Cargando…

First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: First point of contact physiotherapy (FPCP) provides patients direct access to a physiotherapist. Literature demonstrates efficacy of FPCP. Evidence has highlighted the need for cultural shifts from both patient and professional perspectives to optimise FPCP. This study explored stakehol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodwin, Rob, Moffatt, Fiona, Hendrick, Paul, Timmons, Stephen, Chadborn, Neil, Logan, Pip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2020.02.003
_version_ 1783575860652015616
author Goodwin, Rob
Moffatt, Fiona
Hendrick, Paul
Timmons, Stephen
Chadborn, Neil
Logan, Pip
author_facet Goodwin, Rob
Moffatt, Fiona
Hendrick, Paul
Timmons, Stephen
Chadborn, Neil
Logan, Pip
author_sort Goodwin, Rob
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: First point of contact physiotherapy (FPCP) provides patients direct access to a physiotherapist. Literature demonstrates efficacy of FPCP. Evidence has highlighted the need for cultural shifts from both patient and professional perspectives to optimise FPCP. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of patient awareness and understanding of FPCP to better inform FPCP implementation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A qualitative methodology utilised semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Findings from a previous realist review were used to generate a priori topic guides. Participants included patients, physiotherapists, GPs, administration staff, and commissioners. A thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Four themes emerged that are described: level of patient awareness of the FPCP role situated against the GP as first contact practitioner, patients attain an awareness of FPCP from a variety of sources, patient understanding of physiotherapy arises from several sources and is poorly aligned with the FPCP model, characteristics and behaviours of patients influence access to FPCP services. Patient awareness and understanding was poor. Patients tended to view the GP as the default first contact practitioner. Traditional advertising approaches appeared on the whole invisible to patients and there was a reliance on signposting to facilitate patient access. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study can inform implementation of FPCP. Several obstacles to the optimisation of FPCP were highlighted. Improved marketing of physiotherapy generally and FPCP specifically may increase patient awareness and understanding. However, it is likely further time will be required to bring about the cultural shift in public perception required to optimise the potential of FPCP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7456768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74567682020-09-03 First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study Goodwin, Rob Moffatt, Fiona Hendrick, Paul Timmons, Stephen Chadborn, Neil Logan, Pip Physiotherapy Article OBJECTIVES: First point of contact physiotherapy (FPCP) provides patients direct access to a physiotherapist. Literature demonstrates efficacy of FPCP. Evidence has highlighted the need for cultural shifts from both patient and professional perspectives to optimise FPCP. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of patient awareness and understanding of FPCP to better inform FPCP implementation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A qualitative methodology utilised semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Findings from a previous realist review were used to generate a priori topic guides. Participants included patients, physiotherapists, GPs, administration staff, and commissioners. A thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Four themes emerged that are described: level of patient awareness of the FPCP role situated against the GP as first contact practitioner, patients attain an awareness of FPCP from a variety of sources, patient understanding of physiotherapy arises from several sources and is poorly aligned with the FPCP model, characteristics and behaviours of patients influence access to FPCP services. Patient awareness and understanding was poor. Patients tended to view the GP as the default first contact practitioner. Traditional advertising approaches appeared on the whole invisible to patients and there was a reliance on signposting to facilitate patient access. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study can inform implementation of FPCP. Several obstacles to the optimisation of FPCP were highlighted. Improved marketing of physiotherapy generally and FPCP specifically may increase patient awareness and understanding. However, it is likely further time will be required to bring about the cultural shift in public perception required to optimise the potential of FPCP. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7456768/ /pubmed/32693240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2020.02.003 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Goodwin, Rob
Moffatt, Fiona
Hendrick, Paul
Timmons, Stephen
Chadborn, Neil
Logan, Pip
First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study
title First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study
title_full First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study
title_fullStr First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study
title_short First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study
title_sort first point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2020.02.003
work_keys_str_mv AT goodwinrob firstpointofcontactphysiotherapyaqualitativestudy
AT moffattfiona firstpointofcontactphysiotherapyaqualitativestudy
AT hendrickpaul firstpointofcontactphysiotherapyaqualitativestudy
AT timmonsstephen firstpointofcontactphysiotherapyaqualitativestudy
AT chadbornneil firstpointofcontactphysiotherapyaqualitativestudy
AT loganpip firstpointofcontactphysiotherapyaqualitativestudy