Cargando…
Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at a cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study selected 91 patients who had chest CT and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0040 |
_version_ | 1783576223933267968 |
---|---|
author | Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Chojniak, Rubens |
author_facet | Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Chojniak, Rubens |
author_sort | Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at a cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study selected 91 patients who had chest CT and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test collected at the same day. CT results were classified in negative, typical, indeterminate or atypical findings. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for two different scenarios: in the first, only typical findings on CT were considered positive; in the second, both typical and indeterminate findings were considered positive. RESULTS: Mean patients’ age was 58.2 years, most were male (60.4%) and had prior diagnosis of cancer (85.7%). CT showed typical findings in 28.6%, indeterminate findings in 24.2% and atypical findings in 26.4%. RT-PCR results were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 27.5%. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the first and second scenarios were respectively 64.0%, 84.8% and 79.1%, and 92.0%, 62.1% and 70.3%. CONCLUSION: CT has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Different interpretation criteria can provide either high sensitivity or high specificity. CT should be integrated as a triage test in resource-constrained environments during the pandemic to assist in the optimization of PCR-tests, isolation beds and intensive care units. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7458561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74585612020-09-04 Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Chojniak, Rubens Radiol Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at a cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study selected 91 patients who had chest CT and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test collected at the same day. CT results were classified in negative, typical, indeterminate or atypical findings. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for two different scenarios: in the first, only typical findings on CT were considered positive; in the second, both typical and indeterminate findings were considered positive. RESULTS: Mean patients’ age was 58.2 years, most were male (60.4%) and had prior diagnosis of cancer (85.7%). CT showed typical findings in 28.6%, indeterminate findings in 24.2% and atypical findings in 26.4%. RT-PCR results were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 27.5%. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the first and second scenarios were respectively 64.0%, 84.8% and 79.1%, and 92.0%, 62.1% and 70.3%. CONCLUSION: CT has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Different interpretation criteria can provide either high sensitivity or high specificity. CT should be integrated as a triage test in resource-constrained environments during the pandemic to assist in the optimization of PCR-tests, isolation beds and intensive care units. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7458561/ /pubmed/32904703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0040 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Chojniak, Rubens Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center |
title | Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center |
title_full | Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center |
title_fullStr | Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center |
title_full_unstemmed | Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center |
title_short | Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center |
title_sort | chest ct accuracy in the diagnosis of sars-cov-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbosapaulanicolevieirapinto chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter AT bitencourtalmirgalvaovieira chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter AT demirandagabrieldiaz chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter AT almeidamariafernandaarruda chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter AT chojniakrubens chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter |