Cargando…
Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse
BACKGROUND: Cancer outcome is associated with circulating immune cells, including eosinophils. Here we analyze the relative eosinophil count (REC) in different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: Stage I–III breast cancer patients were included in the study and classified as REC-high vs low (cutoff 1.5...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1761176 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Cancer outcome is associated with circulating immune cells, including eosinophils. Here we analyze the relative eosinophil count (REC) in different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: Stage I–III breast cancer patients were included in the study and classified as REC-high vs low (cutoff 1.5%) or relative lymphocyte count (RLC)-high vs low (cutoff 17.5%). The co-primary endpoints were the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) or the time to treatment failure (TTF) in the REC groups. RESULTS: Overall 930 patients were included in the study. We observed a benefit for REC-high vs REC-low in TTF (HR 0.610, 95% CI 0.458–0.812), and in BCSS (HR 0.632, 95% CI 0.433–0.923). Similarly, we observed a better TTF (HR 0.421, 95% CI 0.262–0.677) and BCSS (HR 0.350, 95% CI 0.200–0.614) in RLC-high vs low. A lower relapse rate was observed in the REC-high vs REC-low group (17.1% vs 24.7%, p = 0.005), not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. A lower median REC at baseline and at relapse was observed compared to REC after surgery and during cancer-free follow-up (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: REC could be a new promising, affordable and accessible predictive and prognostic biomarker in all breast cancer subtypes. |
---|