Cargando…
Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Daily image guidance is standard care for prostate radiotherapy. Innovations which improve the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasound guidance are needed, particularly with respect to reducing interobserver variation. This study explores automation tools for this purpose, demo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Scientific Publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32387546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.044 |
_version_ | 1783575865349636096 |
---|---|
author | Grimwood, Alexander Rivaz, Hassan Zhou, Hang McNair, Helen A. Jakubowski, Klaudiusz Bamber, Jeffrey C. Tree, Alison C. Harris, Emma J. |
author_facet | Grimwood, Alexander Rivaz, Hassan Zhou, Hang McNair, Helen A. Jakubowski, Klaudiusz Bamber, Jeffrey C. Tree, Alison C. Harris, Emma J. |
author_sort | Grimwood, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Daily image guidance is standard care for prostate radiotherapy. Innovations which improve the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasound guidance are needed, particularly with respect to reducing interobserver variation. This study explores automation tools for this purpose, demonstrated on the Elekta Clarity Autoscan®. The study was conducted as part of the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasound scan volumes were collected from 32 patients. Prostate matches were performed using two proposed workflows and the results compared with Clarity’s proprietary software. Gold standard matches derived from manually localised landmarks provided a reference. The two workflows incorporated a custom 3D image registration algorithm, which was benchmarked against a third-party application (Elastix). RESULTS: Significant reductions in match errors were reported from both workflows compared to standard protocol. Median (IQR) absolute errors in the left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes were lowest for the Manually Initiated workflow: 0.7(1.0) mm, 0.7(0.9) mm, 0.6(0.9) mm compared to 1.0(1.7) mm, 0.9(1.4) mm, 0.9(1.2) mm for Clarity. Median interobserver variation was ≪0.01 mm in all axes for both workflows compared to 2.2 mm, 1.7 mm, 1.5 mm for Clarity in left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes. Mean matching times was also reduced to 43 s from 152 s for Clarity. Inexperienced users of the proposed workflows attained better match precision than experienced users on Clarity. CONCLUSION: Automated image registration with effective input and verification steps should increase the efficacy of interfraction ultrasound guidance compared to the current commercially available tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7456791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier Scientific Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74567912020-09-03 Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching Grimwood, Alexander Rivaz, Hassan Zhou, Hang McNair, Helen A. Jakubowski, Klaudiusz Bamber, Jeffrey C. Tree, Alison C. Harris, Emma J. Radiother Oncol Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Daily image guidance is standard care for prostate radiotherapy. Innovations which improve the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasound guidance are needed, particularly with respect to reducing interobserver variation. This study explores automation tools for this purpose, demonstrated on the Elekta Clarity Autoscan®. The study was conducted as part of the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasound scan volumes were collected from 32 patients. Prostate matches were performed using two proposed workflows and the results compared with Clarity’s proprietary software. Gold standard matches derived from manually localised landmarks provided a reference. The two workflows incorporated a custom 3D image registration algorithm, which was benchmarked against a third-party application (Elastix). RESULTS: Significant reductions in match errors were reported from both workflows compared to standard protocol. Median (IQR) absolute errors in the left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes were lowest for the Manually Initiated workflow: 0.7(1.0) mm, 0.7(0.9) mm, 0.6(0.9) mm compared to 1.0(1.7) mm, 0.9(1.4) mm, 0.9(1.2) mm for Clarity. Median interobserver variation was ≪0.01 mm in all axes for both workflows compared to 2.2 mm, 1.7 mm, 1.5 mm for Clarity in left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes. Mean matching times was also reduced to 43 s from 152 s for Clarity. Inexperienced users of the proposed workflows attained better match precision than experienced users on Clarity. CONCLUSION: Automated image registration with effective input and verification steps should increase the efficacy of interfraction ultrasound guidance compared to the current commercially available tools. Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7456791/ /pubmed/32387546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.044 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Grimwood, Alexander Rivaz, Hassan Zhou, Hang McNair, Helen A. Jakubowski, Klaudiusz Bamber, Jeffrey C. Tree, Alison C. Harris, Emma J. Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching |
title | Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching |
title_full | Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching |
title_fullStr | Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching |
title_short | Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching |
title_sort | improving 3d ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32387546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grimwoodalexander improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching AT rivazhassan improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching AT zhouhang improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching AT mcnairhelena improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching AT jakubowskiklaudiusz improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching AT bamberjeffreyc improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching AT treealisonc improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching AT harrisemmaj improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching |