Cargando…

Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, attempts to conserve resources and limit virus spread have resulted in delay of nonemergent procedures across all medical specialties, including cardiac electrophysiology (EP). Many patients have delayed care and continue to express concerns about potential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Workman, Virginia, Freeman, James V., Obasare, Edinrin R., Jain, Shashank, Ganeshan, Raj, Burr, Alicia, Blitzer, Mark, Akar, Joseph, Lampert, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7455246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.08.006
_version_ 1783575592984117248
author Workman, Virginia
Freeman, James V.
Obasare, Edinrin R.
Jain, Shashank
Ganeshan, Raj
Burr, Alicia
Blitzer, Mark
Akar, Joseph
Lampert, Rachel
author_facet Workman, Virginia
Freeman, James V.
Obasare, Edinrin R.
Jain, Shashank
Ganeshan, Raj
Burr, Alicia
Blitzer, Mark
Akar, Joseph
Lampert, Rachel
author_sort Workman, Virginia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, attempts to conserve resources and limit virus spread have resulted in delay of nonemergent procedures across all medical specialties, including cardiac electrophysiology (EP). Many patients have delayed care and continue to express concerns about potential nosocomial spread of coronavirus. OBJECTIVE: To quantify risk of development of COVID-19 owing to in-hospital transmission related to an EP procedure, in the setting of preventive measures instituted in our laboratory areas. METHODS: We contacted patients by telephone who underwent emergent procedures in the electrophysiology lab during the COVID-19 surge at our hospital (March 16, 2020, to May 15, 2020, reaching daily census 450 COVID-19 patients,) ≥2 weeks after the procedure, to assess for symptoms of and/or testing for COVID-19, and assessed outcomes from medical record review. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients undergoing EP procedures in this period, none had developed documented or suspected coronavirus infection. Seven patients described symptoms of chest pain, dyspnea, or fever; 3 were tested for coronavirus and found to be negative. Of the remaining 4, 2 had a more plausible alternative explanation for the symptoms, and 2 had transient symptoms not meeting published criteria for probable COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: Despite a high hospital census of COVID-19 patients during the period of hospital stay for an EP procedure, there were no likely COVID-19 infections occurring in follow-up of at least 2 weeks. With proper use of preventive measures as recommended by published guidelines, the risk of nosocomial spread of COVID-19 to patients in the EP lab is low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7455246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74552462020-08-31 Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures Workman, Virginia Freeman, James V. Obasare, Edinrin R. Jain, Shashank Ganeshan, Raj Burr, Alicia Blitzer, Mark Akar, Joseph Lampert, Rachel Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, attempts to conserve resources and limit virus spread have resulted in delay of nonemergent procedures across all medical specialties, including cardiac electrophysiology (EP). Many patients have delayed care and continue to express concerns about potential nosocomial spread of coronavirus. OBJECTIVE: To quantify risk of development of COVID-19 owing to in-hospital transmission related to an EP procedure, in the setting of preventive measures instituted in our laboratory areas. METHODS: We contacted patients by telephone who underwent emergent procedures in the electrophysiology lab during the COVID-19 surge at our hospital (March 16, 2020, to May 15, 2020, reaching daily census 450 COVID-19 patients,) ≥2 weeks after the procedure, to assess for symptoms of and/or testing for COVID-19, and assessed outcomes from medical record review. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients undergoing EP procedures in this period, none had developed documented or suspected coronavirus infection. Seven patients described symptoms of chest pain, dyspnea, or fever; 3 were tested for coronavirus and found to be negative. Of the remaining 4, 2 had a more plausible alternative explanation for the symptoms, and 2 had transient symptoms not meeting published criteria for probable COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: Despite a high hospital census of COVID-19 patients during the period of hospital stay for an EP procedure, there were no likely COVID-19 infections occurring in follow-up of at least 2 weeks. With proper use of preventive measures as recommended by published guidelines, the risk of nosocomial spread of COVID-19 to patients in the EP lab is low. Elsevier 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7455246/ /pubmed/32904452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.08.006 Text en © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Workman, Virginia
Freeman, James V.
Obasare, Edinrin R.
Jain, Shashank
Ganeshan, Raj
Burr, Alicia
Blitzer, Mark
Akar, Joseph
Lampert, Rachel
Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_full Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_fullStr Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_full_unstemmed Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_short Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_sort risk of covid-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7455246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.08.006
work_keys_str_mv AT workmanvirginia riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT freemanjamesv riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT obasareedinrinr riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT jainshashank riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT ganeshanraj riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT burralicia riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT blitzermark riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT akarjoseph riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT lampertrachel riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures