Cargando…
Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol
The mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) represents an interaction between intravascular volume and global cardiovascular compliance (GCC). Intravascular volume expansion using fluid resuscitation is the most frequent intervention in intensive care and emergency medicine for patients in shock and w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238045 |
_version_ | 1783575548958605312 |
---|---|
author | Yastrebov, Konstantin Brunel, Laurencie Williams, Zoe A. Paterson, Hugh S. Yata, Mariko Burrows, Christopher S. Wise, Innes K. Robinson, Benjamin M. Bannon, Paul G. |
author_facet | Yastrebov, Konstantin Brunel, Laurencie Williams, Zoe A. Paterson, Hugh S. Yata, Mariko Burrows, Christopher S. Wise, Innes K. Robinson, Benjamin M. Bannon, Paul G. |
author_sort | Yastrebov, Konstantin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) represents an interaction between intravascular volume and global cardiovascular compliance (GCC). Intravascular volume expansion using fluid resuscitation is the most frequent intervention in intensive care and emergency medicine for patients in shock and with haemodynamic compromise. The relationship between dynamic changes in MSFP, GCC and left ventricular compliance is unknown. We conducted prospective interventional pilot study following euthanasia in post cardiotomy adult sheep, investigating the relationships between changes in MSFP induced by rapid intravascular filling with fluids, global cardiovascular compliance and left ventricular compliance. This pilot investigation suggested a robust correlation between a gradual increase in the intravascular stressed volume from 0 to 40 ml/kg and the MSFP r = 0.708 95% CI 0.435 to 0.862, making feasible future prospective interventional studies. Based on the statistical modelling from the pilot results, we expect to identify a strong correlation of 0.71 ± 0.1 (95% CI) between the MSFP and the stressed intravascular volume in a future study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7454998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74549982020-09-02 Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol Yastrebov, Konstantin Brunel, Laurencie Williams, Zoe A. Paterson, Hugh S. Yata, Mariko Burrows, Christopher S. Wise, Innes K. Robinson, Benjamin M. Bannon, Paul G. PLoS One Research Article The mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) represents an interaction between intravascular volume and global cardiovascular compliance (GCC). Intravascular volume expansion using fluid resuscitation is the most frequent intervention in intensive care and emergency medicine for patients in shock and with haemodynamic compromise. The relationship between dynamic changes in MSFP, GCC and left ventricular compliance is unknown. We conducted prospective interventional pilot study following euthanasia in post cardiotomy adult sheep, investigating the relationships between changes in MSFP induced by rapid intravascular filling with fluids, global cardiovascular compliance and left ventricular compliance. This pilot investigation suggested a robust correlation between a gradual increase in the intravascular stressed volume from 0 to 40 ml/kg and the MSFP r = 0.708 95% CI 0.435 to 0.862, making feasible future prospective interventional studies. Based on the statistical modelling from the pilot results, we expect to identify a strong correlation of 0.71 ± 0.1 (95% CI) between the MSFP and the stressed intravascular volume in a future study. Public Library of Science 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7454998/ /pubmed/32857803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238045 Text en © 2020 Yastrebov et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yastrebov, Konstantin Brunel, Laurencie Williams, Zoe A. Paterson, Hugh S. Yata, Mariko Burrows, Christopher S. Wise, Innes K. Robinson, Benjamin M. Bannon, Paul G. Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol |
title | Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol |
title_full | Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol |
title_fullStr | Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol |
title_short | Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol |
title_sort | comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: pilot investigation and study protocol |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yastrebovkonstantin comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol AT brunellaurencie comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol AT williamszoea comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol AT patersonhughs comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol AT yatamariko comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol AT burrowschristophers comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol AT wiseinnesk comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol AT robinsonbenjaminm comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol AT bannonpaulg comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol |