Cargando…

Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis

Background. The assessment of value along the clinical development of new biopharmaceutical compounds is a challenging task. Complex and uncertain evidence has to be analyzed, considering a multitude of value preferences from different stakeholders. Objective. To investigate the use of multicriteria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angelis, Aris, Thursz, Mark, Ratziu, Vlad, O’Brien, Alastair, Serfaty, Lawrence, Canbay, Ali, Schiefke, Ingolf, Costa, Joao Bana e, Lecomte, Pascal, Kanavos, Panos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20940672
_version_ 1783575997791076352
author Angelis, Aris
Thursz, Mark
Ratziu, Vlad
O’Brien, Alastair
Serfaty, Lawrence
Canbay, Ali
Schiefke, Ingolf
Costa, Joao Bana e
Lecomte, Pascal
Kanavos, Panos
author_facet Angelis, Aris
Thursz, Mark
Ratziu, Vlad
O’Brien, Alastair
Serfaty, Lawrence
Canbay, Ali
Schiefke, Ingolf
Costa, Joao Bana e
Lecomte, Pascal
Kanavos, Panos
author_sort Angelis, Aris
collection PubMed
description Background. The assessment of value along the clinical development of new biopharmaceutical compounds is a challenging task. Complex and uncertain evidence has to be analyzed, considering a multitude of value preferences from different stakeholders. Objective. To investigate the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support decision making during drug development while considering payer and health technology assessment (HTA) value concerns, by applying the Advance Value Framework in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and testing for the consistency of the results. Design. A multiattribute value theory methodology was applied and 2 rounds of decision conferences (DCs) were organized in 3 countries (England, France, and Germany), with the participation of national key experts and stakeholders using the MACBETH questioning protocol and algorithm. A total of 51 health care professionals, patient advocates, and methodologists, including (ex-) committee members or assessors from national HTA bodies, participated in 6 DCs in the study countries. Target Population. NASH patients in fibrosis stages F2 to 3 were considered. Interventions. The value of a hypothetical product profile was assessed against 3 compounds under development using their phase 2 results. Outcome Measures. DC participants’ value preferences were elicited involving criteria selection, options scoring, and criteria weighting. Results. Highly consistent valuation rankings were observed in all DCs, always favoring the same compound. Highly consistent rankings of criteria clusters were observed, favoring therapeutic benefit criteria, followed by safety profile and innovation level criteria. Limitations. There was a lack of comparative treatment effects, early evidence on surrogate endpoints was used, and stakeholder representativeness was limited in some DCs. Conclusions. The use of MCDA is promising in supporting early HTA, illustrating high consistency in results across countries and between study rounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7457462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74574622020-09-16 Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis Angelis, Aris Thursz, Mark Ratziu, Vlad O’Brien, Alastair Serfaty, Lawrence Canbay, Ali Schiefke, Ingolf Costa, Joao Bana e Lecomte, Pascal Kanavos, Panos Med Decis Making Original Articles Background. The assessment of value along the clinical development of new biopharmaceutical compounds is a challenging task. Complex and uncertain evidence has to be analyzed, considering a multitude of value preferences from different stakeholders. Objective. To investigate the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support decision making during drug development while considering payer and health technology assessment (HTA) value concerns, by applying the Advance Value Framework in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and testing for the consistency of the results. Design. A multiattribute value theory methodology was applied and 2 rounds of decision conferences (DCs) were organized in 3 countries (England, France, and Germany), with the participation of national key experts and stakeholders using the MACBETH questioning protocol and algorithm. A total of 51 health care professionals, patient advocates, and methodologists, including (ex-) committee members or assessors from national HTA bodies, participated in 6 DCs in the study countries. Target Population. NASH patients in fibrosis stages F2 to 3 were considered. Interventions. The value of a hypothetical product profile was assessed against 3 compounds under development using their phase 2 results. Outcome Measures. DC participants’ value preferences were elicited involving criteria selection, options scoring, and criteria weighting. Results. Highly consistent valuation rankings were observed in all DCs, always favoring the same compound. Highly consistent rankings of criteria clusters were observed, favoring therapeutic benefit criteria, followed by safety profile and innovation level criteria. Limitations. There was a lack of comparative treatment effects, early evidence on surrogate endpoints was used, and stakeholder representativeness was limited in some DCs. Conclusions. The use of MCDA is promising in supporting early HTA, illustrating high consistency in results across countries and between study rounds. SAGE Publications 2020-08-26 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7457462/ /pubmed/32845234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20940672 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Angelis, Aris
Thursz, Mark
Ratziu, Vlad
O’Brien, Alastair
Serfaty, Lawrence
Canbay, Ali
Schiefke, Ingolf
Costa, Joao Bana e
Lecomte, Pascal
Kanavos, Panos
Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis
title Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis
title_full Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis
title_fullStr Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis
title_short Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis
title_sort early health technology assessment during nonalcoholic steatohepatitis drug development: a two-round, cross-country, multicriteria decision analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20940672
work_keys_str_mv AT angelisaris earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT thurszmark earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT ratziuvlad earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT obrienalastair earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT serfatylawrence earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT canbayali earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT schiefkeingolf earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT costajoaobanae earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT lecomtepascal earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT kanavospanos earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis