Cargando…

Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE: Walking and mind-body therapies (MBTs) are commonly recommended to relieve pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of walking and MBTs in CLBP. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nduwimana, Ildephonse, Nindorera, Félix, Thonnard, Jean Louis, Kossi, Oyene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32871946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021969
_version_ 1783576154558431232
author Nduwimana, Ildephonse
Nindorera, Félix
Thonnard, Jean Louis
Kossi, Oyene
author_facet Nduwimana, Ildephonse
Nindorera, Félix
Thonnard, Jean Louis
Kossi, Oyene
author_sort Nduwimana, Ildephonse
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Walking and mind-body therapies (MBTs) are commonly recommended to relieve pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of walking and MBTs in CLBP. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing walking or MBTs to any other intervention or control in adults with CLBP. Studies were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. The research was limited to studies published in English and French between January 2008 and December 2018. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed studies quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Statistical analyses were performed under a random-effects model. We analyzed pain and activity limitation, with the calculation of standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for the different treatment effects. RESULTS: Thirty one randomized controlled trials involving 3193 participants were analyzed. Walking was as effective as control interventions in the short-term and slightly superior in the intermediate term with respect to pain (Standardized mean differences (SMD)  = –0.34; 95% CI, –0.65 to –0.03; P = .03) and activity limitation (SMD = –0.30; 95% CI, –0.50 to –0.10; P = .003). In contrast, yoga was more effective than control interventions in the short term in terms of pain (SMD = –1.47; 95% CI, –2.26 to –0.68; P = .0003) and activity limitation (SMD = –1.17; 95% CI, –1.80 to –0.55; P = .0002). Yoga was no longer superior to the control interventions for pain at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: MBTs, especially yoga, seem to be more effective in the short term, and walking seems to be more effective in the intermediate term, for the relief of pain and activity limitation in patients with CLBP. A combination of walking and MBTs fits the biopsychosocial model and might be valuable therapy for CLBP throughout follow-up due to combined effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7458239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74582392020-09-11 Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials Nduwimana, Ildephonse Nindorera, Félix Thonnard, Jean Louis Kossi, Oyene Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 PURPOSE: Walking and mind-body therapies (MBTs) are commonly recommended to relieve pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of walking and MBTs in CLBP. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing walking or MBTs to any other intervention or control in adults with CLBP. Studies were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. The research was limited to studies published in English and French between January 2008 and December 2018. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed studies quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Statistical analyses were performed under a random-effects model. We analyzed pain and activity limitation, with the calculation of standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for the different treatment effects. RESULTS: Thirty one randomized controlled trials involving 3193 participants were analyzed. Walking was as effective as control interventions in the short-term and slightly superior in the intermediate term with respect to pain (Standardized mean differences (SMD)  = –0.34; 95% CI, –0.65 to –0.03; P = .03) and activity limitation (SMD = –0.30; 95% CI, –0.50 to –0.10; P = .003). In contrast, yoga was more effective than control interventions in the short term in terms of pain (SMD = –1.47; 95% CI, –2.26 to –0.68; P = .0003) and activity limitation (SMD = –1.17; 95% CI, –1.80 to –0.55; P = .0002). Yoga was no longer superior to the control interventions for pain at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: MBTs, especially yoga, seem to be more effective in the short term, and walking seems to be more effective in the intermediate term, for the relief of pain and activity limitation in patients with CLBP. A combination of walking and MBTs fits the biopsychosocial model and might be valuable therapy for CLBP throughout follow-up due to combined effects. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7458239/ /pubmed/32871946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021969 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 6300
Nduwimana, Ildephonse
Nindorera, Félix
Thonnard, Jean Louis
Kossi, Oyene
Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials
title Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials
title_full Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials
title_short Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials
topic 6300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32871946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021969
work_keys_str_mv AT nduwimanaildephonse effectivenessofwalkingversusmindbodytherapiesinchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT nindorerafelix effectivenessofwalkingversusmindbodytherapiesinchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT thonnardjeanlouis effectivenessofwalkingversusmindbodytherapiesinchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kossioyene effectivenessofwalkingversusmindbodytherapiesinchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials