samples, without undo burden to a research team. The present review provides an overview of available methods for the conduct of remote tobacco-focused clinical trials across key aspects of the clinical trial pipeline. Oxford University Press 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7454765/ /pubmed/32531046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa105 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) |
spellingShingle | Reviews Dahne, Jennifer Tomko, Rachel L McClure, Erin A Obeid, Jihad S Carpenter, Matthew J Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials |
title | Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials |
title_full | Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials |
title_short | Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials |
title_sort | remote methods for conducting tobacco-focused clinical trials |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dahnejennifer remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials AT tomkorachell remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials AT mcclureerina remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials AT obeidjihads remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials AT carpentermatthewj remotemethodsforconductingtobaccofocusedclinicaltrials |