Cargando…

Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol

The mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) represents an interaction between intravascular volume and global cardiovascular compliance (GCC). Intravascular volume expansion using fluid resuscitation is the most frequent intervention in intensive care and emergency medicine for patients in shock and w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yastrebov, Konstantin, Brunel, Laurencie, Williams, Zoe A., Paterson, Hugh S., Yata, Mariko, Burrows, Christopher S., Wise, Innes K., Robinson, Benjamin M., Bannon, Paul G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238045
_version_ 1783575548958605312
author Yastrebov, Konstantin
Brunel, Laurencie
Williams, Zoe A.
Paterson, Hugh S.
Yata, Mariko
Burrows, Christopher S.
Wise, Innes K.
Robinson, Benjamin M.
Bannon, Paul G.
author_facet Yastrebov, Konstantin
Brunel, Laurencie
Williams, Zoe A.
Paterson, Hugh S.
Yata, Mariko
Burrows, Christopher S.
Wise, Innes K.
Robinson, Benjamin M.
Bannon, Paul G.
author_sort Yastrebov, Konstantin
collection PubMed
description The mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) represents an interaction between intravascular volume and global cardiovascular compliance (GCC). Intravascular volume expansion using fluid resuscitation is the most frequent intervention in intensive care and emergency medicine for patients in shock and with haemodynamic compromise. The relationship between dynamic changes in MSFP, GCC and left ventricular compliance is unknown. We conducted prospective interventional pilot study following euthanasia in post cardiotomy adult sheep, investigating the relationships between changes in MSFP induced by rapid intravascular filling with fluids, global cardiovascular compliance and left ventricular compliance. This pilot investigation suggested a robust correlation between a gradual increase in the intravascular stressed volume from 0 to 40 ml/kg and the MSFP r = 0.708 95% CI 0.435 to 0.862, making feasible future prospective interventional studies. Based on the statistical modelling from the pilot results, we expect to identify a strong correlation of 0.71 ± 0.1 (95% CI) between the MSFP and the stressed intravascular volume in a future study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7454998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74549982020-09-02 Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol Yastrebov, Konstantin Brunel, Laurencie Williams, Zoe A. Paterson, Hugh S. Yata, Mariko Burrows, Christopher S. Wise, Innes K. Robinson, Benjamin M. Bannon, Paul G. PLoS One Research Article The mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) represents an interaction between intravascular volume and global cardiovascular compliance (GCC). Intravascular volume expansion using fluid resuscitation is the most frequent intervention in intensive care and emergency medicine for patients in shock and with haemodynamic compromise. The relationship between dynamic changes in MSFP, GCC and left ventricular compliance is unknown. We conducted prospective interventional pilot study following euthanasia in post cardiotomy adult sheep, investigating the relationships between changes in MSFP induced by rapid intravascular filling with fluids, global cardiovascular compliance and left ventricular compliance. This pilot investigation suggested a robust correlation between a gradual increase in the intravascular stressed volume from 0 to 40 ml/kg and the MSFP r = 0.708 95% CI 0.435 to 0.862, making feasible future prospective interventional studies. Based on the statistical modelling from the pilot results, we expect to identify a strong correlation of 0.71 ± 0.1 (95% CI) between the MSFP and the stressed intravascular volume in a future study. Public Library of Science 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7454998/ /pubmed/32857803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238045 Text en © 2020 Yastrebov et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yastrebov, Konstantin
Brunel, Laurencie
Williams, Zoe A.
Paterson, Hugh S.
Yata, Mariko
Burrows, Christopher S.
Wise, Innes K.
Robinson, Benjamin M.
Bannon, Paul G.
Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol
title Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol
title_full Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol
title_fullStr Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol
title_short Comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: Pilot investigation and study protocol
title_sort comparison of dynamic changes in stressed intravascular volume, mean systemic filling pressure and cardiovascular compliance: pilot investigation and study protocol
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238045
work_keys_str_mv AT yastrebovkonstantin comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol
AT brunellaurencie comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol
AT williamszoea comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol
AT patersonhughs comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol
AT yatamariko comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol
AT burrowschristophers comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol
AT wiseinnesk comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol
AT robinsonbenjaminm comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol
AT bannonpaulg comparisonofdynamicchangesinstressedintravascularvolumemeansystemicfillingpressureandcardiovascularcompliancepilotinvestigationandstudyprotocol