Cargando…

Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different decompressive injection techniques in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes, if compared to the injection without pressure applied on the eye, following the intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuzzi, Raffaele, Scalabrin, Simona, Becco, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32921980
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S263474
_version_ 1783576162291679232
author Nuzzi, Raffaele
Scalabrin, Simona
Becco, Alice
author_facet Nuzzi, Raffaele
Scalabrin, Simona
Becco, Alice
author_sort Nuzzi, Raffaele
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different decompressive injection techniques in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes, if compared to the injection without pressure applied on the eye, following the intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with indication to intravitreal therapy were randomized into five arms: 40 received intravitreal injection without ocular decompression (arm A), 40 with pre-injection scleral indentation with cotton swab (arm B), 40 with pre-injection digital ocular massage (arm C), 40 with post-injection scleral indentation with cotton swab (arm D) and 40 with post-injection digital ocular massage (arm E). All patients underwent measurement of the IOP with Goldamm applanation tonometer 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the injection. The primary endpoint of the study was variation of the post- injection IOP with the different techniques. RESULTS: An increase in post-injection IOP was observed in all the arms, if compared to pre-injection values. The greatest increase was observed in arm A with a mean IOP rise of 17.60 mmHg. All other techniques showed lower mean IOP increases: arm B 10.76 mmHg, arm C 9.35 mmHg, arm D 8.8 mmHg, arm E 3.4 mmHg. The post-injection IOP differences of innovative techniques compared to the technique without ocular decompression were all statistically significant (p-value <0.01). If compared to arm A (35%), a reduction in IOP spike ≥40 mmHg frequency was also observed. The status of phakia/pseudophakia, a previous diagnosis of glaucoma and the underlying pathology for which indication was given to inject bevacizumab did not significantly alter the post-injection IOP in any of the protocols. CONCLUSION: The introduction of new injection protocols, such as injections performed before or after decompressive treatments, could be a safe and effective approach to control post-injection IOP increase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7458273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74582732020-09-11 Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared Nuzzi, Raffaele Scalabrin, Simona Becco, Alice Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different decompressive injection techniques in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes, if compared to the injection without pressure applied on the eye, following the intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with indication to intravitreal therapy were randomized into five arms: 40 received intravitreal injection without ocular decompression (arm A), 40 with pre-injection scleral indentation with cotton swab (arm B), 40 with pre-injection digital ocular massage (arm C), 40 with post-injection scleral indentation with cotton swab (arm D) and 40 with post-injection digital ocular massage (arm E). All patients underwent measurement of the IOP with Goldamm applanation tonometer 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the injection. The primary endpoint of the study was variation of the post- injection IOP with the different techniques. RESULTS: An increase in post-injection IOP was observed in all the arms, if compared to pre-injection values. The greatest increase was observed in arm A with a mean IOP rise of 17.60 mmHg. All other techniques showed lower mean IOP increases: arm B 10.76 mmHg, arm C 9.35 mmHg, arm D 8.8 mmHg, arm E 3.4 mmHg. The post-injection IOP differences of innovative techniques compared to the technique without ocular decompression were all statistically significant (p-value <0.01). If compared to arm A (35%), a reduction in IOP spike ≥40 mmHg frequency was also observed. The status of phakia/pseudophakia, a previous diagnosis of glaucoma and the underlying pathology for which indication was given to inject bevacizumab did not significantly alter the post-injection IOP in any of the protocols. CONCLUSION: The introduction of new injection protocols, such as injections performed before or after decompressive treatments, could be a safe and effective approach to control post-injection IOP increase. Dove 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7458273/ /pubmed/32921980 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S263474 Text en © 2020 Nuzzi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Nuzzi, Raffaele
Scalabrin, Simona
Becco, Alice
Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_full Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_fullStr Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_short Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_sort reduction of intraocular pressure spikes due to intravitreal bevacizumab injections by scleral indentation with cotton swab or digital ocular massage: innovative techniques compared
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32921980
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S263474
work_keys_str_mv AT nuzziraffaele reductionofintraocularpressurespikesduetointravitrealbevacizumabinjectionsbyscleralindentationwithcottonswabordigitalocularmassageinnovativetechniquescompared
AT scalabrinsimona reductionofintraocularpressurespikesduetointravitrealbevacizumabinjectionsbyscleralindentationwithcottonswabordigitalocularmassageinnovativetechniquescompared
AT beccoalice reductionofintraocularpressurespikesduetointravitrealbevacizumabinjectionsbyscleralindentationwithcottonswabordigitalocularmassageinnovativetechniquescompared