Cargando…

Comparing the Cell Dynamics of Tree-Ring Formation Observed in Microcores and as Predicted by the Vaganov–Shashkin Model

New insights into the intra-annual dynamics of tree-ring formation can improve our understanding of tree-growth response to environmental conditions at high-resolution time scales. Obtaining this information requires, however, a weekly monitoring of wood formation, sampling that is extremely time-in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buttò, Valentina, Shishov, Vladimir, Tychkov, Ivan, Popkova, Margarita, He, Minhui, Rossi, Sergio, Deslauriers, Annie, Morin, Hubert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01268
_version_ 1783575914202791936
author Buttò, Valentina
Shishov, Vladimir
Tychkov, Ivan
Popkova, Margarita
He, Minhui
Rossi, Sergio
Deslauriers, Annie
Morin, Hubert
author_facet Buttò, Valentina
Shishov, Vladimir
Tychkov, Ivan
Popkova, Margarita
He, Minhui
Rossi, Sergio
Deslauriers, Annie
Morin, Hubert
author_sort Buttò, Valentina
collection PubMed
description New insights into the intra-annual dynamics of tree-ring formation can improve our understanding of tree-growth response to environmental conditions at high-resolution time scales. Obtaining this information requires, however, a weekly monitoring of wood formation, sampling that is extremely time-intensive and scarcely feasible over vast areas. Estimating the timing of cambial and xylem differentiation by modeling thus represents an interesting alternative for obtaining this important information by other means. Temporal dynamics of cambial divisions can be extracted from the daily tree-ring growth rate computed by the Vaganov–Shashkin (VS) simulation model, assuming that cell production is tightly linked to tree-ring growth. Nonetheless, these predictions have yet to be compared with direct observations of wood development, i.e., via microcoring, over a long time span. We tested the performance of the VS model by comparing the observed and predicted timing of wood formation in black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.)]. We obtained microcores over 15 years at 5 sites along a latitudinal gradient in Quebec (Canada). The measured variables included cell size and the timing of cell production and differentiation. We calibrated the VS model using daily temperature and precipitation recorded by weather stations located on each site. The predicted and observed timing of cambial and enlarging cells were highly correlated (R (2) = 0.8); nonetheless, we detected a systematic overestimation in the predicted timing of cambial cells, with predictions delayed by 1–20 days compared with observations. The growth rate of cell diameter was correlated with the predicted growth rate assigned to each cambial cell, confirming that cell diameter developmental dynamics have the potential to be inferred by the tree-ring growth curve of the VS model. Model performances decrease substantially in estimating the end of wood formation. The systematic errors suggest that the actual relationships implemented in the model are unable to explain the phenological events in autumn. The mismatch between the observed and predicted timing of wood formation in black spruce within our study area can be reduced by better adapting the VS model to wet sites, a context for which this model has been rarely used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7457011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74570112020-09-11 Comparing the Cell Dynamics of Tree-Ring Formation Observed in Microcores and as Predicted by the Vaganov–Shashkin Model Buttò, Valentina Shishov, Vladimir Tychkov, Ivan Popkova, Margarita He, Minhui Rossi, Sergio Deslauriers, Annie Morin, Hubert Front Plant Sci Plant Science New insights into the intra-annual dynamics of tree-ring formation can improve our understanding of tree-growth response to environmental conditions at high-resolution time scales. Obtaining this information requires, however, a weekly monitoring of wood formation, sampling that is extremely time-intensive and scarcely feasible over vast areas. Estimating the timing of cambial and xylem differentiation by modeling thus represents an interesting alternative for obtaining this important information by other means. Temporal dynamics of cambial divisions can be extracted from the daily tree-ring growth rate computed by the Vaganov–Shashkin (VS) simulation model, assuming that cell production is tightly linked to tree-ring growth. Nonetheless, these predictions have yet to be compared with direct observations of wood development, i.e., via microcoring, over a long time span. We tested the performance of the VS model by comparing the observed and predicted timing of wood formation in black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.)]. We obtained microcores over 15 years at 5 sites along a latitudinal gradient in Quebec (Canada). The measured variables included cell size and the timing of cell production and differentiation. We calibrated the VS model using daily temperature and precipitation recorded by weather stations located on each site. The predicted and observed timing of cambial and enlarging cells were highly correlated (R (2) = 0.8); nonetheless, we detected a systematic overestimation in the predicted timing of cambial cells, with predictions delayed by 1–20 days compared with observations. The growth rate of cell diameter was correlated with the predicted growth rate assigned to each cambial cell, confirming that cell diameter developmental dynamics have the potential to be inferred by the tree-ring growth curve of the VS model. Model performances decrease substantially in estimating the end of wood formation. The systematic errors suggest that the actual relationships implemented in the model are unable to explain the phenological events in autumn. The mismatch between the observed and predicted timing of wood formation in black spruce within our study area can be reduced by better adapting the VS model to wet sites, a context for which this model has been rarely used. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7457011/ /pubmed/32922430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01268 Text en Copyright © 2020 Buttò, Shishov, Tychkov, Popkova, He, Rossi, Deslauriers and Morin http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Buttò, Valentina
Shishov, Vladimir
Tychkov, Ivan
Popkova, Margarita
He, Minhui
Rossi, Sergio
Deslauriers, Annie
Morin, Hubert
Comparing the Cell Dynamics of Tree-Ring Formation Observed in Microcores and as Predicted by the Vaganov–Shashkin Model
title Comparing the Cell Dynamics of Tree-Ring Formation Observed in Microcores and as Predicted by the Vaganov–Shashkin Model
title_full Comparing the Cell Dynamics of Tree-Ring Formation Observed in Microcores and as Predicted by the Vaganov–Shashkin Model
title_fullStr Comparing the Cell Dynamics of Tree-Ring Formation Observed in Microcores and as Predicted by the Vaganov–Shashkin Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Cell Dynamics of Tree-Ring Formation Observed in Microcores and as Predicted by the Vaganov–Shashkin Model
title_short Comparing the Cell Dynamics of Tree-Ring Formation Observed in Microcores and as Predicted by the Vaganov–Shashkin Model
title_sort comparing the cell dynamics of tree-ring formation observed in microcores and as predicted by the vaganov–shashkin model
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01268
work_keys_str_mv AT buttovalentina comparingthecelldynamicsoftreeringformationobservedinmicrocoresandaspredictedbythevaganovshashkinmodel
AT shishovvladimir comparingthecelldynamicsoftreeringformationobservedinmicrocoresandaspredictedbythevaganovshashkinmodel
AT tychkovivan comparingthecelldynamicsoftreeringformationobservedinmicrocoresandaspredictedbythevaganovshashkinmodel
AT popkovamargarita comparingthecelldynamicsoftreeringformationobservedinmicrocoresandaspredictedbythevaganovshashkinmodel
AT heminhui comparingthecelldynamicsoftreeringformationobservedinmicrocoresandaspredictedbythevaganovshashkinmodel
AT rossisergio comparingthecelldynamicsoftreeringformationobservedinmicrocoresandaspredictedbythevaganovshashkinmodel
AT deslauriersannie comparingthecelldynamicsoftreeringformationobservedinmicrocoresandaspredictedbythevaganovshashkinmodel
AT morinhubert comparingthecelldynamicsoftreeringformationobservedinmicrocoresandaspredictedbythevaganovshashkinmodel