Cargando…

Carbidopa and Levodopa Extended Release Capsules in Patients with and without Troublesome and Non-Troublesome Dyskinesia

BACKGROUND: Carbidopa (CD) and levodopa (LD) extended release (CD-LD ER) capsules are designed to combine both immediate and extended release pharmacokinetics. In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, ADVANCE-PD trial, patients randomized to CD-LD ER experienced a 1.17-hour greater reduction in OFF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauser, Robert A., Zeitlin, Leonid, Fisher, Stanley, D’Souza, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32568108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-202010
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Carbidopa (CD) and levodopa (LD) extended release (CD-LD ER) capsules are designed to combine both immediate and extended release pharmacokinetics. In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, ADVANCE-PD trial, patients randomized to CD-LD ER experienced a 1.17-hour greater reduction in OFF time compared to patients randomized to CD-LD IR (p < 0.0001). OBJECTIVE: To compare CD-LD IR optimization to CD-LD ER conversion based on patient dyskinesia status at baseline using data from the ADVANCE-PD trial. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the ADVANCE-PD study. Patients were categorized by dyskinesia status at baseline into 1) those who had No Dyskinesia (ND), 2) those who had Non-Troublesome Dyskinesia Only (NTDO), and 3) those who had Troublesome Dyskinesia (TD). RESULTS: Comparative reductions in OFF time favoring CD-LD ER over CD-LD IR were similar for the ND (–1.08 h, p = 0.0071, n = 183) and NTDO (–1.12 h, p = 0.0104, n = 131) groups, and smaller for the TD group (–0.82 h, p = 0.2382, n = 79). Reductions in OFF time for both CD-LD ER conversion and CD-LD IR adjustment were largest within the ND group and smallest within the TD group (CD-LD ER: ND –2.86 h, NTDO –2.11 h, TD –1.36 h; CD-LD IR: ND –1.78 h, NTDO –0.99 h, TD –0.55 h). CONCLUSION: Responses to both CD-LD IR adjustment and CD-LD ER conversion depended on baseline dyskinesia status. Significant reductions in OFF time with CD-LD ER compared to CD-LD IR were observed in the ND and NTDO groups. In the TD group, comparing CD-LD ER conversion to CD-LD IR optimization, benefits were still observed, but there was less reduction in OFF time, less reduction in troublesome dyskinesia, and fewer patients self-rated themselves much or very much improved than in the ND and NTDO groups. These data suggest that in clinical practice, the best chances for success with conversion from CD-LD IR to CD-LD ER are in patients without TD.