Cargando…
Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the current state of oncology education in Canadian family medicine postgraduate medical education programs (FM PGME) and examine opinions regarding optimal oncology education in these programs. METHODS: A survey was designed to evaluate ideal and current on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32854702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02207-0 |
_version_ | 1783575960904269824 |
---|---|
author | Yip, Steven M. Meyers, Daniel E. Sisler, Jeff Wycliffe-Jones, Keith Kucharski, Edward Elser, Christine Temple-Oberle, Claire Spadafora, Silvana Ingledew, Paris-Ann Giuliani, Meredith Kuruvilla, Sara Sumar, Nureen Tam, Vincent C. |
author_facet | Yip, Steven M. Meyers, Daniel E. Sisler, Jeff Wycliffe-Jones, Keith Kucharski, Edward Elser, Christine Temple-Oberle, Claire Spadafora, Silvana Ingledew, Paris-Ann Giuliani, Meredith Kuruvilla, Sara Sumar, Nureen Tam, Vincent C. |
author_sort | Yip, Steven M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the current state of oncology education in Canadian family medicine postgraduate medical education programs (FM PGME) and examine opinions regarding optimal oncology education in these programs. METHODS: A survey was designed to evaluate ideal and current oncology teaching, educational topics, objectives, and competencies in FM PGMEs. The survey was sent to Canadian family medicine (FM) residents and program directors (PDs). RESULTS: In total, 150 residents and 17 PDs affiliated with 16 of 17 Canadian medical schools completed the survey. The majority indicated their programs do not have a mandatory clinical rotation in oncology (79% residents, 88% PDs). Low rates of residents (7%) and PDs (13%) reported FM residents being adequately prepared for their role in caring for cancer patients (p = 0.03). Residents and PDs believed the most optimal method of teaching oncology is through clinical exposure (65% residents, 80% PDs). Residents and PDs agreed the most important topics to learn (rated ≥4.7 on 5-point Likert scale) were: performing pap smears, cancer screening/prevention, breaking bad news, and approach to patient with increased cancer risk. According to residents, other important topics such as appropriate cancer patient referrals, managing cancer complications and post-treatment surveillance were only taught at frequencies of 52, 40 and 36%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current FM PGME oncology education is suboptimal, although the degree differs in the opinion of residents and PDs. This study identified topics and methods of education which could be focussed upon to improve FM oncology education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7457241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74572412020-08-31 Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey Yip, Steven M. Meyers, Daniel E. Sisler, Jeff Wycliffe-Jones, Keith Kucharski, Edward Elser, Christine Temple-Oberle, Claire Spadafora, Silvana Ingledew, Paris-Ann Giuliani, Meredith Kuruvilla, Sara Sumar, Nureen Tam, Vincent C. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the current state of oncology education in Canadian family medicine postgraduate medical education programs (FM PGME) and examine opinions regarding optimal oncology education in these programs. METHODS: A survey was designed to evaluate ideal and current oncology teaching, educational topics, objectives, and competencies in FM PGMEs. The survey was sent to Canadian family medicine (FM) residents and program directors (PDs). RESULTS: In total, 150 residents and 17 PDs affiliated with 16 of 17 Canadian medical schools completed the survey. The majority indicated their programs do not have a mandatory clinical rotation in oncology (79% residents, 88% PDs). Low rates of residents (7%) and PDs (13%) reported FM residents being adequately prepared for their role in caring for cancer patients (p = 0.03). Residents and PDs believed the most optimal method of teaching oncology is through clinical exposure (65% residents, 80% PDs). Residents and PDs agreed the most important topics to learn (rated ≥4.7 on 5-point Likert scale) were: performing pap smears, cancer screening/prevention, breaking bad news, and approach to patient with increased cancer risk. According to residents, other important topics such as appropriate cancer patient referrals, managing cancer complications and post-treatment surveillance were only taught at frequencies of 52, 40 and 36%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current FM PGME oncology education is suboptimal, although the degree differs in the opinion of residents and PDs. This study identified topics and methods of education which could be focussed upon to improve FM oncology education. BioMed Central 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7457241/ /pubmed/32854702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02207-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yip, Steven M. Meyers, Daniel E. Sisler, Jeff Wycliffe-Jones, Keith Kucharski, Edward Elser, Christine Temple-Oberle, Claire Spadafora, Silvana Ingledew, Paris-Ann Giuliani, Meredith Kuruvilla, Sara Sumar, Nureen Tam, Vincent C. Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey |
title | Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey |
title_full | Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey |
title_fullStr | Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey |
title_short | Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey |
title_sort | oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32854702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02207-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yipstevenm oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT meyersdaniele oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT sislerjeff oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT wycliffejoneskeith oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT kucharskiedward oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT elserchristine oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT templeoberleclaire oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT spadaforasilvana oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT ingledewparisann oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT giulianimeredith oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT kuruvillasara oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT sumarnureen oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey AT tamvincentc oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey |