Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—A prospective randomised double blind study
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation cause significant derangement of the haemodynamic parameters proving detrimental for some patients. Clonidine, an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, and melatonin, the pineal hormone, have been used for the attenuation of these haemodynamic resp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934404 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_76_20 |
_version_ | 1783576104748974080 |
---|---|
author | Choudhary, Santosh Sharma, Sandeep Kumari, Indira Kalluraya, Swathi Meena, Khemraj Dave, Tanuj |
author_facet | Choudhary, Santosh Sharma, Sandeep Kumari, Indira Kalluraya, Swathi Meena, Khemraj Dave, Tanuj |
author_sort | Choudhary, Santosh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation cause significant derangement of the haemodynamic parameters proving detrimental for some patients. Clonidine, an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, and melatonin, the pineal hormone, have been used for the attenuation of these haemodynamic responses. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of oral melatonin and clonidine in attenuating the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomised double-blind study, 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients aged 20–60 years of either gender scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into Group M and Group C and orally received 6 mg of melatonin and 0.2 mg of clonidine, respectively, 120 min before the induction of anaesthesia. The haemodynamic parameters-heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and rate -pressure product(RPP) were recorded before and 120 min after the administration of the study drug, before induction, immediately after intubation and at 1, 3, 5 and 10 min following intubation. Sedation was assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale. The qualitative and quantitative variables were analysed using Chi square test and unpaired student t test, respectively. For intragroup comparison of quantitative data, paired t test was applied. A P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: A significant difference was noted between the groups regarding HR and RPP 0, 1, 3 and 5 min after intubation. The Ramsay sedation score ranged between 2 and 3 at all time intervals. CONCLUSION: Although both the drugs are effective, oral melatonin proved superior to oral clonidine in attenuating the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without any side effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7457986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74579862020-09-14 Comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—A prospective randomised double blind study Choudhary, Santosh Sharma, Sandeep Kumari, Indira Kalluraya, Swathi Meena, Khemraj Dave, Tanuj Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation cause significant derangement of the haemodynamic parameters proving detrimental for some patients. Clonidine, an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, and melatonin, the pineal hormone, have been used for the attenuation of these haemodynamic responses. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of oral melatonin and clonidine in attenuating the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomised double-blind study, 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients aged 20–60 years of either gender scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into Group M and Group C and orally received 6 mg of melatonin and 0.2 mg of clonidine, respectively, 120 min before the induction of anaesthesia. The haemodynamic parameters-heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and rate -pressure product(RPP) were recorded before and 120 min after the administration of the study drug, before induction, immediately after intubation and at 1, 3, 5 and 10 min following intubation. Sedation was assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale. The qualitative and quantitative variables were analysed using Chi square test and unpaired student t test, respectively. For intragroup comparison of quantitative data, paired t test was applied. A P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: A significant difference was noted between the groups regarding HR and RPP 0, 1, 3 and 5 min after intubation. The Ramsay sedation score ranged between 2 and 3 at all time intervals. CONCLUSION: Although both the drugs are effective, oral melatonin proved superior to oral clonidine in attenuating the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without any side effects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-08 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7457986/ /pubmed/32934404 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_76_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Choudhary, Santosh Sharma, Sandeep Kumari, Indira Kalluraya, Swathi Meena, Khemraj Dave, Tanuj Comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—A prospective randomised double blind study |
title | Comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—A prospective randomised double blind study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—A prospective randomised double blind study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—A prospective randomised double blind study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—A prospective randomised double blind study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—A prospective randomised double blind study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of oral melatonin and oral clonidine for the attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation—a prospective randomised double blind study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934404 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_76_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choudharysantosh comparativeevaluationoforalmelatoninandoralclonidinefortheattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationaprospectiverandomiseddoubleblindstudy AT sharmasandeep comparativeevaluationoforalmelatoninandoralclonidinefortheattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationaprospectiverandomiseddoubleblindstudy AT kumariindira comparativeevaluationoforalmelatoninandoralclonidinefortheattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationaprospectiverandomiseddoubleblindstudy AT kallurayaswathi comparativeevaluationoforalmelatoninandoralclonidinefortheattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationaprospectiverandomiseddoubleblindstudy AT meenakhemraj comparativeevaluationoforalmelatoninandoralclonidinefortheattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationaprospectiverandomiseddoubleblindstudy AT davetanuj comparativeevaluationoforalmelatoninandoralclonidinefortheattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandtrachealintubationaprospectiverandomiseddoubleblindstudy |