Cargando…

Efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Clinically, severe burns remain one of the most challenging issues, but an ideal treatment is yet absent. Our purpose is to compare the efficacy of stem cell therapy in a preclinical model of burn wound healing. METHODS: Research reports on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for burn wound he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Hanxiao, Wang, Yang, Yang, Zhen, Xie, Zhiqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32859266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01879-1
_version_ 1783575746014347264
author Yi, Hanxiao
Wang, Yang
Yang, Zhen
Xie, Zhiqin
author_facet Yi, Hanxiao
Wang, Yang
Yang, Zhen
Xie, Zhiqin
author_sort Yi, Hanxiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinically, severe burns remain one of the most challenging issues, but an ideal treatment is yet absent. Our purpose is to compare the efficacy of stem cell therapy in a preclinical model of burn wound healing. METHODS: Research reports on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for burn wound healing were retrieved from 5 databases: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcomes reported in this article include the un-healing rate of the wound area, the closure rate, and the wound area. Secondary outcomes included CD-31, vascular density, interleukin (IL)-10, thickness of eschar tissue, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and white blood cell count. Finally, a subgroup analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity that potentially impacted the primary outcomes. A fixed-effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was performed when no significant heterogeneity existed. Otherwise, a random-effects model was used. All data analysis was conducted by using Engauge Digitizer 10.8 and R software. RESULTS: Twenty eligible articles were finally included in the analysis. Stem cell therapy greatly improved the closure rate (2.00, 95% CI 0.52 to 3.48, p = 0.008) and compromised the wound area (− 2.36; 95% CI − 4.90 to 0.18; p = 0.069) rather than the un-healing rate of the wound area (− 11.10, 95% CI − 32.97 to 10.78, p = 0.320). Though p was 0.069, there was a trend toward shrinkage of the burn wound area after stem cell therapy. Vascular density (4.69; 95% CI 0.06 to 9.31; p = 0.047) and thickness of eschar tissue (6.56, 95% CI 1.15 to 11.98, p = 0.017) were also discovered to be significantly improved in the burn site of stem cell-treated animals. Moreover, we observed that animals in the stem cell group had an increased white blood cell count (0.84, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.66, p = 0.047) 5 days post treatment. Other indicators, such as VEGF (p = 0.381), CD-31 (p = 0.335) and IL-10 (p = 0.567), were not significantly impacted. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited data from preclinical trials, this meta-analysis suggests that stem cell therapy is curative in decreasing the burn wound area and provides some insights into future clinical studies of stem cell therapy for burns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7456061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74560612020-08-31 Efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review Yi, Hanxiao Wang, Yang Yang, Zhen Xie, Zhiqin Stem Cell Res Ther Review BACKGROUND: Clinically, severe burns remain one of the most challenging issues, but an ideal treatment is yet absent. Our purpose is to compare the efficacy of stem cell therapy in a preclinical model of burn wound healing. METHODS: Research reports on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for burn wound healing were retrieved from 5 databases: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcomes reported in this article include the un-healing rate of the wound area, the closure rate, and the wound area. Secondary outcomes included CD-31, vascular density, interleukin (IL)-10, thickness of eschar tissue, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and white blood cell count. Finally, a subgroup analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity that potentially impacted the primary outcomes. A fixed-effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was performed when no significant heterogeneity existed. Otherwise, a random-effects model was used. All data analysis was conducted by using Engauge Digitizer 10.8 and R software. RESULTS: Twenty eligible articles were finally included in the analysis. Stem cell therapy greatly improved the closure rate (2.00, 95% CI 0.52 to 3.48, p = 0.008) and compromised the wound area (− 2.36; 95% CI − 4.90 to 0.18; p = 0.069) rather than the un-healing rate of the wound area (− 11.10, 95% CI − 32.97 to 10.78, p = 0.320). Though p was 0.069, there was a trend toward shrinkage of the burn wound area after stem cell therapy. Vascular density (4.69; 95% CI 0.06 to 9.31; p = 0.047) and thickness of eschar tissue (6.56, 95% CI 1.15 to 11.98, p = 0.017) were also discovered to be significantly improved in the burn site of stem cell-treated animals. Moreover, we observed that animals in the stem cell group had an increased white blood cell count (0.84, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.66, p = 0.047) 5 days post treatment. Other indicators, such as VEGF (p = 0.381), CD-31 (p = 0.335) and IL-10 (p = 0.567), were not significantly impacted. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited data from preclinical trials, this meta-analysis suggests that stem cell therapy is curative in decreasing the burn wound area and provides some insights into future clinical studies of stem cell therapy for burns. BioMed Central 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7456061/ /pubmed/32859266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01879-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Yi, Hanxiao
Wang, Yang
Yang, Zhen
Xie, Zhiqin
Efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review
title Efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review
title_full Efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review
title_short Efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review
title_sort efficacy assessment of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for burn wounds in animals: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32859266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01879-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yihanxiao efficacyassessmentofmesenchymalstemcelltransplantationforburnwoundsinanimalsasystematicreview
AT wangyang efficacyassessmentofmesenchymalstemcelltransplantationforburnwoundsinanimalsasystematicreview
AT yangzhen efficacyassessmentofmesenchymalstemcelltransplantationforburnwoundsinanimalsasystematicreview
AT xiezhiqin efficacyassessmentofmesenchymalstemcelltransplantationforburnwoundsinanimalsasystematicreview