Cargando…

Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Robust outcome measures are needed to assess and monitor the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on physical functioning. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a well-established measure designed to capture the impacts of back pain on everyday functioning, with a partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burbridge, Claire, Randall, Jason A., Abraham, Lucy, Bush, Elizabeth Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7455664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5
_version_ 1783575664637509632
author Burbridge, Claire
Randall, Jason A.
Abraham, Lucy
Bush, Elizabeth Nicole
author_facet Burbridge, Claire
Randall, Jason A.
Abraham, Lucy
Bush, Elizabeth Nicole
author_sort Burbridge, Claire
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robust outcome measures are needed to assess and monitor the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on physical functioning. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a well-established measure designed to capture the impacts of back pain on everyday functioning, with a particular emphasis on physical functioning. It has documented evaluation of psychometric properties. However, there is no documented qualitative evidence to confirm the content validity of the tool, nor have changes made for electronic administration been debriefed in participants with CLBP. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured, concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 23 US participants with confirmed CLBP. Interviews allowed participants to describe the impact of CLBP on their day-to-day functioning and discuss comprehension and suitability of the RMDQ. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing revealed the substantial burden associated with CLBP, highlighting 15 key areas of functional impact. These were grouped into overarching themes of mobility (walking, stairs, sitting/standing, bending/kneeling, lifting, lying down), activities (chores/housework, dressing, washing, driving, work) and other (relationships/socializing, mood, sleep, appetite), which are consistent with those evaluated within the RMDQ. All participants found the RMDQ to be relevant with most reporting that the instructions, recall period, and response options were suitable. A few suggested minor changes, however, none were consistent or necessary to support content validity. Updates to the measure for electronic administration and to clarify the response options were well received. CONCLUSION: The qualitative data from individuals with CLBP confirmed that the RMDQ has content validity and, alongside documented psychometric evidence, supports the use of the RMDQ as a reliable and valid tool to assess the impact of CLBP on physical functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7455664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74556642020-09-03 Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire Burbridge, Claire Randall, Jason A. Abraham, Lucy Bush, Elizabeth Nicole J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Robust outcome measures are needed to assess and monitor the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on physical functioning. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a well-established measure designed to capture the impacts of back pain on everyday functioning, with a particular emphasis on physical functioning. It has documented evaluation of psychometric properties. However, there is no documented qualitative evidence to confirm the content validity of the tool, nor have changes made for electronic administration been debriefed in participants with CLBP. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured, concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 23 US participants with confirmed CLBP. Interviews allowed participants to describe the impact of CLBP on their day-to-day functioning and discuss comprehension and suitability of the RMDQ. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing revealed the substantial burden associated with CLBP, highlighting 15 key areas of functional impact. These were grouped into overarching themes of mobility (walking, stairs, sitting/standing, bending/kneeling, lifting, lying down), activities (chores/housework, dressing, washing, driving, work) and other (relationships/socializing, mood, sleep, appetite), which are consistent with those evaluated within the RMDQ. All participants found the RMDQ to be relevant with most reporting that the instructions, recall period, and response options were suitable. A few suggested minor changes, however, none were consistent or necessary to support content validity. Updates to the measure for electronic administration and to clarify the response options were well received. CONCLUSION: The qualitative data from individuals with CLBP confirmed that the RMDQ has content validity and, alongside documented psychometric evidence, supports the use of the RMDQ as a reliable and valid tool to assess the impact of CLBP on physical functioning. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7455664/ /pubmed/32857224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Burbridge, Claire
Randall, Jason A.
Abraham, Lucy
Bush, Elizabeth Nicole
Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire
title Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire
title_full Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire
title_fullStr Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire
title_short Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire
title_sort measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the roland morris disability questionnaire
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7455664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5
work_keys_str_mv AT burbridgeclaire measuringtheimpactofchroniclowbackpainoneverydayfunctioningcontentvalidityoftherolandmorrisdisabilityquestionnaire
AT randalljasona measuringtheimpactofchroniclowbackpainoneverydayfunctioningcontentvalidityoftherolandmorrisdisabilityquestionnaire
AT abrahamlucy measuringtheimpactofchroniclowbackpainoneverydayfunctioningcontentvalidityoftherolandmorrisdisabilityquestionnaire
AT bushelizabethnicole measuringtheimpactofchroniclowbackpainoneverydayfunctioningcontentvalidityoftherolandmorrisdisabilityquestionnaire