Cargando…
Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data
BACKGROUND: Previous trials suggest lower long-term risk of mortality after invasive rather than non-invasive management of patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), but the trials excluded very elderly patients. We aimed to estimate the effect of invasive versus non-invasive ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32861307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30930-2 |
_version_ | 1783575863717003264 |
---|---|
author | Kaura, Amit Sterne, Jonathan A C Trickey, Adam Abbott, Sam Mulla, Abdulrahim Glampson, Benjamin Panoulas, Vasileios Davies, Jim Woods, Kerrie Omigie, Joe Shah, Anoop D Channon, Keith M Weber, Jonathan N Thursz, Mark R Elliott, Paul Hemingway, Harry Williams, Bryan Asselbergs, Folkert W O'Sullivan, Michael Lord, Graham M Melikian, Narbeh Johnson, Thomas Francis, Darrel P Shah, Ajay M Perera, Divaka Kharbanda, Rajesh Patel, Riyaz S Mayet, Jamil |
author_facet | Kaura, Amit Sterne, Jonathan A C Trickey, Adam Abbott, Sam Mulla, Abdulrahim Glampson, Benjamin Panoulas, Vasileios Davies, Jim Woods, Kerrie Omigie, Joe Shah, Anoop D Channon, Keith M Weber, Jonathan N Thursz, Mark R Elliott, Paul Hemingway, Harry Williams, Bryan Asselbergs, Folkert W O'Sullivan, Michael Lord, Graham M Melikian, Narbeh Johnson, Thomas Francis, Darrel P Shah, Ajay M Perera, Divaka Kharbanda, Rajesh Patel, Riyaz S Mayet, Jamil |
author_sort | Kaura, Amit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous trials suggest lower long-term risk of mortality after invasive rather than non-invasive management of patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), but the trials excluded very elderly patients. We aimed to estimate the effect of invasive versus non-invasive management within 3 days of peak troponin concentration on the survival of patients aged 80 years or older with NSTEMI. METHODS: Routine clinical data for this study were obtained from five collaborating hospitals hosting NIHR Biomedical Research Centres in the UK (all tertiary centres with emergency departments). Eligible patients were 80 years old or older when they underwent troponin measurements and were diagnosed with NSTEMI between 2010 (2008 for University College Hospital) and 2017. Propensity scores (patients' estimated probability of receiving invasive management) based on pretreatment variables were derived using logistic regression; patients with high probabilities of non-invasive or invasive management were excluded. Patients who died within 3 days of peak troponin concentration without receiving invasive management were assigned to the invasive or non-invasive management groups based on their propensity scores, to mitigate immortal time bias. We estimated mortality hazard ratios comparing invasive with non-invasive management, and compared the rate of hospital admissions for heart failure. FINDINGS: Of the 1976 patients with NSTEMI, 101 died within 3 days of their peak troponin concentration and 375 were excluded because of extreme propensity scores. The remaining 1500 patients had a median age of 86 (IQR 82–89) years of whom (845 [56%] received non-invasive management. During median follow-up of 3·0 (IQR 1·2–4·8) years, 613 (41%) patients died. The adjusted cumulative 5-year mortality was 36% in the invasive management group and 55% in the non-invasive management group (adjusted hazard ratio 0·68, 95% CI 0·55–0·84). Invasive management was associated with lower incidence of hospital admissions for heart failure (adjusted rate ratio compared with non-invasive management 0·67, 95% CI 0·48–0·93). INTERPRETATION: The survival advantage of invasive compared with non-invasive management appears to extend to patients with NSTEMI who are aged 80 years or older. FUNDING: NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, as part of the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7456783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74567832020-09-03 Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data Kaura, Amit Sterne, Jonathan A C Trickey, Adam Abbott, Sam Mulla, Abdulrahim Glampson, Benjamin Panoulas, Vasileios Davies, Jim Woods, Kerrie Omigie, Joe Shah, Anoop D Channon, Keith M Weber, Jonathan N Thursz, Mark R Elliott, Paul Hemingway, Harry Williams, Bryan Asselbergs, Folkert W O'Sullivan, Michael Lord, Graham M Melikian, Narbeh Johnson, Thomas Francis, Darrel P Shah, Ajay M Perera, Divaka Kharbanda, Rajesh Patel, Riyaz S Mayet, Jamil Lancet Article BACKGROUND: Previous trials suggest lower long-term risk of mortality after invasive rather than non-invasive management of patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), but the trials excluded very elderly patients. We aimed to estimate the effect of invasive versus non-invasive management within 3 days of peak troponin concentration on the survival of patients aged 80 years or older with NSTEMI. METHODS: Routine clinical data for this study were obtained from five collaborating hospitals hosting NIHR Biomedical Research Centres in the UK (all tertiary centres with emergency departments). Eligible patients were 80 years old or older when they underwent troponin measurements and were