Cargando…
Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis
Background. The assessment of value along the clinical development of new biopharmaceutical compounds is a challenging task. Complex and uncertain evidence has to be analyzed, considering a multitude of value preferences from different stakeholders. Objective. To investigate the use of multicriteria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20940672 |
_version_ | 1783575997791076352 |
---|---|
author | Angelis, Aris Thursz, Mark Ratziu, Vlad O’Brien, Alastair Serfaty, Lawrence Canbay, Ali Schiefke, Ingolf Costa, Joao Bana e Lecomte, Pascal Kanavos, Panos |
author_facet | Angelis, Aris Thursz, Mark Ratziu, Vlad O’Brien, Alastair Serfaty, Lawrence Canbay, Ali Schiefke, Ingolf Costa, Joao Bana e Lecomte, Pascal Kanavos, Panos |
author_sort | Angelis, Aris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The assessment of value along the clinical development of new biopharmaceutical compounds is a challenging task. Complex and uncertain evidence has to be analyzed, considering a multitude of value preferences from different stakeholders. Objective. To investigate the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support decision making during drug development while considering payer and health technology assessment (HTA) value concerns, by applying the Advance Value Framework in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and testing for the consistency of the results. Design. A multiattribute value theory methodology was applied and 2 rounds of decision conferences (DCs) were organized in 3 countries (England, France, and Germany), with the participation of national key experts and stakeholders using the MACBETH questioning protocol and algorithm. A total of 51 health care professionals, patient advocates, and methodologists, including (ex-) committee members or assessors from national HTA bodies, participated in 6 DCs in the study countries. Target Population. NASH patients in fibrosis stages F2 to 3 were considered. Interventions. The value of a hypothetical product profile was assessed against 3 compounds under development using their phase 2 results. Outcome Measures. DC participants’ value preferences were elicited involving criteria selection, options scoring, and criteria weighting. Results. Highly consistent valuation rankings were observed in all DCs, always favoring the same compound. Highly consistent rankings of criteria clusters were observed, favoring therapeutic benefit criteria, followed by safety profile and innovation level criteria. Limitations. There was a lack of comparative treatment effects, early evidence on surrogate endpoints was used, and stakeholder representativeness was limited in some DCs. Conclusions. The use of MCDA is promising in supporting early HTA, illustrating high consistency in results across countries and between study rounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7457462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74574622020-09-16 Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis Angelis, Aris Thursz, Mark Ratziu, Vlad O’Brien, Alastair Serfaty, Lawrence Canbay, Ali Schiefke, Ingolf Costa, Joao Bana e Lecomte, Pascal Kanavos, Panos Med Decis Making Original Articles Background. The assessment of value along the clinical development of new biopharmaceutical compounds is a challenging task. Complex and uncertain evidence has to be analyzed, considering a multitude of value preferences from different stakeholders. Objective. To investigate the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support decision making during drug development while considering payer and health technology assessment (HTA) value concerns, by applying the Advance Value Framework in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and testing for the consistency of the results. Design. A multiattribute value theory methodology was applied and 2 rounds of decision conferences (DCs) were organized in 3 countries (England, France, and Germany), with the participation of national key experts and stakeholders using the MACBETH questioning protocol and algorithm. A total of 51 health care professionals, patient advocates, and methodologists, including (ex-) committee members or assessors from national HTA bodies, participated in 6 DCs in the study countries. Target Population. NASH patients in fibrosis stages F2 to 3 were considered. Interventions. The value of a hypothetical product profile was assessed against 3 compounds under development using their phase 2 results. Outcome Measures. DC participants’ value preferences were elicited involving criteria selection, options scoring, and criteria weighting. Results. Highly consistent valuation rankings were observed in all DCs, always favoring the same compound. Highly consistent rankings of criteria clusters were observed, favoring therapeutic benefit criteria, followed by safety profile and innovation level criteria. Limitations. There was a lack of comparative treatment effects, early evidence on surrogate endpoints was used, and stakeholder representativeness was limited in some DCs. Conclusions. The use of MCDA is promising in supporting early HTA, illustrating high consistency in results across countries and between study rounds. SAGE Publications 2020-08-26 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7457462/ /pubmed/32845234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20940672 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Angelis, Aris Thursz, Mark Ratziu, Vlad O’Brien, Alastair Serfaty, Lawrence Canbay, Ali Schiefke, Ingolf Costa, Joao Bana e Lecomte, Pascal Kanavos, Panos Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis |
title | Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis |
title_full | Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis |
title_fullStr | Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis |
title_short | Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis |
title_sort | early health technology assessment during nonalcoholic steatohepatitis drug development: a two-round, cross-country, multicriteria decision analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20940672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angelisaris earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT thurszmark earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT ratziuvlad earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT obrienalastair earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT serfatylawrence earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT canbayali earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT schiefkeingolf earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT costajoaobanae earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT lecomtepascal earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT kanavospanos earlyhealthtechnologyassessmentduringnonalcoholicsteatohepatitisdrugdevelopmentatworoundcrosscountrymulticriteriadecisionanalysis |