Cargando…

Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the current state of oncology education in Canadian family medicine postgraduate medical education programs (FM PGME) and examine opinions regarding optimal oncology education in these programs. METHODS: A survey was designed to evaluate ideal and current on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yip, Steven M., Meyers, Daniel E., Sisler, Jeff, Wycliffe-Jones, Keith, Kucharski, Edward, Elser, Christine, Temple-Oberle, Claire, Spadafora, Silvana, Ingledew, Paris-Ann, Giuliani, Meredith, Kuruvilla, Sara, Sumar, Nureen, Tam, Vincent C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32854702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02207-0
_version_ 1783575960904269824
author Yip, Steven M.
Meyers, Daniel E.
Sisler, Jeff
Wycliffe-Jones, Keith
Kucharski, Edward
Elser, Christine
Temple-Oberle, Claire
Spadafora, Silvana
Ingledew, Paris-Ann
Giuliani, Meredith
Kuruvilla, Sara
Sumar, Nureen
Tam, Vincent C.
author_facet Yip, Steven M.
Meyers, Daniel E.
Sisler, Jeff
Wycliffe-Jones, Keith
Kucharski, Edward
Elser, Christine
Temple-Oberle, Claire
Spadafora, Silvana
Ingledew, Paris-Ann
Giuliani, Meredith
Kuruvilla, Sara
Sumar, Nureen
Tam, Vincent C.
author_sort Yip, Steven M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the current state of oncology education in Canadian family medicine postgraduate medical education programs (FM PGME) and examine opinions regarding optimal oncology education in these programs. METHODS: A survey was designed to evaluate ideal and current oncology teaching, educational topics, objectives, and competencies in FM PGMEs. The survey was sent to Canadian family medicine (FM) residents and program directors (PDs). RESULTS: In total, 150 residents and 17 PDs affiliated with 16 of 17 Canadian medical schools completed the survey. The majority indicated their programs do not have a mandatory clinical rotation in oncology (79% residents, 88% PDs). Low rates of residents (7%) and PDs (13%) reported FM residents being adequately prepared for their role in caring for cancer patients (p = 0.03). Residents and PDs believed the most optimal method of teaching oncology is through clinical exposure (65% residents, 80% PDs). Residents and PDs agreed the most important topics to learn (rated ≥4.7 on 5-point Likert scale) were: performing pap smears, cancer screening/prevention, breaking bad news, and approach to patient with increased cancer risk. According to residents, other important topics such as appropriate cancer patient referrals, managing cancer complications and post-treatment surveillance were only taught at frequencies of 52, 40 and 36%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current FM PGME oncology education is suboptimal, although the degree differs in the opinion of residents and PDs. This study identified topics and methods of education which could be focussed upon to improve FM oncology education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7457241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74572412020-08-31 Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey Yip, Steven M. Meyers, Daniel E. Sisler, Jeff Wycliffe-Jones, Keith Kucharski, Edward Elser, Christine Temple-Oberle, Claire Spadafora, Silvana Ingledew, Paris-Ann Giuliani, Meredith Kuruvilla, Sara Sumar, Nureen Tam, Vincent C. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the current state of oncology education in Canadian family medicine postgraduate medical education programs (FM PGME) and examine opinions regarding optimal oncology education in these programs. METHODS: A survey was designed to evaluate ideal and current oncology teaching, educational topics, objectives, and competencies in FM PGMEs. The survey was sent to Canadian family medicine (FM) residents and program directors (PDs). RESULTS: In total, 150 residents and 17 PDs affiliated with 16 of 17 Canadian medical schools completed the survey. The majority indicated their programs do not have a mandatory clinical rotation in oncology (79% residents, 88% PDs). Low rates of residents (7%) and PDs (13%) reported FM residents being adequately prepared for their role in caring for cancer patients (p = 0.03). Residents and PDs believed the most optimal method of teaching oncology is through clinical exposure (65% residents, 80% PDs). Residents and PDs agreed the most important topics to learn (rated ≥4.7 on 5-point Likert scale) were: performing pap smears, cancer screening/prevention, breaking bad news, and approach to patient with increased cancer risk. According to residents, other important topics such as appropriate cancer patient referrals, managing cancer complications and post-treatment surveillance were only taught at frequencies of 52, 40 and 36%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current FM PGME oncology education is suboptimal, although the degree differs in the opinion of residents and PDs. This study identified topics and methods of education which could be focussed upon to improve FM oncology education. BioMed Central 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7457241/ /pubmed/32854702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02207-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yip, Steven M.
Meyers, Daniel E.
Sisler, Jeff
Wycliffe-Jones, Keith
Kucharski, Edward
Elser, Christine
Temple-Oberle, Claire
Spadafora, Silvana
Ingledew, Paris-Ann
Giuliani, Meredith
Kuruvilla, Sara
Sumar, Nureen
Tam, Vincent C.
Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey
title Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey
title_full Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey
title_fullStr Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey
title_full_unstemmed Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey
title_short Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey
title_sort oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32854702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02207-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yipstevenm oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT meyersdaniele oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT sislerjeff oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT wycliffejoneskeith oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT kucharskiedward oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT elserchristine oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT templeoberleclaire oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT spadaforasilvana oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT ingledewparisann oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT giulianimeredith oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT kuruvillasara oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT sumarnureen oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey
AT tamvincentc oncologyeducationforfamilymedicineresidentsanationalneedsassessmentsurvey