Cargando…

Exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in England

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the most effective and cost-effective management of ankle fractures is sparse but evolving. A recent large RCT in older patients with unstable fractures found that management with close-contact-casting was functionally equivalent and more cost-effective than internal fixation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Lauren J., Jones, Tim, Whitehouse, Michael R., Robinson, Peter W., Hollingworth, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05682-9
_version_ 1783576062388600832
author Scott, Lauren J.
Jones, Tim
Whitehouse, Michael R.
Robinson, Peter W.
Hollingworth, William
author_facet Scott, Lauren J.
Jones, Tim
Whitehouse, Michael R.
Robinson, Peter W.
Hollingworth, William
author_sort Scott, Lauren J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence on the most effective and cost-effective management of ankle fractures is sparse but evolving. A recent large RCT in older patients with unstable fractures found that management with close-contact-casting was functionally equivalent and more cost-effective than internal fixation. We describe temporal and geographic variation in ankle fracture management and estimate the potential savings if close-contact-casting was used more often in older patients. METHODS: Patients admitted to hospital in England between 2007/08 and 2016/17 with an ankle fracture were identified using routine hospital episode statistics. We tested whether the use of internal fixation, and the proportion of internal fixations using intramedullary implants, changed over time. We estimated the potential annual cost savings if patients aged 60+ years were treated with close-contact-casting rather than internal fixation, in line with emerging evidence. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, there were 223,465 hospital admissions with a primary ankle fracture diagnosis. The incidence (per 100,000) of internal fixation was fairly consistent over time in younger (33.2 in 2007/08, 30.9 in 2016/17) and older (36.5 in 2007/08, 37.4 in 2016/17) patients. The proportion of internal fixations which used intramedullary implants increased in both age groups (17.0–19.5% < 60 years; 15.2–17.4% 60+ years). In 2016/17, the cost of inpatient hospital care for ankle fractures in England was over £63.1million. If 50% of older patients who had an internal fixation instead had close-contact-casting, we estimate that approximately £1.56million could have been saved. CONCLUSIONS: Despite emerging evidence that non-surgical and surgical management achieve equivalent functional outcomes in older patients, the rate of surgical fixation has remained relatively stable over the decade. The health service could achieve substantial savings if a higher proportion of older patients were treated with close-contact-casting, in line with recent evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7457765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74577652020-09-02 Exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in England Scott, Lauren J. Jones, Tim Whitehouse, Michael R. Robinson, Peter W. Hollingworth, William BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Evidence on the most effective and cost-effective management of ankle fractures is sparse but evolving. A recent large RCT in older patients with unstable fractures found that management with close-contact-casting was functionally equivalent and more cost-effective than internal fixation. We describe temporal and geographic variation in ankle fracture management and estimate the potential savings if close-contact-casting was used more often in older patients. METHODS: Patients admitted to hospital in England between 2007/08 and 2016/17 with an ankle fracture were identified using routine hospital episode statistics. We tested whether the use of internal fixation, and the proportion of internal fixations using intramedullary implants, changed over time. We estimated the potential annual cost savings if patients aged 60+ years were treated with close-contact-casting rather than internal fixation, in line with emerging evidence. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, there were 223,465 hospital admissions with a primary ankle fracture diagnosis. The incidence (per 100,000) of internal fixation was fairly consistent over time in younger (33.2 in 2007/08, 30.9 in 2016/17) and older (36.5 in 2007/08, 37.4 in 2016/17) patients. The proportion of internal fixations which used intramedullary implants increased in both age groups (17.0–19.5% < 60 years; 15.2–17.4% 60+ years). In 2016/17, the cost of inpatient hospital care for ankle fractures in England was over £63.1million. If 50% of older patients who had an internal fixation instead had close-contact-casting, we estimate that approximately £1.56million could have been saved. CONCLUSIONS: Despite emerging evidence that non-surgical and surgical management achieve equivalent functional outcomes in older patients, the rate of surgical fixation has remained relatively stable over the decade. The health service could achieve substantial savings if a higher proportion of older patients were treated with close-contact-casting, in line with recent evidence. BioMed Central 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7457765/ /pubmed/32867779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05682-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scott, Lauren J.
Jones, Tim
Whitehouse, Michael R.
Robinson, Peter W.
Hollingworth, William
Exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in England
title Exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in England
title_full Exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in England
title_fullStr Exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in England
title_full_unstemmed Exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in England
title_short Exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in England
title_sort exploring trends in admissions and treatment for ankle fractures: a longitudinal cohort study of routinely collected hospital data in england
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05682-9
work_keys_str_mv AT scottlaurenj exploringtrendsinadmissionsandtreatmentforanklefracturesalongitudinalcohortstudyofroutinelycollectedhospitaldatainengland
AT jonestim exploringtrendsinadmissionsandtreatmentforanklefracturesalongitudinalcohortstudyofroutinelycollectedhospitaldatainengland
AT whitehousemichaelr exploringtrendsinadmissionsandtreatmentforanklefracturesalongitudinalcohortstudyofroutinelycollectedhospitaldatainengland
AT robinsonpeterw exploringtrendsinadmissionsandtreatmentforanklefracturesalongitudinalcohortstudyofroutinelycollectedhospitaldatainengland
AT hollingworthwilliam exploringtrendsinadmissionsandtreatmentforanklefracturesalongitudinalcohortstudyofroutinelycollectedhospitaldatainengland