Cargando…

Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at a cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study selected 91 patients who had chest CT and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto, Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira, de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz, Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda, Chojniak, Rubens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0040
_version_ 1783576223933267968
author Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto
Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira
de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz
Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda
Chojniak, Rubens
author_facet Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto
Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira
de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz
Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda
Chojniak, Rubens
author_sort Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at a cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study selected 91 patients who had chest CT and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test collected at the same day. CT results were classified in negative, typical, indeterminate or atypical findings. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for two different scenarios: in the first, only typical findings on CT were considered positive; in the second, both typical and indeterminate findings were considered positive. RESULTS: Mean patients’ age was 58.2 years, most were male (60.4%) and had prior diagnosis of cancer (85.7%). CT showed typical findings in 28.6%, indeterminate findings in 24.2% and atypical findings in 26.4%. RT-PCR results were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 27.5%. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the first and second scenarios were respectively 64.0%, 84.8% and 79.1%, and 92.0%, 62.1% and 70.3%. CONCLUSION: CT has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Different interpretation criteria can provide either high sensitivity or high specificity. CT should be integrated as a triage test in resource-constrained environments during the pandemic to assist in the optimization of PCR-tests, isolation beds and intensive care units.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7458561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74585612020-09-04 Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Chojniak, Rubens Radiol Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at a cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study selected 91 patients who had chest CT and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test collected at the same day. CT results were classified in negative, typical, indeterminate or atypical findings. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for two different scenarios: in the first, only typical findings on CT were considered positive; in the second, both typical and indeterminate findings were considered positive. RESULTS: Mean patients’ age was 58.2 years, most were male (60.4%) and had prior diagnosis of cancer (85.7%). CT showed typical findings in 28.6%, indeterminate findings in 24.2% and atypical findings in 26.4%. RT-PCR results were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 27.5%. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the first and second scenarios were respectively 64.0%, 84.8% and 79.1%, and 92.0%, 62.1% and 70.3%. CONCLUSION: CT has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Different interpretation criteria can provide either high sensitivity or high specificity. CT should be integrated as a triage test in resource-constrained environments during the pandemic to assist in the optimization of PCR-tests, isolation beds and intensive care units. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7458561/ /pubmed/32904703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0040 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto
Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira
de Miranda, Gabriel Diaz
Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda
Chojniak, Rubens
Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center
title Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center
title_full Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center
title_fullStr Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center
title_full_unstemmed Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center
title_short Chest CT accuracy in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center
title_sort chest ct accuracy in the diagnosis of sars-cov-2 infection: initial experience in a cancer center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0040
work_keys_str_mv AT barbosapaulanicolevieirapinto chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter
AT bitencourtalmirgalvaovieira chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter
AT demirandagabrieldiaz chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter
AT almeidamariafernandaarruda chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter
AT chojniakrubens chestctaccuracyinthediagnosisofsarscov2infectioninitialexperienceinacancercenter