Cargando…
Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs
BACKGROUND: Exosomes are nano-sized extracellular vesicles containing different biomolecules such as proteins and microRNAs (miRNAs) that mediate intercellular communication. Recently, numerous studies have reported the important functions of exosomal miRNAs in disease development and the potential...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923177 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9434 |
_version_ | 1783576096332054528 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Yirui Qu, Xiangyun Dong, Zhaonan Zeng, Qingyu Ma, Xueqing Jia, Yunli Li, Ruochen Jiang, Xiaoxu Williams, Cecilia Wang, Tao Xia, Weiliang |
author_facet | Cheng, Yirui Qu, Xiangyun Dong, Zhaonan Zeng, Qingyu Ma, Xueqing Jia, Yunli Li, Ruochen Jiang, Xiaoxu Williams, Cecilia Wang, Tao Xia, Weiliang |
author_sort | Cheng, Yirui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Exosomes are nano-sized extracellular vesicles containing different biomolecules such as proteins and microRNAs (miRNAs) that mediate intercellular communication. Recently, numerous studies have reported the important functions of exosomal miRNAs in disease development and the potential clinical application as diagnostic biomarkers. Up to now, the most commonly used methods to extract exosomes are ultracentrifugation (UC) and precipitation-based commercial kit (e.g., ExoQuick). Generally, both UC and ExoQuick method could co-isolate contaminating proteins along with exosomes, with the UC method yielding even purer exosomes than ExoQuick. However, the comparison of these two methods on co-precipitated free miRNAs is still unknown. METHODS: In this study, we isolated exosomes from the human serum with exogenously added cel-miR-39 by UC and ExoQuick and compared the proportion of cel-miR-39 co-precipitated with exosomes extracted by these two methods. RESULTS: Using exogenous cel-miR-39 as free miRNAs in serum, we concluded that ExoQuick co-isolates a small proportion of free miRNAs while UC hardly precipitates any free miRNAs. We also found that incubation at 37 °C for 1 h could decrease the proportion of free miRNAs, and exosomal miRNAs like miR-126 and miR-152 also decreased when RNase A was used. In conclusion, our findings provide essential information about the details of serum exosome isolation methods for further research on exosomal miRNAs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7457927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74579272020-09-11 Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs Cheng, Yirui Qu, Xiangyun Dong, Zhaonan Zeng, Qingyu Ma, Xueqing Jia, Yunli Li, Ruochen Jiang, Xiaoxu Williams, Cecilia Wang, Tao Xia, Weiliang PeerJ Bioengineering BACKGROUND: Exosomes are nano-sized extracellular vesicles containing different biomolecules such as proteins and microRNAs (miRNAs) that mediate intercellular communication. Recently, numerous studies have reported the important functions of exosomal miRNAs in disease development and the potential clinical application as diagnostic biomarkers. Up to now, the most commonly used methods to extract exosomes are ultracentrifugation (UC) and precipitation-based commercial kit (e.g., ExoQuick). Generally, both UC and ExoQuick method could co-isolate contaminating proteins along with exosomes, with the UC method yielding even purer exosomes than ExoQuick. However, the comparison of these two methods on co-precipitated free miRNAs is still unknown. METHODS: In this study, we isolated exosomes from the human serum with exogenously added cel-miR-39 by UC and ExoQuick and compared the proportion of cel-miR-39 co-precipitated with exosomes extracted by these two methods. RESULTS: Using exogenous cel-miR-39 as free miRNAs in serum, we concluded that ExoQuick co-isolates a small proportion of free miRNAs while UC hardly precipitates any free miRNAs. We also found that incubation at 37 °C for 1 h could decrease the proportion of free miRNAs, and exosomal miRNAs like miR-126 and miR-152 also decreased when RNase A was used. In conclusion, our findings provide essential information about the details of serum exosome isolation methods for further research on exosomal miRNAs. PeerJ Inc. 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7457927/ /pubmed/32923177 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9434 Text en ©2020 Cheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering Cheng, Yirui Qu, Xiangyun Dong, Zhaonan Zeng, Qingyu Ma, Xueqing Jia, Yunli Li, Ruochen Jiang, Xiaoxu Williams, Cecilia Wang, Tao Xia, Weiliang Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs |
title | Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs |
title_full | Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs |
title_fullStr | Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs |
title_short | Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free microRNAs |
title_sort | comparison of serum exosome isolation methods on co-precipitated free micrornas |
topic | Bioengineering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923177 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengyirui comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT quxiangyun comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT dongzhaonan comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT zengqingyu comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT maxueqing comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT jiayunli comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT liruochen comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT jiangxiaoxu comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT williamscecilia comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT wangtao comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas AT xiaweiliang comparisonofserumexosomeisolationmethodsoncoprecipitatedfreemicrornas |