diagnosed with NSTEMI between 2010 (2008 for University College Hospital) and 2017. Propensity scores (patients' estimated probability of receiving invasive management) based on pretreatment variables were derived using logistic regression; patients with high probabilities of non-invasive or invasive management were excluded. Patients who died within 3 days of peak troponin concentration without receiving invasive management were assigned to the invasive or non-invasive management groups based on their propensity scores, to mitigate immortal time bias. We estimated mortality hazard ratios comparing invasive with non-invasive management, and compared the rate of hospital admissions for heart failure. FINDINGS: Of the 1976 patients with NSTEMI, 101 died within 3 days of their peak troponin concentration and 375 were excluded because of extreme propensity scores. The remaining 1500 patients had a median age of 86 (IQR 82–89) years of whom (845 [56%] received non-invasive management. During median follow-up of 3·0 (IQR 1·2–4·8) years, 613 (41%) patients died. The adjusted cumulative 5-year mortality was 36% in the invasive management group and 55% in the non-invasive management group (adjusted hazard ratio 0·68, 95% CI 0·55–0·84). Invasive management was associated with lower incidence of hospital admissions for heart failure (adjusted rate ratio compared with non-invasive management 0·67, 95% CI 0·48–0·93). INTERPRETATION: The survival advantage of invasive compared with non-invasive management appears to extend to patients with NSTEMI who are aged 80 years or older. FUNDING: NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, as part of the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative. Elsevier 2020-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7456783/ /pubmed/32861307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30930-2 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kaura, Amit Sterne, Jonathan A C Trickey, Adam Abbott, Sam Mulla, Abdulrahim Glampson, Benjamin Panoulas, Vasileios Davies, Jim Woods, Kerrie Omigie, Joe Shah, Anoop D Channon, Keith M Weber, Jonathan N Thursz, Mark R Elliott, Paul Hemingway, Harry Williams, Bryan Asselbergs, Folkert W O'Sullivan, Michael Lord, Graham M Melikian, Narbeh Johnson, Thomas Francis, Darrel P Shah, Ajay M Perera, Divaka Kharbanda, Rajesh Patel, Riyaz S Mayet, Jamil Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data |
title | Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data |
title_full | Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data |
title_fullStr | Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data |
title_full_unstemmed | Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data |
title_short | Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data |
title_sort | invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-st elevation myocardial infarction (senior-nstemi): a cohort study based on routine clinical data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32861307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30930-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kauraamit invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT sternejonathanac invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT trickeyadam invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT abbottsam invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT mullaabdulrahim invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT glampsonbenjamin invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT panoulasvasileios invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT daviesjim invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT woodskerrie invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT omigiejoe invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT shahanoopd invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT channonkeithm invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT weberjonathann invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT thurszmarkr invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT elliottpaul invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT hemingwayharry invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT williamsbryan invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT asselbergsfolkertw invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT osullivanmichael invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT lordgrahamm invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT melikiannarbeh invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT johnsonthomas invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT francisdarrelp invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT shahajaym invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT pereradivaka invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT kharbandarajesh invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT patelriyazs invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata AT mayetjamil invasiveversusnoninvasivemanagementofolderpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionseniornstemiacohortstudybasedonroutineclinicaldata |