Cargando…

Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Daily image guidance is standard care for prostate radiotherapy. Innovations which improve the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasound guidance are needed, particularly with respect to reducing interobserver variation. This study explores automation tools for this purpose, demo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grimwood, Alexander, Rivaz, Hassan, Zhou, Hang, McNair, Helen A., Jakubowski, Klaudiusz, Bamber, Jeffrey C., Tree, Alison C., Harris, Emma J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32387546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.044
_version_ 1783575865349636096
author Grimwood, Alexander
Rivaz, Hassan
Zhou, Hang
McNair, Helen A.
Jakubowski, Klaudiusz
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
Tree, Alison C.
Harris, Emma J.
author_facet Grimwood, Alexander
Rivaz, Hassan
Zhou, Hang
McNair, Helen A.
Jakubowski, Klaudiusz
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
Tree, Alison C.
Harris, Emma J.
author_sort Grimwood, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Daily image guidance is standard care for prostate radiotherapy. Innovations which improve the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasound guidance are needed, particularly with respect to reducing interobserver variation. This study explores automation tools for this purpose, demonstrated on the Elekta Clarity Autoscan®. The study was conducted as part of the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasound scan volumes were collected from 32 patients. Prostate matches were performed using two proposed workflows and the results compared with Clarity’s proprietary software. Gold standard matches derived from manually localised landmarks provided a reference. The two workflows incorporated a custom 3D image registration algorithm, which was benchmarked against a third-party application (Elastix). RESULTS: Significant reductions in match errors were reported from both workflows compared to standard protocol. Median (IQR) absolute errors in the left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes were lowest for the Manually Initiated workflow: 0.7(1.0) mm, 0.7(0.9) mm, 0.6(0.9) mm compared to 1.0(1.7) mm, 0.9(1.4) mm, 0.9(1.2) mm for Clarity. Median interobserver variation was ≪0.01 mm in all axes for both workflows compared to 2.2 mm, 1.7 mm, 1.5 mm for Clarity in left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes. Mean matching times was also reduced to 43 s from 152 s for Clarity. Inexperienced users of the proposed workflows attained better match precision than experienced users on Clarity. CONCLUSION: Automated image registration with effective input and verification steps should increase the efficacy of interfraction ultrasound guidance compared to the current commercially available tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7456791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Scientific Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74567912020-09-03 Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching Grimwood, Alexander Rivaz, Hassan Zhou, Hang McNair, Helen A. Jakubowski, Klaudiusz Bamber, Jeffrey C. Tree, Alison C. Harris, Emma J. Radiother Oncol Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Daily image guidance is standard care for prostate radiotherapy. Innovations which improve the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasound guidance are needed, particularly with respect to reducing interobserver variation. This study explores automation tools for this purpose, demonstrated on the Elekta Clarity Autoscan®. The study was conducted as part of the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasound scan volumes were collected from 32 patients. Prostate matches were performed using two proposed workflows and the results compared with Clarity’s proprietary software. Gold standard matches derived from manually localised landmarks provided a reference. The two workflows incorporated a custom 3D image registration algorithm, which was benchmarked against a third-party application (Elastix). RESULTS: Significant reductions in match errors were reported from both workflows compared to standard protocol. Median (IQR) absolute errors in the left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes were lowest for the Manually Initiated workflow: 0.7(1.0) mm, 0.7(0.9) mm, 0.6(0.9) mm compared to 1.0(1.7) mm, 0.9(1.4) mm, 0.9(1.2) mm for Clarity. Median interobserver variation was ≪0.01 mm in all axes for both workflows compared to 2.2 mm, 1.7 mm, 1.5 mm for Clarity in left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes. Mean matching times was also reduced to 43 s from 152 s for Clarity. Inexperienced users of the proposed workflows attained better match precision than experienced users on Clarity. CONCLUSION: Automated image registration with effective input and verification steps should increase the efficacy of interfraction ultrasound guidance compared to the current commercially available tools. Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7456791/ /pubmed/32387546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.044 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grimwood, Alexander
Rivaz, Hassan
Zhou, Hang
McNair, Helen A.
Jakubowski, Klaudiusz
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
Tree, Alison C.
Harris, Emma J.
Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching
title Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching
title_full Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching
title_fullStr Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching
title_full_unstemmed Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching
title_short Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching
title_sort improving 3d ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32387546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.044
work_keys_str_mv AT grimwoodalexander improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching
AT rivazhassan improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching
AT zhouhang improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching
AT mcnairhelena improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching
AT jakubowskiklaudiusz improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching
AT bamberjeffreyc improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching
AT treealisonc improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching
AT harrisemmaj improving3dultrasoundprostatelocalisationinradiotherapythroughincreasedautomationofinterfractionmatching