Cargando…

Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data

BACKGROUND: Psychological safety allows healthcare professionals to take the interpersonal risks needed to engage in effective teamwork and to maintain patient safety. In order to improve psychological safety in healthcare teams, an in-depth understanding of the complex and nuanced nature of psychol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Donovan, Róisín, McAuliffe, Eilish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05646-z
_version_ 1783575856919085056
author O’Donovan, Róisín
McAuliffe, Eilish
author_facet O’Donovan, Róisín
McAuliffe, Eilish
author_sort O’Donovan, Róisín
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychological safety allows healthcare professionals to take the interpersonal risks needed to engage in effective teamwork and to maintain patient safety. In order to improve psychological safety in healthcare teams, an in-depth understanding of the complex and nuanced nature of psychological safety is needed. Psychological safety concepts, including voice, silence, learning behaviour, support and familiarity, informed the current study’s investigation of psychological safety. This study aims to use a mixed-methods approach to develop an in-depth understanding of psychological safety within healthcare teams and to build on this understanding to inform the development of future interventions to improve it. METHODS: Survey, observational and interview data are triangulated in order to develop an in- depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams, working within one case study hospital. The teams taking part included one multidisciplinary and three unidisciplinary teams. Observational and survey data were collected during and immediately following team meetings. Individual interviews were conducted with 31 individuals across the four teams. Thematic analysis was used to analyse these interviews. RESULTS: Survey results indicated a high level of psychological safety. However, observations and interviews captured examples of silence and situations where participants felt less psychologically safe. Findings from across all three data sources are discussed in relation to voice and silence, learning, familiarity and support. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide a detailed description and in-depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams. Based on this, recommendations are made for future research and the development of interventions to improve psychological safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7456753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74567532020-08-31 Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data O’Donovan, Róisín McAuliffe, Eilish BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Psychological safety allows healthcare professionals to take the interpersonal risks needed to engage in effective teamwork and to maintain patient safety. In order to improve psychological safety in healthcare teams, an in-depth understanding of the complex and nuanced nature of psychological safety is needed. Psychological safety concepts, including voice, silence, learning behaviour, support and familiarity, informed the current study’s investigation of psychological safety. This study aims to use a mixed-methods approach to develop an in-depth understanding of psychological safety within healthcare teams and to build on this understanding to inform the development of future interventions to improve it. METHODS: Survey, observational and interview data are triangulated in order to develop an in- depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams, working within one case study hospital. The teams taking part included one multidisciplinary and three unidisciplinary teams. Observational and survey data were collected during and immediately following team meetings. Individual interviews were conducted with 31 individuals across the four teams. Thematic analysis was used to analyse these interviews. RESULTS: Survey results indicated a high level of psychological safety. However, observations and interviews captured examples of silence and situations where participants felt less psychologically safe. Findings from across all three data sources are discussed in relation to voice and silence, learning, familiarity and support. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide a detailed description and in-depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams. Based on this, recommendations are made for future research and the development of interventions to improve psychological safety. BioMed Central 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7456753/ /pubmed/32867762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05646-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
O’Donovan, Róisín
McAuliffe, Eilish
Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data
title Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data
title_full Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data
title_fullStr Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data
title_full_unstemmed Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data
title_short Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data
title_sort exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05646-z
work_keys_str_mv AT odonovanroisin exploringpsychologicalsafetyinhealthcareteamstoinformthedevelopmentofinterventionscombiningobservationalsurveyandinterviewdata
AT mcauliffeeilish exploringpsychologicalsafetyinhealthcareteamstoinformthedevelopmentofinterventionscombiningobservationalsurveyandinterviewdata