Cargando…
Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth
OBJECTIVE: To compare the anesthetic performances of 3% prilocaine and 4% articaine when used for the extraction of the maxillary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients, aged between 16 and 70 years, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group one received a...
Autor principal: | Gazal, Giath |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_94_20 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is Articaine More Potent than Mepivacaine for Use in Oral Surgery?
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2018) -
Is prilocaine safe and potent enough for use in the oral surgery of medically compromised patients
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of speed of action and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for pulpal anesthesia in mandibular teeth: A randomized, double-blind cross-over trial
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparison of the Anaesthesia Success Rate in Maxillary First and Second Molars with 3% Prilocaine as the Anaesthetic Agent
por: PARIROKH, Masoud, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions
por: Gazal, Giath, et al.
Publicado: (2017)