Cargando…

Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

SUBJECT: This study compared clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) anteromedial (AM) bundle augmentation and single-bundle ACL reconstruction. PURPOSE: We compared the clinical results and the second-look arthroscopic findings between (1)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Gil Yeong, Lee, Tae Hun, Lee, Kyung Jin, Woo, Sangwon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00058-z
_version_ 1783576070199443456
author Ahn, Gil Yeong
Lee, Tae Hun
Lee, Kyung Jin
Woo, Sangwon
author_facet Ahn, Gil Yeong
Lee, Tae Hun
Lee, Kyung Jin
Woo, Sangwon
author_sort Ahn, Gil Yeong
collection PubMed
description SUBJECT: This study compared clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) anteromedial (AM) bundle augmentation and single-bundle ACL reconstruction. PURPOSE: We compared the clinical results and the second-look arthroscopic findings between (1) single-bundle ACL reconstruction in complete rupture and (2) ACL AM bundle augmentation in isolated AM bundle rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients underwent ACL surgery from January 2013 to December 2018. Group 1, who had 64 cases of single-bundle ACL reconstruction with second-look arthroscopy, and Group 2, who had 21 cases of AM bundle augmentation of ACL with second-look arthroscopy, were targeted. We evaluated and compared the clinical results (Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test) and synovialization at second-look arthroscopy before the operation and in the final follow-up period, between Group 1 and Group 2. RESULTS: The Lysholm score (p = 0.96) and Tegner activity score (p = 0.351) at final follow-up (mean 27.1 months) were 78.3 and 7.2 in Group 1 and 89.1 and 8.1 in Group 2, respectively. The Lachman test (p = 0.074) and pivot-shift test (p = 0.031) results at final follow-up were improved; however, there was no statistical significance. Second-look arthroscopy showed that percentages of synovialization area of grafted tendon at mean 15.6 months follow-up were 61.4% and 93.1% in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.008). The synovial coverage in Group 2 was higher than in Group 1. CONCLUSION: The AM bundle augmentation for ACL injury in which the posterolateral bundle was preserved showed better clinical scores and synovial coverage than single-bundle ACL reconstruction for complete ACL rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: The level of evidence is Level III, retrospective with case series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7457806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74578062020-09-09 Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Ahn, Gil Yeong Lee, Tae Hun Lee, Kyung Jin Woo, Sangwon Knee Surg Relat Res Review Article SUBJECT: This study compared clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) anteromedial (AM) bundle augmentation and single-bundle ACL reconstruction. PURPOSE: We compared the clinical results and the second-look arthroscopic findings between (1) single-bundle ACL reconstruction in complete rupture and (2) ACL AM bundle augmentation in isolated AM bundle rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients underwent ACL surgery from January 2013 to December 2018. Group 1, who had 64 cases of single-bundle ACL reconstruction with second-look arthroscopy, and Group 2, who had 21 cases of AM bundle augmentation of ACL with second-look arthroscopy, were targeted. We evaluated and compared the clinical results (Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test) and synovialization at second-look arthroscopy before the operation and in the final follow-up period, between Group 1 and Group 2. RESULTS: The Lysholm score (p = 0.96) and Tegner activity score (p = 0.351) at final follow-up (mean 27.1 months) were 78.3 and 7.2 in Group 1 and 89.1 and 8.1 in Group 2, respectively. The Lachman test (p = 0.074) and pivot-shift test (p = 0.031) results at final follow-up were improved; however, there was no statistical significance. Second-look arthroscopy showed that percentages of synovialization area of grafted tendon at mean 15.6 months follow-up were 61.4% and 93.1% in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.008). The synovial coverage in Group 2 was higher than in Group 1. CONCLUSION: The AM bundle augmentation for ACL injury in which the posterolateral bundle was preserved showed better clinical scores and synovial coverage than single-bundle ACL reconstruction for complete ACL rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: The level of evidence is Level III, retrospective with case series. BioMed Central 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7457806/ /pubmed/32867827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00058-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ahn, Gil Yeong
Lee, Tae Hun
Lee, Kyung Jin
Woo, Sangwon
Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_short Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00058-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ahngilyeong comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandsecondlookarthroscopicevaluationsbetweenanteriorcruciateligamentanteromedialbundleaugmentationandsinglebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT leetaehun comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandsecondlookarthroscopicevaluationsbetweenanteriorcruciateligamentanteromedialbundleaugmentationandsinglebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT leekyungjin comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandsecondlookarthroscopicevaluationsbetweenanteriorcruciateligamentanteromedialbundleaugmentationandsinglebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT woosangwon comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandsecondlookarthroscopicevaluationsbetweenanteriorcruciateligamentanteromedialbundleaugmentationandsinglebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction