Cargando…

Relationships Between Rearing Enrichments, Range Use, and an Environmental Stressor for Free-Range Laying Hen Welfare

Enrichments during pullet rearing may improve adaptation and welfare of hens as they move from indoor rearing to a free-range system. Individual variation in outdoor ranging may also affect welfare. This study assessed the effects of rearing enrichments and an imposed environmental stressor on hen w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bari, Md Saiful, Downing, Jeff A., Dyall, Tim R., Lee, Caroline, Campbell, Dana L. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00480
_version_ 1783575932646195200
author Bari, Md Saiful
Downing, Jeff A.
Dyall, Tim R.
Lee, Caroline
Campbell, Dana L. M.
author_facet Bari, Md Saiful
Downing, Jeff A.
Dyall, Tim R.
Lee, Caroline
Campbell, Dana L. M.
author_sort Bari, Md Saiful
collection PubMed
description Enrichments during pullet rearing may improve adaptation and welfare of hens as they move from indoor rearing to a free-range system. Individual variation in outdoor ranging may also affect welfare. This study assessed the effects of rearing enrichments and an imposed environmental stressor on hen welfare and egg quality along with the association of welfare with ranging. Hy-Line Brown® chicks (n = 1,386) were reared indoors until 16 weeks with 3 enrichment treatments including a “control” group with standard floor litter, a “novelty” group that received novel objects that were changed weekly, and a “structural” group with H-shaped perching structures. Pullets were then moved to a free-range system with three replicates of each rearing treatment. Daily ranging was individually tracked from 25 to 64 weeks via radiofrequency identification technology. Individual hen welfare assessments were performed at 25, 33, 43, 56, and 64 weeks and correlated with ranging time prior to these dates. At 44 weeks, the range area was reduced by 80% for 11 days to induce stress. Changes in ranging behavior, albumen corticosterone concentrations and egg quality were evaluated. GLMMs showed significant interactions between hen age and rearing treatment for live weight, number of comb wounds, plumage coverage, and toenail length (all P ≤ 0.003), with the enriched hens showing more consistent live weight at the later ages, fewer comb wounds at 33 weeks, and better plumage coverage at the later ages, whereas the structural hens had shorter toenails as age increased. Plumage coverage showed a positive relationship with range use across most age points (P < 0.0001). Hens reduced ranging time following the imposed stressor but increased their number of visits with the lowest increase by the structural hens (P = 0.03). Significant interactions between rearing treatment and stressor for albumen corticosterone concentrations showed the structural hens decreased concentrations immediately post-stress, but the control and novelty groups increased (P < 0.006). The stressor increased or decreased values of most egg quality parameters across all rearing groups (all P ≤ 0.02). Overall, provision of rearing enrichments and greater range use may have positive impacts on hen welfare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7457091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74570912020-09-11 Relationships Between Rearing Enrichments, Range Use, and an Environmental Stressor for Free-Range Laying Hen Welfare Bari, Md Saiful Downing, Jeff A. Dyall, Tim R. Lee, Caroline Campbell, Dana L. M. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Enrichments during pullet rearing may improve adaptation and welfare of hens as they move from indoor rearing to a free-range system. Individual variation in outdoor ranging may also affect welfare. This study assessed the effects of rearing enrichments and an imposed environmental stressor on hen welfare and egg quality along with the association of welfare with ranging. Hy-Line Brown® chicks (n = 1,386) were reared indoors until 16 weeks with 3 enrichment treatments including a “control” group with standard floor litter, a “novelty” group that received novel objects that were changed weekly, and a “structural” group with H-shaped perching structures. Pullets were then moved to a free-range system with three replicates of each rearing treatment. Daily ranging was individually tracked from 25 to 64 weeks via radiofrequency identification technology. Individual hen welfare assessments were performed at 25, 33, 43, 56, and 64 weeks and correlated with ranging time prior to these dates. At 44 weeks, the range area was reduced by 80% for 11 days to induce stress. Changes in ranging behavior, albumen corticosterone concentrations and egg quality were evaluated. GLMMs showed significant interactions between hen age and rearing treatment for live weight, number of comb wounds, plumage coverage, and toenail length (all P ≤ 0.003), with the enriched hens showing more consistent live weight at the later ages, fewer comb wounds at 33 weeks, and better plumage coverage at the later ages, whereas the structural hens had shorter toenails as age increased. Plumage coverage showed a positive relationship with range use across most age points (P < 0.0001). Hens reduced ranging time following the imposed stressor but increased their number of visits with the lowest increase by the structural hens (P = 0.03). Significant interactions between rearing treatment and stressor for albumen corticosterone concentrations showed the structural hens decreased concentrations immediately post-stress, but the control and novelty groups increased (P < 0.006). The stressor increased or decreased values of most egg quality parameters across all rearing groups (all P ≤ 0.02). Overall, provision of rearing enrichments and greater range use may have positive impacts on hen welfare. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7457091/ /pubmed/32923465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00480 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bari, Downing, Dyall, Lee and Campbell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Bari, Md Saiful
Downing, Jeff A.
Dyall, Tim R.
Lee, Caroline
Campbell, Dana L. M.
Relationships Between Rearing Enrichments, Range Use, and an Environmental Stressor for Free-Range Laying Hen Welfare
title Relationships Between Rearing Enrichments, Range Use, and an Environmental Stressor for Free-Range Laying Hen Welfare
title_full Relationships Between Rearing Enrichments, Range Use, and an Environmental Stressor for Free-Range Laying Hen Welfare
title_fullStr Relationships Between Rearing Enrichments, Range Use, and an Environmental Stressor for Free-Range Laying Hen Welfare
title_full_unstemmed Relationships Between Rearing Enrichments, Range Use, and an Environmental Stressor for Free-Range Laying Hen Welfare
title_short Relationships Between Rearing Enrichments, Range Use, and an Environmental Stressor for Free-Range Laying Hen Welfare
title_sort relationships between rearing enrichments, range use, and an environmental stressor for free-range laying hen welfare
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00480
work_keys_str_mv AT barimdsaiful relationshipsbetweenrearingenrichmentsrangeuseandanenvironmentalstressorforfreerangelayinghenwelfare
AT downingjeffa relationshipsbetweenrearingenrichmentsrangeuseandanenvironmentalstressorforfreerangelayinghenwelfare
AT dyalltimr relationshipsbetweenrearingenrichmentsrangeuseandanenvironmentalstressorforfreerangelayinghenwelfare
AT leecaroline relationshipsbetweenrearingenrichmentsrangeuseandanenvironmentalstressorforfreerangelayinghenwelfare
AT campbelldanalm relationshipsbetweenrearingenrichmentsrangeuseandanenvironmentalstressorforfreerangelayinghenwelfare