Cargando…
Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire
BACKGROUND: Robust outcome measures are needed to assess and monitor the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on physical functioning. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a well-established measure designed to capture the impacts of back pain on everyday functioning, with a partic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7455664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5 |
_version_ | 1783575664637509632 |
---|---|
author | Burbridge, Claire Randall, Jason A. Abraham, Lucy Bush, Elizabeth Nicole |
author_facet | Burbridge, Claire Randall, Jason A. Abraham, Lucy Bush, Elizabeth Nicole |
author_sort | Burbridge, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Robust outcome measures are needed to assess and monitor the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on physical functioning. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a well-established measure designed to capture the impacts of back pain on everyday functioning, with a particular emphasis on physical functioning. It has documented evaluation of psychometric properties. However, there is no documented qualitative evidence to confirm the content validity of the tool, nor have changes made for electronic administration been debriefed in participants with CLBP. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured, concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 23 US participants with confirmed CLBP. Interviews allowed participants to describe the impact of CLBP on their day-to-day functioning and discuss comprehension and suitability of the RMDQ. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing revealed the substantial burden associated with CLBP, highlighting 15 key areas of functional impact. These were grouped into overarching themes of mobility (walking, stairs, sitting/standing, bending/kneeling, lifting, lying down), activities (chores/housework, dressing, washing, driving, work) and other (relationships/socializing, mood, sleep, appetite), which are consistent with those evaluated within the RMDQ. All participants found the RMDQ to be relevant with most reporting that the instructions, recall period, and response options were suitable. A few suggested minor changes, however, none were consistent or necessary to support content validity. Updates to the measure for electronic administration and to clarify the response options were well received. CONCLUSION: The qualitative data from individuals with CLBP confirmed that the RMDQ has content validity and, alongside documented psychometric evidence, supports the use of the RMDQ as a reliable and valid tool to assess the impact of CLBP on physical functioning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7455664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74556642020-09-03 Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire Burbridge, Claire Randall, Jason A. Abraham, Lucy Bush, Elizabeth Nicole J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Robust outcome measures are needed to assess and monitor the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on physical functioning. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a well-established measure designed to capture the impacts of back pain on everyday functioning, with a particular emphasis on physical functioning. It has documented evaluation of psychometric properties. However, there is no documented qualitative evidence to confirm the content validity of the tool, nor have changes made for electronic administration been debriefed in participants with CLBP. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured, concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 23 US participants with confirmed CLBP. Interviews allowed participants to describe the impact of CLBP on their day-to-day functioning and discuss comprehension and suitability of the RMDQ. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing revealed the substantial burden associated with CLBP, highlighting 15 key areas of functional impact. These were grouped into overarching themes of mobility (walking, stairs, sitting/standing, bending/kneeling, lifting, lying down), activities (chores/housework, dressing, washing, driving, work) and other (relationships/socializing, mood, sleep, appetite), which are consistent with those evaluated within the RMDQ. All participants found the RMDQ to be relevant with most reporting that the instructions, recall period, and response options were suitable. A few suggested minor changes, however, none were consistent or necessary to support content validity. Updates to the measure for electronic administration and to clarify the response options were well received. CONCLUSION: The qualitative data from individuals with CLBP confirmed that the RMDQ has content validity and, alongside documented psychometric evidence, supports the use of the RMDQ as a reliable and valid tool to assess the impact of CLBP on physical functioning. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7455664/ /pubmed/32857224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Burbridge, Claire Randall, Jason A. Abraham, Lucy Bush, Elizabeth Nicole Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire |
title | Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire |
title_full | Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire |
title_short | Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire |
title_sort | measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the roland morris disability questionnaire |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7455664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burbridgeclaire measuringtheimpactofchroniclowbackpainoneverydayfunctioningcontentvalidityoftherolandmorrisdisabilityquestionnaire AT randalljasona measuringtheimpactofchroniclowbackpainoneverydayfunctioningcontentvalidityoftherolandmorrisdisabilityquestionnaire AT abrahamlucy measuringtheimpactofchroniclowbackpainoneverydayfunctioningcontentvalidityoftherolandmorrisdisabilityquestionnaire AT bushelizabethnicole measuringtheimpactofchroniclowbackpainoneverydayfunctioningcontentvalidityoftherolandmorrisdisabilityquestionnaire |