Cargando…

The Comparative Study of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography Between Twin and Singleton Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cervical shear wave elastography (SWE) by using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) between twin and singleton pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study involving the twin and singleton pregnant women who attended the antenatal care at Ramathibodi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diawtipsukon, Sanpon, Bumrungphuet, Sommart, Dulyaphat, Wirada, Panburana, Panyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922090
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S251522
_version_ 1783576058038059008
author Diawtipsukon, Sanpon
Bumrungphuet, Sommart
Dulyaphat, Wirada
Panburana, Panyu
author_facet Diawtipsukon, Sanpon
Bumrungphuet, Sommart
Dulyaphat, Wirada
Panburana, Panyu
author_sort Diawtipsukon, Sanpon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the cervical shear wave elastography (SWE) by using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) between twin and singleton pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study involving the twin and singleton pregnant women who attended the antenatal care at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The participants who met the inclusion criteria were serially measured the shear wave speed (SWS) by using TVS at early, mid-, and third trimester. The changes in SWS with advancing gestational age between twin and singleton pregnancies were evaluated. The gestational age at delivery and spontaneous preterm delivery rate were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 twin pregnancies and 38 singleton pregnancies were analyzed. No significant difference in baseline characteristics, except the age of participants (twin pregnancies 33.1±4.6 years, singleton pregnancies 29.9±5.4 years, p-value = 0.006) was observed. The cervical SWS decreased with advancing gestational age in both twin and singleton pregnancy, but there was a statistically significant difference of cervical SWS at the lower point in mid-trimester (twin pregnancies 2.27±0.4, singleton pregnancies 2.71±0.6 m/s, p-value = 0.001). However, no significant difference in cervical SWS at the upper point and the lower point in the early and third trimester was demonstrated. Even though the gestational age at delivery between both groups revealed a significant difference (twin pregnancies 35.9±2.8, singleton pregnancies 37.6±2.9 wk., p-value = 0.008) but the spontaneous preterm delivery rate did not differ significantly (twin pregnancies 22.2%, singleton pregnancies 15.8%, p-value = 0.483). CONCLUSION: The mid-trimester cervical SWS measurement at the lower point detects the difference in cervical softness between twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies. The cervical SWS might be an additional option for monitoring the change in cervical softness in twin pregnancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7457743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74577432020-09-11 The Comparative Study of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography Between Twin and Singleton Pregnancy Diawtipsukon, Sanpon Bumrungphuet, Sommart Dulyaphat, Wirada Panburana, Panyu Int J Womens Health Clinical Trial Report OBJECTIVE: To compare the cervical shear wave elastography (SWE) by using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) between twin and singleton pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study involving the twin and singleton pregnant women who attended the antenatal care at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The participants who met the inclusion criteria were serially measured the shear wave speed (SWS) by using TVS at early, mid-, and third trimester. The changes in SWS with advancing gestational age between twin and singleton pregnancies were evaluated. The gestational age at delivery and spontaneous preterm delivery rate were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 twin pregnancies and 38 singleton pregnancies were analyzed. No significant difference in baseline characteristics, except the age of participants (twin pregnancies 33.1±4.6 years, singleton pregnancies 29.9±5.4 years, p-value = 0.006) was observed. The cervical SWS decreased with advancing gestational age in both twin and singleton pregnancy, but there was a statistically significant difference of cervical SWS at the lower point in mid-trimester (twin pregnancies 2.27±0.4, singleton pregnancies 2.71±0.6 m/s, p-value = 0.001). However, no significant difference in cervical SWS at the upper point and the lower point in the early and third trimester was demonstrated. Even though the gestational age at delivery between both groups revealed a significant difference (twin pregnancies 35.9±2.8, singleton pregnancies 37.6±2.9 wk., p-value = 0.008) but the spontaneous preterm delivery rate did not differ significantly (twin pregnancies 22.2%, singleton pregnancies 15.8%, p-value = 0.483). CONCLUSION: The mid-trimester cervical SWS measurement at the lower point detects the difference in cervical softness between twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies. The cervical SWS might be an additional option for monitoring the change in cervical softness in twin pregnancies. Dove 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7457743/ /pubmed/32922090 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S251522 Text en © 2020 Diawtipsukon et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Diawtipsukon, Sanpon
Bumrungphuet, Sommart
Dulyaphat, Wirada
Panburana, Panyu
The Comparative Study of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography Between Twin and Singleton Pregnancy
title The Comparative Study of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography Between Twin and Singleton Pregnancy
title_full The Comparative Study of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography Between Twin and Singleton Pregnancy
title_fullStr The Comparative Study of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography Between Twin and Singleton Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed The Comparative Study of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography Between Twin and Singleton Pregnancy
title_short The Comparative Study of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography Between Twin and Singleton Pregnancy
title_sort comparative study of cervical shear wave elastography between twin and singleton pregnancy
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922090
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S251522
work_keys_str_mv AT diawtipsukonsanpon thecomparativestudyofcervicalshearwaveelastographybetweentwinandsingletonpregnancy
AT bumrungphuetsommart thecomparativestudyofcervicalshearwaveelastographybetweentwinandsingletonpregnancy
AT dulyaphatwirada thecomparativestudyofcervicalshearwaveelastographybetweentwinandsingletonpregnancy
AT panburanapanyu thecomparativestudyofcervicalshearwaveelastographybetweentwinandsingletonpregnancy
AT diawtipsukonsanpon comparativestudyofcervicalshearwaveelastographybetweentwinandsingletonpregnancy
AT bumrungphuetsommart comparativestudyofcervicalshearwaveelastographybetweentwinandsingletonpregnancy
AT dulyaphatwirada comparativestudyofcervicalshearwaveelastographybetweentwinandsingletonpregnancy
AT panburanapanyu comparativestudyofcervicalshearwaveelastographybetweentwinandsingletonpregnancy